Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 723201, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/723201
Research Article

Enhanced Water Splitting by Fe2O3-TiO2-FTO Photoanode with Modified Energy Band Structure

1Institute/Faculty of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Republic of Korea
2Department of Environmental Engineering, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Jeonnam 540-742, Republic of Korea
3Department of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, Inha Technical College, Incheon 402-752, Republic of Korea

Received 19 October 2013; Accepted 24 November 2013

Academic Editors: D. Jing, J. Shi, and H. Zhou

Copyright © 2013 Eul Noh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The effect of TiO2 layer applied to the conventional Fe2O3/FTO photoanode to improve the photoelectrochemical performance was assessed from the viewpoint of the microstructure and energy band structure. Regardless of the location of the TiO2 layer in the photoanodes, that is, Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO or TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO, high performance was obtained when α-Fe2O3 and H-TiNT/anatase-TiO2 phases existed in the constituent Fe2O3 and TiO2 layers after optimized heat treatments. The presence of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles with high uniformity in the each layer of the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO photoanode achieved by a simple dipping process seemed to positively affect the performance improvement by modifying the energy band structure to a more favorable one for efficient electrons transfer. Our current study suggests that the application of the TiO2 interlayer, together with α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles present in the each constituent layers, could significantly contribute to the performance improvement of the conventional Fe2O3 photoanode.

1. Introduction

Green energy sources have been extensively investigated to replace the fossil fuels due to their inherent problems of pollution and limited resources [1]. Among them, hydrogen (H2) gas was one of the most actively studied energy sources owing to its abundance, high specific energy capacity, and environmentally friendliness [24]. Hydrogen can be produced by using hydrocarbons such as fossil fuels, natural gas, and water. Production of hydrogen gas by electrolysis of water has been known to be the most efficient way [57]. Energy required to generate hydrogen and oxygen by electrolysis of water can be supplied through sun light. For the sun light to be effectively utilized, electrodes having functions of photoabsorbent and catalyst need to be employed for electrolysis of water. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) system is an efficient approach to produce hydrogen gas from water by utilizing an unlimited resource of the sun light without generating environmentally deleterious byproducts. With the development of PEC system, much attention has been paid to the fabrication of high efficient photoelectrode for water splitting [4, 810]. Among other things, materials extensively studied for the photoelectrode were Co [11, 12], Co-Pi [13, 14], IrO2 [15], TiO2 [1618], CuO [19], WO3 [20], Fe2O3 [21], and so forth.

In particular, more interest has been drawn to Fe2O3 material which could harvest visible part of solar spectrum [2123]. However, Fe2O3 has some critical issues to be resolved for the application to the PEC system as photoelectrode such as electron-hole recombination. Several approaches have been taken to reduce the recombination; application of nanostructured materials, doping with appropriate materials, and so forth. Photocurrent density generated with the Fe2O3 nanorods and nanowires was reported to have 1.3 mA/cm2 [21] and 0.54 mA/cm2 at 1.23 ( versus RHE) [22], respectively. On the other hand, Fe2O3 photoanode doped with Ti and Si showed a little better performance of 1.83 mA/cm2 [24] and 2.2 mA/cm2 at 1.23 ( versus RHE) [25], respectively. However, the photocurrent density of Fe2O3 photoanode modified with the nanostructures and doping was found to be still far below the theoretical value of 12.6 mA/cm2 at 1.23 ( versus RHE). From our previous work, we reported a high photocurrent density of 1.32 mA/cm2 at 1.23 ( versus RHE) with Fe2O3/FTO photoanode without any doping [26], synthesized by a simple process of dip coating and short-time heat treatment at 500°C of nanosized Fe2O3 on the FTO substrate. Our results confirmed the importance of microstructure of Fe2O3 to the reduction of electron-hole recombination, which could be modified and optimized by the coating amount of Fe2O3 and following heat treatment conditions [27]. Taking advantage of photocatalytic effect of TiO2, Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO photoanode was also fabricated in another study. From the energy band structure viewpoint of the photoanode, the electrons generated on the Fe2O3 film should overcome a barrier to be transferred to FTO, probably deteriorating the performance [28]. However, the photoanode showed the opposite result of much higher photocurrent density of 4.81 mA/cm2 at 1.23 ( versus RHE) [29].

