The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 843968 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/843968

Aseel Mohammed Hamzah, Aseel Mohammed Hussein, Jenan Mahmoud Khalef, "Isolation of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 Strain from Fecal Samples of Zoo Animal", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 843968, 5 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/843968

Isolation of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 Strain from Fecal Samples of Zoo Animal

Academic Editor: C. DebRoy
Received06 Aug 2013
Accepted29 Sep 2013
Published30 Dec 2013

Abstract

The isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains from 22 out of 174 fecal samples from petting zoo animals representing twenty-two different species (camel, lion, goats, zebra, bear, baboon monkey, Siberian monkey, deer, elk, llama, pony, horses, fox, kangaroo, wolf, porcupine, chickens, tiger, ostrich, hyena, dogs, and wildcats) were investigated. One petting Al-Zawraa zoological society of Baghdad was investigated for E. coli O157:H7 over a 16-month period that spanned two summer and two autumn seasons. Variation in the occurrence of E. coli O157:H7-positive petting zoo animals was observed, with animals being culture positive only in the summer months but not in the spring, autumn, or winter. E. coli O157:H7 isolates were distinguished by agglutination with E. coli O157:H7 latex reagent (Oxoid), identified among the isolates, which showed that multiple E. coli strains were isolated from one petting zoo animal, in which a single animal simultaneously shed multiple E. coli strains; E. coli O157:H7 was isolated only by selective enrichment culture of 2 g of petting zoo animal feces. In contrast, strains other than O157:H7 were cultured from feces of petting zoo animals without enrichment.

1. Introduction

Since it was first identified in the early 1980s [1], the enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) strains are a subset of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli strains that have been associated with animals and human diseases. In humans including self-limited watery diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and the hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) [2], this syndrome happened in 2–7% of people with E. coli 0157:H7 infection causing bloody diarrhea [3], in many areas of the world [48]. Among the EHEC serotypes, O157:H7, which expresses somatic (O) antigen 157 and flagellar (H) antigen 7, causes serious morbidity and large disease outbreaks, making this bacterium one of the most important food-borne and waterborne pathogens worldwide [911]. In 1995, an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections in people was traced to jerky made from deer meat [12].

The vulnerable sectors of the community (children and the elderly) are at the most risk of developing severe infection, making it a very emotive issue in public health and across the food and agricultural industries [1317].

Cattle appear to be major reservoir for verotoxin-producing E. coli O157 [1822], although it has also been found in sheep, goats, heifer, birds, deer, geese, turkey, seabirds, dogs, cat, gull, chicken, pig, monkey, reptiles, llama, and horses, as well as on flies [2330]. However, the extent to which these animal species play a role in the epidemiology of O157 infection remains to be established. Although most infections of O157 in humans have been linked to exposure to a food vehicle or water, person-to-person transmission of O157 and transmission by direct contact with animals or animal manure have also been reported [31].

Petting zoo visits are popular leisure activities and also have become an important feature of education for young children. Such visits are highly beneficial to children in helping them to learn about aspects of animal husbandry and farm produce. Close contact with the animals is often encouraged,such as petting and feeding animals, especially to the main group of visitors, young children, of acquiring severe zoonotic infections during visits to petting zoos. Several outbreak recorded of Escherichia coli O157 infections occurred among agricultural fair, festival, and petting zoo visitors in farm visits occurred in many country in Pennsylvania, Washington [32], Canada [33], and North Wales [34]. During 2003 to2004the capacity of STEC 0157 to persist and multiplicative in the farm environment (animal feces, straw, soil, water) [35] and their natural occurrence in several wild animal species from which interspecies transmission to domestic animals may occur [36], preventing the introduction of the infection, routine testing of brought-in replacement animals, culling infected animals, and closing infected petting zoos, all do not appear to be feasible or effective control measures.

Consistent with this, Pritchard et al. [37] found no obvious value in preentry of bacteriological testing of animals during a longitudinal study on a farm open to the public. Escherichia coli O157:H7 has been detected in the feces of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), but the extent of direct or indirect zoonotic risk of this source of E. coli O157:H7 has yet to be determined [38].

The morbidity and the mortality associated with outbreaks of gastrointestinal illnesses caused by STEC have highlighted the threat they pose to public health. Therefore, monitoring the presence of E. coli in animals will assure prompt diagnosis and identify the source of infection that may assist in risk management.

