Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013, Article ID 945635, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/945635
Research Article

Developing and Testing a Middle-Range Theory of the Well-Being Supportive Physical Environment of Home-Dwelling Elderly

Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 5000, 90014 Oulu, Finland

Received 22 March 2013; Accepted 23 April 2013

Academic Editors: M. Craft-Rosenberg and M. A. Rose

Copyright © 2013 Satu Elo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. McEwen, “Overview of theory in nursing,” in Theoretical Basis For Nursing, M. McEwen and E. M. Wills, Eds., pp. 23–47, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. J. Peterson and T. S. Bredow, Middle-Range Theories. Application To Nursing Research, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2009.
  3. P. A. Higgins and S. M. Moore, “Levels of theoretical thinking in nursing,” Nursing Outlook, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 179–183, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. R. Lenz, F. Suppe, A. G. Gift, L. C. Pugh, and R. A. Milligan, “Collaborative development of middle-range nursing theories: toward a theory of unpleasant symptoms,” Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Liehr and M. J. Smith, “Middle range theory: spinning research and practice to create knowledge for the new millennium,” Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 81–91, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Fawcett, “An overview of conceptual models, theories and research,” in The Relationship of Theory and Research, J. Fawcett, Ed., pp. 1–25, Davis, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Fawcett, Analysis and Evaluation of Nursing Theories, Davis, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1995.
  8. M. A. Blegen and T. Tripp-Reimer, “Implications of nursing taxonomies for middle-range theory development,” Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 37–49, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Dey, Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists, Routledge, London, UK, 1993.
  10. M. J. Smith and P. R. Liehr, Middle Range Theory For Nursing, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  11. K. N. Bent, “Seeking the both/and of a nursing research proposal,” Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 76–89, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. McKenna, Nursing Theories and Models, Routledge Essentials for Nurses, London, UK, 1997.
  13. B. M. Johnson and P. B. Webber, An Introduction To Theory and Reasoning in Nursing, Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2001.
  14. S. Lauri and H. Kyngäs, Hoitotieteen Teorian Kehittäminen (The Theory Development in Nursing Science), Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö, Vantaa, Finland, 2005.
  15. H. S. Kim, The Nature of Theoretical Thinking in Nursing, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  16. M. McEwen, “Theory development: structuring conceptual relationships in nursing,” in Theoretical Basis For Nursing, M. McEwen and E. M. Wills, Eds., pp. 69–90, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  17. P. G. Reed, N. B. C. Shearer, and L. H. Nicoll, Perspectives on Nursing Theory, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2004.
  18. S. L. Dudley-Brown, “The evaluation of nursing theory: a method for our madness,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 76–83, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Juvani, A. Isola, and H. Kyngäs, “The northern physical environment and the well-being of the elderly aged over 65 years,” International Journal of Circumpolar Health, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 246–256, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Elo, R. Saarnio, and A. Isola, “The physical, social and symbolic environment supporting the well-being of home-dwelling elderly people,” International Journal of Circumpolar Health, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 90–100, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Elo and H. Kyngäs, “The qualitative content analysis process,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 62, pp. 107–115, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  22. H. F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. H. Munro, Statistical Methods For Health Care Research, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2005.
  24. L. S. Meyers, G. Gamst, and A. J. Guarino, Applied Multivariate Research. Design and Interpretation, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2006.
  25. D. F. Polit, C. T. Beck, and S. V. Owen, “Focus on research methods: is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations,” Research in Nursing and Health, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 459–467, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. A. Pett, N. R. Lackey, and J. J. Sullivan, Making Sense of Factor Analysis. The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2003.
  27. M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, S. Elo, T. Pölkki, J. Miettunen, and H. Kyngäs, “Testing and verifying nursing science theory by confirmatory factor analysis,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1163–1172, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  28. O. Kanste, M. Kääriäinen, and H. Kyngäs, “Statistical testing of the full-range leadership theory in nursing,” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 775–782, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  29. A. J. Figueredo, S. L. Ferketich, and T. R. Knapp, “Focus on psychometrics. More on MTMM: the role of confirmatory factor analysis,” Research in Nursing and Health, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 387–391, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Elo, M. Kääriäinen, A. Isola, and H. Kyngäs, “Testing and generalicing the theory of the well-being supportive physical environment of home-dwelling elderly,” Hoitotiede, vol. 4, pp. 349–361, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  31. P. L. Chinn and M. K. Kramer, Theory and Nursing a Systematic Approach, Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 1999.