In this current work, the effect of microstructure and energy band structure of the photoanodes with the different arrangement of the constituent elements (e.g., TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO, Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO) on the performance was investigated and discussed in relation with the electrons transfer in the photoanode.

2. Experimental Details

FTO glasses (Asahi Glass Co.) as a conducting substrate of Fe2O3 photoanode film for water splitting was at first etched for 20 min using Piranha solution (7 : 3 = 70% conc. H2SO4 : 30% H2O2) to make them have fresh surface and then were dipped simply to make H-TiNT (hydrogen titanate nanotube) particles supported in aqueous Fe(NO3)3 solution (corresponding to Fe2O3 precursor) or H-TiNT particles dispersed solution (corresponding to TiO2 precursor particles). In this study, various photoanode arrangements such as Fe(NO3)3/FTO, Fe(NO3)3/H-TiNT/FTO, and H-TiNT/Fe(NO3)3/FTO were prepared. Coated Fe(NO3)3 and H-TiNT particles were transformed into Fe2O3 and TiO2 phases, respectively, with heat treatments at 500°C for 10 min in air. In other words, for the performance improvement of Fe2O3 film, the arrangements with H-TiNT interlayer incorporated in between Fe(NO3)3 and FTO and with H-TiNT top layer on the Fe(NO3)3/FTO were tried. All aqueous solutions in this experiment were prepared using distilled water with 1.8 MΩ.

To make H-TiNT interlayer (finally Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO arrangement), the FTO glass after having been surface-treated for 20 min in 0.2 M polyethyleneimine (PEI, Aldrich Co.) aqueous solution containing positively charged ions was used as a transparent conductive substrate. First, the surface-pretreated FTO glass was immersed for 20 min in an aqueous 10 g/L H-TiNT particle solution dispersed together with 0.2 M tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH, Aldrich Co.) to produce negatively charged ions. Afterwards, using the same method, an H-TiNT-treated film was subsequently immersed in 0.2 M polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PDDA, Aldrich Co.) aqueous solution, which contained positively charged ions. The obtained H-TiNT/FTO glass was dried under UV-Vis light irradiation (Hg-Xe 200 W lamp, Super-cure, SAN-EI Electric) to remove water and all surfactants, such as PEI, TBAOH, and PDDA using photocatalytic removal reaction occurred by H-TiNT particles with optical energy bandgap of 3.5 eV [24], without any sintering. Then, for the Fe(NO3)3 nanoparticle coating process, the dried H-TiNT/FTO substrates were dipped in an aqueous 1.0 M Fe(NO3)3 solution with dipping times of 12 hrs. For formations of H-TiNT top layer on Fe(NO3)3/FTO films (finally TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO arrangement), the precursor solution of Fe2O3 film supported was made of 1.0 M Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and 0.2 M TBAOH (tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, Aldrich) for dipping fresh FTO substrate for 12 hrs. After that, obtained Fe(NO3)3/FTO were dried at 80°C for 12 hrs. For formation of H-TiNT/Fe(NO3)3/FTO films, repetitive self-assembling of oppositely charged ions in an aqueous solution was applied to coat directly the H-TiNT particles using the same process explained above. All dipping process was carried out at room temperature in air.

All heat treatment was done inside a box furnace with heating rate of 500°C/sec to produce the final photoanode thin film with α-Fe2O3 phase for the water splitting process, where the rapid heating rate was accomplished by plunging the samples into the hot zone of the furnace maintained at the setting temperatures of 420~550°C. Repetition of this process yielded an H-TiNT particle thin film coated on the FTO or Fe2O3 film with approximately 700~1000 nm thickness as previously reported in our researches [30]. After the heat treatment at various conditions, the surface microstructure of the Fe2O3 thin films was observed with scanning electron microscope (SEM; S-4700, Hitachi) and their crystallinity was analyzed using X-ray diffractometer (XRD; D/MAX 2500, Rigaku), Raman spectroscopy (Renishow, inVia Raman microscope), UV-Vis spectroscopy (S-3100, Sinco). To measure the I-V and C-V electrochemical properties using μAutolab type III potentiostat (Metrohm Autolab), a calomel electrode and a Pt wire were used as the reference and counter electrodes, respectively, when the as-prepared, heat-treated coated Fe2O3/H-TiNT composite films with various arrangements were used as the working electrode in an aqueous 1.0 M NaOH deaerated solution under irradiation of 100 mW/cm2 UV-Vis spectrum (Hg-Xe 200 W lamp, Super-cure, SAN-EI Electric). The measured potentials versus calomel were converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale in all I-V graphs.