Epidemiological investigation of O157 strain in animal populations has focused mainly on the bovine reservoir and recently in horses, so the prevalence in other animals is not well known in Iraq. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of E. coli O157 in fecal samples collected from zoo animals in the Al-Zawraa zoological society of Baghdad in Iraq.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Animals

One hundred seventy-four fecal samples were collected from animals kept in Al_Zawraa zoological society of Baghdad of different breeds, ages, and sexes which were included in the study during the period from June 2010 to June 2013. Twenty-two animal species, representing, camel, lion, goats, zebra, bear, baboon monkey, Siberian monkey, deer, elk, llama, pony, horses, fox, kangaroo, wolf, porcupine, chickens, tiger, ostrich, hyena, dogs, and wildcats.

2.2. Sample Inoculation

Three g of each fecal sample was mixed with normal saline and centrifuged. The supernatant was discarded and the deposit was inoculated with 5 mL of buffered peptone water (Oxoid).

2.3. Selective Enrichment and Isolation of E. coli O157:H7

One loopful from cultured broth was placed in plate with Cefixime Tellurite-Sorbitol MacConkey (CT-SMAC) agar. The plate was streaked for isolation and incubated overnight. After incubation, all nonsorbitol-fermenting (grey/white) colonies were plated on both blood agar and Levine Eosin Methylene blue agar and incubated overnight at 37°C.

2.4. Agglutination Test

Individual isolates colonies of nonsorbitol-fermenting colonies on CT-SMAC medium were tested for the presence of the O157 and the H7 antigens by agglutination with E. coli O157 and H7 latex reagent (Oxoid).

3. Results

E. coli O157:H7 was isolated from twenty-two out of 174 fecal samples collected in Al_Zawraa zoological societies of Baghdad which are summarized in Table 1. E. coli O157:H7 was isolated from 30% bear, 22.2% deer, 28.6% pony, 16.7% horses, 20% zebra, 66.7% ostrich, 12.5% hyena, 16.7% llama, 25% goat, and 28.6% jaguar. The percentage of EHEC E. coli isolate and characteristic of E. coli O157:H7 are shown in Table 2.


Animal spp.Number of samplesMonth of sampleNo. of positive animalsPercentage of positive animals
for E. coli O157:H7

Bear10June 330%
Deer9June 222.2%
Pony7June 228.6%
Lion22April 313.6%
Elk8April112.5%
Dog8September Nil0%
Horse12April 216.7%
Wildcat5September Nil0%
Zebra5September 120%
Siberia monkey9February Nil0%
Ostrich3June 266.7%
Baboon monkey9February Nil0%
Hyena8April112.5%
Kangaroo1April Nil0%
Wolf 5February Nil0%
Camel9June Nil0%
Fox 6June Nil0%
Porcupine 5February Nil0%
Llama6June 116.7%
Goat8June 225%
Jaguar 7April 228.6%
Chicken 6February Nil0%


Animal spp.Positive samples for EHEC% of E. coli isolatesPositive sample for O157:H7Sorbitol fermentationPositive for O157 antigenPositive for H7 antigen

Bear550%3+++
Deer333.3%2+++
Pony114.3%2+++
Lion14.55%3+++
ElkNil1+++
DogNilNil
Horse18.3%2+++
WildcatNilNil
ZebraNil1+++
Siberia monkeyNilNil
Ostrich3100%2+++
Baboon monkeyNilNil
HyenaNil1+++
KangarooNilNil
Wolf NilNil
Camel111.1%Nil
Fox NilNil
Porcupine NilNil
Llama116.7%1+++
GoatNil2+++
Jaguar 228.6%2+++
Chicken NilNil

EHEC strains were isolated from 50% bear, 33.3% deer, 14.3% pony, 4.55% lion, 8.3% horse, 100% ostrich, 11.1% camel, 16.7% llama, and 28.6% jaguar.

The E. coli O157:H7 appears as sorbitol-nonfermented colonies on MacConkey agar (white-gray) as shown in Figure 1.

Individual isolates colonies of non-sorbitol-fermenting colonies on CT-SMAC medium were agglutinated with E. coli O157 and H7 latex reagent (Oxoid) as shown in Figures 2 and 3.

4. Discussion

This study includes the isolation of E. coli derived from twenty-two mammalian species from one zoo; this is the first report concerning the isolation of E. coli O157:H7 from petting zoo animals in Iraq.

Whereas ruminants are considered to be reservoir of E. coli O157:H7 infections, wild bird may play a key role in emergence by providing a “zoonotic pool” of the infectious agents mainly E. coli O157:H7; wild bird play an important role in dissemination of E. coli O157:H7; could be the main reservoir for E. coli O157:H7 especially gull that spreads E. coli O157:H7 to cattle and other animals [39, 40]. Other researcher [41] found that manure, rail and environmental of petting zoo animal that causes human infected cases with E. coli 0157 so that different isolated rate among animal species could be related with manure, animal food, water supply [11] contaminated with E. coli 0157 that may contaminated with feces of wild bird. The 100% carriage rate of E. coli O157:H7 in ostrich in this investigation is almost the same as that in cattle, which suggests that E. coli O157:H7 strains are probably widespread in ostrich populations. Because of the popularity of petting zoo, petting zoo animals with E. coli 0157:H7 have the potential to make large numbers of people ill.

