Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013, Article ID 618495, 6 pages
Research Article

Integrated Electrokinetics-Adsorption Remediation of Saline-Sodic Soils: Effects of Voltage Gradient and Contaminant Concentration on Soil Electrical Conductivity

1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Dammam, Dammam 31451, Saudi Arabia

Received 6 August 2013; Accepted 2 October 2013

Academic Editors: K. C. Cheung and C. García

Copyright © 2013 Mohammed Hussain Essa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. V. Ho, P. W. Sheridan, C. J. Athmer et al., “Integrated in situ soil remediation technology: the lasagna process,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2528–2534, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. R. Reddy, “Special issue on contaminant mixtures: fate, transport, and remediation,” Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 128–129, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. J. Athmer and S. V. Ho, “Field studies: organic-contaminated soil remediation with lasagna technology,” in Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater, K. R. Reddy and C. Cameselle, Eds., pp. 625–646, John Wiley & Sons, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  4. I. P. Abrol, J. S. P. Yadav, and F. I. Massoud, Salt-Affected Soils and Their Management: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Soils Bulletin 39, 1988.
  5. V. P. Evangelou, Environmental Soil and Water Chemistry: Principles and Applications, Wiley, 1998.
  6. D. L. Sparks, Environmental Soil Chemistry, Academic Press, 2nd edition, 2003.
  7. S. Lukman, M. H. Essa, N. D. Mu'azu, and A. Bukhari, “Coupled electrokinetics-adsorption technique for simultaneous removal of heavy metals and organics from saline-sodic soil,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 346910, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. F. E. Asimakopoulou, I. F. Gonos, and I. A. Stathopulos, “Methodologies for determination of soil ionization gradient,” Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 457–461, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Bezerra, R. E. Santelli, E. P. Oliveira, L. S. Villar, and L. A. Escaleira, “Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry,” Talanta, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 965–977, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. H. Myers, D. C. Montgomery, and C. M. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley, 2009.
  11. M. J. Anderson and P. J. Whitcomb, RSM Simplified: Opitimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments, Productivity Press, 2005.
  12. S. Lukman, M. H. Essa, N. D. Mu'azu, A. Bukhari, and C. Basheer, “Adsorption and desorption of heavy metals onto natural clay material: influence of initial pH,” Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. H. Essa and M. A. Al-Zahrani, “Date pits as potential raw material for the production of activated carbons,” International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Derringer and R. Suich, “Simultaneous optimization of several response variables,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 214–219, 1980. View at Google Scholar