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 1 shows I-V photoelectrochemical data and surface morphology of the Fe2O3 precursor/(H-TiNT)/FTO samples, which had been heat treated at the predetermined temperatures of 420~550°C for 10 min. The amount of Fe2O3 in the samples was 65.48 wt% for the Fe2O3/H-TiNT/FTO and about 30 wt% for the Fe2O3/FTO, which was determined based on the I-V photoelectrochemical performance as reported in our previous study [29]. All the samples were measured in the 1.0 M NaOH solution under 100 mW/cm2 of UV-Vis light illumination, and the linear sweep voltammetry was in the range of 0.0~+2.0 ( versus RHE). The photocurrent densities were obtained by eliminating the “dark” fraction from “illumination” data, where dark data was measured in the dark room without UV light illumination. For the comparison, sample (e) without TiO2 interlayer was adopted from our previous work [26].

723201.fig.001
Figure 1: Photoelectrochemical I-V characteristics of Fe2O3 precursor/H-TiNT/FTO heat treated at (a) 420°C, (b) 460°C, (c) 500°C, and (d) 550°C in the air, compared to (e) Fe2O3 precursor/FTO heat treated at 500°C.

Regardless of the heat treatment temperatures, the performance improvement was observed in the samples with TiO2 interlayer incorporated in between Fe2O3 and FTO. In particular, sample (c) prepared under the same condition as sample (e) other than the presence of TiO2 interlayer film showed about 3 times increase of photocurrent density at 1.23 ( versus RHE) and the reduction of the onset voltage to about 0.75 V. These results suggest that the TiO2 interlayer can play a significant role in the efficient collection and conversion of photoenergy. The extent of performance improvement was found to be affected by the heat treatment temperature; it showed a gradual improvement with the heat treatment temperature of up to 500°C, above which it rather deteriorated. A similar result was observed with the Fe2O3/FTO samples without TiO2 interlayer film in our previous work [26].

Morphology of the Fe2O3/FTO sample after heat treatment at 500°C for 10 min was shown in Figure 1(e). The Fe2O3 particles were observed to form a film conformal to the FTO substrate, indicating a very thin and uniform film as noted by Oh et al. [31]. Microstructure changes of the Fe2O3 precursor/H-TiNT/FTO samples were also monitored as a function of heat treatment temperature of 420~550°C. The as-coated porous and rough H-TiNT particles with fibrous morphology as reported in our previous work [27] were broken into spherical particles through the heat treatments. It is noteworthy that the Fe2O3 particles in the Fe2O3/H-TiNT/FTO samples were relatively smaller than those in the Fe2O3/FTO sample, suggesting that the growth of the Fe2O3 particles was restrained by H-TiNT during the heat treatments. However, no noticeable microstructural differences were observed among the Fe2O3/H-TiNT/FTO samples which could explain the performance variation occurred in the samples.

The contribution of the TiO2 interlayer placed in between Fe2O3 and FTO on the photocurrent density improvement at 1.23 ( versus RHE) as a function of heat treatment temperature was quantitatively expressed in Figure 2. The data for the Fe2O3/FTO samples were taken as a reference from our previous work [26]. The effect of the TiO2 interlayer on the performance improvement was substantially increased with the temperature to the highest at 500°C, above which it rather declined.

723201.fig.002
Figure 2: Comparison of photocurrent densities at 1.23 V versus RHE for Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO and Fe2O3/FTO samples with annealing temperatures.

Phase changes of the constituent materials in the samples with the heat treatments were observed in our previous work [30]. It was observed that Fe2O3 precursor was gradually transformed into α-Fe2O3 phase with the increase of heat treatment temperature from 420 to 550°C. However, peaks corresponding to α-Fe2O3 phase became weaker above 500°C. On the other hand, H-TiNT was transformed gradually but not fully into anatase-TiO2 phase due to the short heat treatment time of 10 min. Therefore, from the phase and photocurrent density changes of the samples, the performance improvement is considered to be closely associated with the phases present in the samples: the best performance could be obtained when H-TiNT and anatase-TiO2 phases coexisted with the well-developed α-Fe2O3 phase in the sample.