Visitors had direct contact with animals that are potential sources of enteric pathogens. Visitors could eat and drink while interacting with animals, and, with the exception of strollers, there were no exclusions on items being brought into animal venues and visitors did not receive educational messages concerning disease risk and prevention measures.

There were insufficient hand washing signs and hand washing stations within the animal venues and midways.

Standards should outline the need for adequate hand washing facilities, appropriate disposal of manure, and proper cleaning of the environment, including rails and floors. Most of these animals did not carry E. coli 0157:H7 during the study period.

The seasonality of the incidence of E. coli O157:H7 in petting zoo animals, coupled with the increase in E. coli O157:H7 associated with food-borne illness during the summer months, suggests that environmental replication plays a key role in the epidemiology of infections [42, 43].

References

  1. L. W. Riley, R. S. Remis, S. D. Helgerson et al., “Hemmorhagic colitis associated with a rare Escherichia coli serotype,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 308, no. 12, pp. 681–685, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  2. P. M. Griffin and R. V. Tauxe, “The epidemiology of infections caused by Escherichia coli O157:H7, other enterohemorrhagic E. coli, and the associated hemolytic uremic syndrome,” Epidemiologic Reviews, vol. 13, pp. 60–98, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  3. L. Easton, “Escherichia coli O157: occurrence, transmission and laboratory detection,” British Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S. M. Parry and S. R. Palmer, “The public health significance of VTEC O157,” Journal of Applied Microbiology Symposium Supplement, vol. 88, no. 29, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  5. P. A. Chapman, D. J. Wright, and P. Norman, “Verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in Sheffield: cattle as a possible source,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 439–445, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  6. D. D. Hancock, T. E. Besser, M. L. Kinsell, P. I. Tarr, D. H. Rice, and M. G. Paros, “The prevalence of Escherichia coli O157.H7 in dairy and beef cattle in Washington state,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 199–207, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  7. P. A. Chapman, C. A. Siddons, A. T. Cerdan Malo, and M. A. Harkin, “A 1-year study of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 245–250, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. B. Trevena, R. S. Hooper, C. Wray, G. A. Willshaw, T. Cheasty, and G. Domingue, “Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 associated with companion animals,” The Veterinary Record, vol. 138, no. 16, article 400, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  9. “Waterborne outbreak of gastroenteritis associated with a contaminated municipal water supply, Walkerton, Ontario, May-June 2000,” Canada Communicable Disease Report, vol. 26, no. 20, pp. 170–173, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. N. Wetzel and J. T. LeJeune, “Isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains that do not produce Shiga toxin from bovine, avian and environmental sources,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 504–507, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Bonetta, E. Borelli, S. Bonetta, O. Conio, F. Palumbo, and E. Carraro, “Development of a PCR protocol for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. in surface water,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 177, no. 1–4, pp. 493–503, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. E. Keene, E. Sazie, J. Kok et al., “An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections traced to jerky made from deer meat,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 277, no. 15, pp. 1229–1231, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  13. L. Al-Jader, R. L. Salmon, A. M. Walker, H. M. Williams, G. A. Willshaw, and T. Cheasty, “Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 in a nursery: lessons for prevention,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 60–63, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. E. Heuvelink, C. Van Heerwaarden, R. Van Oosterom, K. Edink, and Y. T. Van Duynhoven, “Escherichia coli O157 on a farm for children,” Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde, vol. 125, no. 24, pp. 761–762, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  15. N. Pradel, V. Livrelli, C. De Champs et al., “Prevalence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle, food, and children during a one-year prospective study in France,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1023–1031, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  16. “Outbreaks of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections among children associated with farm visits in Pennsylvania and Washington, 2000,” Canada Communicable Disease Report, vol. 27, pp. 117–120, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  17. G. Duffy, “Verocytoxigenic Escherichia coli in animal faeces, manures and slurries,” Journal of Applied Microbiology Symposium Supplement, vol. 94, no. 32, pp. S94–S103, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Blanco, J. E. Blanco, J. Blanco et al., “Prevalence and characteristics of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 and other verotoxin-producing E. Coli in healthy cattle,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 251–257, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. Blanco, J. E. Blanco, J. Blanco et al., “Distribution and characterization of faecal verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) isolated from healthy cattle,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 3-4, pp. 309–319, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. G. Jackson, R. B. Goodbrand, R. P. Johnson et al., “Escherichia coli O157:H7 diarrhoea associated with well water and infected cattle on an Ontario farm,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. Johnsen, Y. Wasteson, E. Heir, O. I. Berget, and H. Herikstad, “Escherichia coli O157:H7 in faeces from cattle, sheep and pigs in the southwest part of Norway during 1998 and 