Effect of the coating layers arrangement in the Fe2O3-TiO2-FTO samples was investigated in terms of the performance in Figure 3, in which the photocurrent densities were obtained by eliminating the “dark” fraction from “illumination” data. All the samples except sample (d) were heat treated once at 500°C for 10 min in the air following synthesis of the multilayered electrodes. Sample (d) was heat treated twice under the same condition mentioned above: once after TiNT coating on the FTO, then repeated after Fe2O3 coating on the heat-treated TiO2/FTO layer. Regardless of the location of TiO2 layer, above or below Fe2O3 layer (Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO (Figures 3(b) and 3(d)) or TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO (Figure 3(c))), samples containing TiO2 layer (Figures 3(b), 3(c), and 3(d)) showed much better performance compared to that (Figure 3(a)) without TiO2 layer, increased photocurrent density as well as reduced onset voltage.

723201.fig.003
Figure 3: Photoelectrochemical I-V characteristics of the samples with the stacking structures of (a) Fe2O3/FTO, (b) Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO, and (c) TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO, which were all heat treated at 500°C for 10 min in the air. Curve (d) was obtained from Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO double heat treated under the same condition as above: 1st after H-TiNT coating on FTO and 2nd after Fe2O3 coating on the heat-treated H-TiNT/FTO.

Microstructure observed in Figure 4 suggested that film uniformity along with the controlled particles size could play an important role for the performance improvement, Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO sample (Figure 4(b)) with the best performance consisted of smaller particles with high uniformity than sample (c) of TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO. Double heat-treated sample (d) of Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO showed an inferior performance to the corresponding sample (b) with the same layer structure, which was annealed only one time. This result also confirmed the importance of microstructure to the performance; the poor microstructure with agglomerated particles and cracked surface after the double heat treatment as shown in sample (d) adversely affected the performance of the sample. On the other hand, Figure 4(a) shows the Fe2O3 precursor powders becoming much larger when heat treated at 500°C for 10 min, compared to the Fe2O3 particles existing together with the TiO2 in the case of Figures 4(b)4(d). These observations are consistent with the results of Figure 1, which showed the restrained growth of the Fe2O3 particles by H-TiNT during the heat treatment.

fig4
Figure 4: SEM photos of (a) Fe(NO3)3 powders heat treated at 500°C for 10 min, and (b), (c), (d) correspond to Figures 3(b), 3(c), and 3(d), respectively.

It is noteworthy that among the samples with TiO2 layer, the sample (Figures 4(b) and 4(d)) with the TiO2 layer in between Fe2O3 and FTO layer showed better result than the sample (Figure 4(c)) having the TiO2 layer above Fe2O3 layer. These results were discussed in terms of energy band structure and microstructure. Energy band diagrams of the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO and TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO samples without UV-Vis light irradiation were schematically drawn in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), respectively. It was proposed by Wang et al. that a photoelectrode with TiO2 based film such as SrTiO3 located above Fe2O3 film was a favorable structure for electrons transfer from the energy band diagram consideration [32]. Their claim seems to be reasonable from the comparison of the energy band diagrams when being not under UV-Vis light. However, our results showed that the electrons generated on the Fe2O3 layer in the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO photoanode could be transferred to the TiO2/FTO when being under the UV-Vis light irradiation by overcoming the discontinuity of the conduction bands.

fig5
Figure 5: Energy band diagrams of (a) Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO and (b) TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO photoanode and (c) schematic microstructure of Fe2O3-TiO2-FTO.

On the other hand, the microstructure of the Fe2O3/TiO2/Fe2O3 sample synthesized for the current work was also carefully considered. While synthesizing the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO sample, some of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles could be infiltrated to the bottom FTO substrate through TiO2 particles when TiNT/FTO was placed in the precursor solution of Fe2O3. As a result, Fe2O3 nanoparticles could also be present in the middle TiO2 and the bottom FTO layer as depicted in Figure 5(c). Thus, our sample of Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO seemed actually to have an energy band diagram combining both of Figures 5(a) and 5(b), indicating that the photoanode with Fe2O3 nanoparticles present even in the middle and bottom substrate is preferable for the performance enhancement.