1999,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 193–200, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Sheng, J. Y. Lim, M. K. Watkins, S. A. Minnich, and C. J. Hovde, “Characterization of an Eschenchia coli O157:H7 O-antigen deletion mutant and effect of the deletion on bacterial persistence in the mouse intestine and colonization at the bovine terminal rectal mucosa,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 74, no. 16, pp. 5015–5022, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. I. T. Kudva, P. G. Hatfield, and C. J. Hovde, “Characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other shiga toxin- producing E. coli serotypes isolated from sheep,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 892–899, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  24. A. E. Heuvelink, C. Van Heerwaarden, J. T. M. Zwartkruis-Nahuis et al., “Escherichia coli O157 infection associated with a petting zoo,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 295–302, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. A. Synge, “Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli: a veterinary view,” Journal of Applied Microbiology Symposium Supplement, vol. 88, no. 29, pp. S31–S37, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  26. E. Oswald, H. Schmidt, S. Morabito, H. Karch, O. Marchès, and A. Caprioli, “Typing of intimin genes in human and animal enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: characterization of a new intimin variant,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 64–71, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. D. G. Renter, J. M. Sargeant, S. E. Hygnstorm, J. D. Hoffman, and J. R. Gillespie, “Escherichia coli O157:H7 in free-ranging deer in Nebraska,” Journal of Wildlife Diseases, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 755–760, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Lenahan, S. B. O'Brien, C. Byrne et al., “Molecular characterization of Irish E. coli O157:H7 isolates of human, bovine, ovine and porcine origin,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1340–1349, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. DebRoy and E. Roberts, “Screening petting zoo animals for the presence of potentially pathogenic Escherichia coli,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 597–600, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  30. A. M. Hamzah, A. M. H. Abed AL-Reda, and J. M. Khalaf, “Prevalence of Escherichia coli O:157 and H:7 from horse feces in Baghdad, Iraq,” Online Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 96–99, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  31. D. L. Swerdlow, B. A. Woodruff, R. C. Brady et al., “A waterborne outbreak in Missouri of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with bloody diarrhea and death,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 117, no. 10, pp. 812–819, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. Gage, A. Crielly, M. Baysinger et al., “Outbreaks of Escherichia coli O157 : H7 infections among children associ-ated with farm visits—Pennsylvania and Washington,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 50, pp. 293–297, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  33. D. Helwig, “E. coli outbreak linked to fall fair,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 162, article 245, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  34. C. J. I. Payne, M. Petrovic, R. J. Roberts et al., “Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 gastroenteritis in farm visitors, North Wales,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 526–530, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  35. M. Davies, J. Engel, D. Griffin et al., “Outbreaks of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with petting zoos—North Carolina, Florida, and Arizona, 2004 and 2005,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 54, pp. 1277–1280, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  36. D. D. Hancock, T. E. Besser, D. H. Rice, E. D. Ebel, D. E. Herriott, and L. V. Carpenter, “Multiple sources of Escherichia coli O157 in feedlots and dairy farms in the Northwestern USA,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  37. G. C. Pritchard, G. A. Willshaw, J. R. Bailey, T. Carson, and T. Cheasty, “Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 on a farm open to the public: outbreak investigation and longitudinal bacteriological study,” Veterinary Record, vol. 147, no. 10, pp. 259–264, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  38. J. M. Sargeant, D. J. Hafer, J. R. Gillespie, R. D. Oberst, and S. J. A. Flood, “Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in white-tailed deer sharing rangeland with cattle,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 215, no. 6, pp. 792–794, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  39. J. S. Wallace, T. Cheasty, and K. Jones, “Isolation of Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 from wild birds,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 399–404, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  40. G. Foster, J. Evans, H. I. Knight et al., “Analysis of feces samples collected from a wild-bird garden feeding station in Scotland for the presence of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 2265–2267, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. B. Warshawsky, I. Gutmanis, B. Henry et al., “Outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 related to animal contact at a petting zoo,” Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 175–181, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  42. D. D. Hancock, T. E. Besser, D. H. Rice, D. E. Herriott, and P. I. Tarr, “A longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157 in fourteen cattle herds,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 193–195, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. Stanford, S. J. Bach, T. H. Marx et al., “Monitoring Escherichia coli O157:H7 in inoculated and naturally colonized feedlot cattle and their environment,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2005. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Aseel Mohammed Hamzah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views4840
Downloads1270
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.