Oxidation-reduction reactions for the selected photoanode samples were observed by using cyclic voltammetry (CV) to investigate the effect of the coating sequence of constituent films and heat treatment condition on the photoelectrode performance. CV data for the samples of FTO glass, TiO2/FTO, and Fe2O3/FTO were obtained as a reference in Figures 6(A)-(a), 6(A)-(b), and 6(A)-(c), respectively. As expected the sample including Fe2O3 showed active reactions with the applied potential. According to the data (Figure 6(B)) from the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO samples heat treated at the various temperature of 420 ~ 550°C for 10 min, the sample heat treated at 500°C showed multiple oxidation-reduction peaks, contributing to higher photocurrent density. These results were found to be consistent with I-V data of the samples described in Figure 1 where the sample heat-treated at 500°C showed best performance. The sample of Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO which showed best result after heat treatment at 500°C was then compared with TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO sample to see the effect of the location of TiO2 layer placed in the photoanode, which was also heat treated under the same condition. These samples showed a clear contrast in the results as shown in Figures 6(C)-(a) and 6(C)-(b), respectively: Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO sample produced more and clear oxidation-reduction peaks. On the other hand, the sample of Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO, which was heat treated twice after each coating of TiO2 and Fe2O3 layers, showed an intermediate performance (Figure 6(C)-(c)). These results were all well consistent with the I-V data in Figure 3 where the sample of Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO heat treated once (Figure 3(b)) at 500°C showed best performance followed by the sample double heat treated (Figure 3(d)) and TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO sample (Figure 3(c)).

723201.fig.006
Figure 6: CV characteristics measured under 100 mW/cm2 UV-Vis illumination: (A) (a) FTO glass, (b) TiO2/FTO, and (c) Fe2O3/FTO samples were investigated after heat treatment at 500°C for 10 min in the air, (B) Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO samples were become heat treated for 10 min in the air at (a) 420°C, (b) 500°C, and (c) 550°C, (C) (a) Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO and (b) TiO2/Fe2O3/FTO heat treated at 500°C for 10 min in the air, and (c) Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO sample double heat treated, corresponding to (d) in Figure 3.

4. Conclusions

Fe2O3-TiO2 based photoanodes for water splitting were synthesized on the FTO substrate and their performance results were understood from the microstructure and energy band aspects. Comparatively, the photoanode (Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO) comprising top layer of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles along with the interlayer having mixed phases of H-TiNT/anatase-TiO2 showed best performance. The nanoscaled Fe2O3 particles with high uniformity were observed to contribute to the performance enhancement. In addition, the presence of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles in the middle and bottom layers caused by the infiltration of the precursor solution of Fe2O3 during synthesis seemed to modify the energy band structure to more favorable one for efficient electrons transfer. Our current results suggest that the application of the TiO2 interlayer, together with optimized amount of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles present in the constituent layers, could significantly contribute to the performance improvement of the conventional Fe2O3 photoanode.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (no. 2011-0016699) and Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning funded by Ministry of Knowledge Economy. (no. 20113030010050-12-2-200).

References

  1. T. N. Veziroğlua and S. Şahin, “21st century’s energy: hydrogen energy system,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 49, pp. 1820–1831, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  2. N. Z. Muradov, “How to produce hydrogen from fossil fuels without carbon dioxide emission,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 211–215, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Y. García and M. A. Laborde, “Hydrogen production by the steam reforming of ethanol: thermodynamic analysis,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 307–312, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode,” Nature, vol. 238, no. 5358, pp. 37–38, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. J. Bard and M. A. Fox, “Artificial photosynthesis: solar splitting of water to hydrogen and oxygen,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 141–145, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. O. Khaselev and J. A. Turner, “A monolithic photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5362, pp. 425–427, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. A. Turner, “Sustainable hydrogen production,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5686, pp. 972–974, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Kumar, P. Sharma, R. Shrivastav, S. Dass, and V. R. Satsangi, “Electrodeposited zirconium-doped α-Fe2O3 thin film for photoelectrochemical water splitting,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 2777–2784, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. R. Mishra, P. K. Shukla, and O. N. Srivastava, “Study of modular PEC solar cells for photoelectrochemical splitting of water employing nanostructured TiO2 photoelectrodes,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1680–1685, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Sun, C. J. Murphy, K. R. Reyes-Gil et al., “Photoelectrochemical and structural characterization of carbon-doped WO3 films prepared via spray pyrolysis,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 8476–8484, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Kay, I. Cesar, and M. Grätzel, “New benchmark for water photooxidation by nanostructured α-Fe2O3 films,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 49, pp. 15714–15721, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. K. Zhong, J. Sun, H. Inumaru, and D. R. Gamelin, “Solar water oxidation by composite catalyst/α-Fe2O3 photoanodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 17, pp. 6086–6087, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. W. Kanan and D. G. Nocera, “In situ formation of an oxygen-evolving catalyst in neutral water containing phosphate and Co2+,” Science, vol. 321, no. 5892, pp. 1072–1075, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. K. Zhong and D. R. Gamelin, “Photo-electrochemical water oxidation by cobalt catalyst (“Co-Pi”)/α-Fe2O3 composite photoanodes: oxygen evolution and resolution of a kinetic bottleneck,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 4202–4207, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. D. Tilley, M. Cornuz, K. Sivula, and M. Grätzel, “Light-inducedwater splitting with hematite: improved nanostructure and iridium oxide catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 49, no. 36, pp. 6405–6408, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Guo, X. Quan, N. Lu, H. Zhao, and S. Chen, “High photocatalytic capability of self-assembled nanoporous WO3 with preferential orientation of (002) planes,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 4422–4427, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Zhang, M. F. Hossain, and T. Takahashi, “Self-assembled hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanotube arrays for photoelectrocatalytic degradation of azo dye under simulated solar light irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 95, no. 3-4, pp. 423–429, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Matos, J. Laine, and J.-M. Herrmann, “Effect of the type of activated carbons on the photocatalytic degradation of aqueous organic pollutants by UV-irradiated titania,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. S. Chaudhary, S. A. Khan, C. Tripathi, R. Shrivastav, V. R. Satsangi, and S. Dass, “A study on 170 MeV Au13+ irradiated nanostructured metal oxide (Fe2O3 and CuO) thin films for PEC applications,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 244, no. 1, pp. 128–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Mao, J. K. Kim, K. Shin et al., “Hematite modified tungsten trioxide nanoparticle photoanode for solar water oxidation,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 210, pp. 32–37, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Thimsen, F. Le Formal, M. Grätzel, and S. C. Warren, “Influence of plasmonic Au nanoparticles on the photoactivity of Fe2O3 electrodes for water splitting,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Saremi-Yarahmadi, B. Vaidhyanathan, and K. G. U. Wijayantha, “Microwave-assisted low temperature fabrication of nanostructured α-Fe2O3 electrodes for solar-driven hydrogen generation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 19, pp. 10155–10165, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Bak, J. Nowotny, M. Rekas, and C. C. Sorrell, “Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation from water using solar energy. Materials-related aspects,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 991–1022, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. Wang, Y. Ling, D. A. Wheeler et al., “Facile synthesis of highly photoactive α-Fe2O3-based films for water oxidation,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 3503–3509, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Kay, I. Cesar, and M. Grätzel, “New benchmark for water photooxidation by nanostructured α-Fe2O3 films,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 49, pp. 15714–15721, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. J. Noh, B. R. Kim, G. J. Yoon, S. C. Jung, W. S. Kang, and S. J. Kim, “Microstructural effect on the photoelectrochemical performance of hematite-Fe2O3 photoanode for water splitting,” Electronic Materials Letters, vol. 8, pp. 345–350, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  27. H.-J. Oh, K.-J. Noh, H.-K. Ku et al., “Preparation of hydrogen titanate nanotube/FTO glass thin film obtained by the layer-by-layer-self assembling method for water splitting,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 7210–7213, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Peng, T. Xie, Y. Lu, H. Fan, and D. Wang, “Synthesis, photoelectric properties and photocatalytic activity of the Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 12, no. 28, pp. 8033–8041, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. J. Noh, H. J. Oh, B. R. Kim, S. C. Jung, W. S. Kang, and S. J. Kim, “Photoelectrochemical properties of Fe2O3 supported on TiO2-based thin films converted from self-assembled hydrogen titanate nanotube powders,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 475430, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. K. J. Noh, H. J. Oh, H. K. Ku et al., “Annealing effect on the microstructure and electrochemical properties of Fe2O3/H-TiNT/FTO thin film,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 13, pp. 1863–1866, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  31. H. J. Oh, K. J. Noh, B. R. Kim, W. S. Kang, S. C. Jung, and S. J. Kim, “Fabrication of Fe2O3/TiO2 photoanode for improved photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 52, Article ID 01AC15, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  32. Y. Wang, T. Yu, X. Chen et al., “Enhancement of photoelectric conversion properties of SrTiO3/α-Fe2O3 heterojunction photoanode,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 3925–3930, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus