Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 135812, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/135812
Review Article

Rating and Ranking the Role of Bibliometrics and Webometrics in Nursing and Midwifery

1Johns Hopkins University (JHU), Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
2University of Technology, Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia

Received 16 August 2013; Accepted 25 September 2013; Published 6 January 2014

Academic Editors: K. Finlayson, S. Read, and M. A. Rose

Copyright © 2014 Patricia M. Davidson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. F. Polit and S. Northam, “Impact factors in nursing journals,” Nursing Outlook, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. D. Shelton and L. Leydesdorff, “Publish or patent: bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 498–511, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. McKenna, J. Daly, P. Davidson, C. Duffield, and D. Jackson, “RAE and ERA-spot the difference,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 375–377, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. C. Dougherty, S.-Y. Lin, H. P. Mckenna, K. Seers, and S. Keeney, “Analysis of international content of ranked nursing journals in 2005 using ex post facto design,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1358–1369, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Ketefian and M. C. Freda, “Impact factors and citations counts: a state of disquiet,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 751–752, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Goltaji and M. S. Shirazi, “The situation of top research centers' websites in the Islamic world countries: a webometric study,” International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), vol. 10, pp. 71–85, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. E. Garfield, “The agony and the ecstasy: the history and meaning of the journal impact factor,” in Proceedings of the International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2005.
  8. C. Schloegl and J. Gorraiz, “Global usage versus global citation metrics: the case of pharmacology journals,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 161–170, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. A. Crookes, S. L. Reis, and S. C. Jones, “The development of a ranking tool for refereed journals in which nursing and midwifery researchers publish their work,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 420–427, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. R. Smith, “A longitudinal analysis of bibliometric and impact factor trends among the core international journals of nursing, 1977–2008,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1491–1499, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M.-J. Johnstone, “Journal impact factors: implications for the nursing profession: original article,” International Nursing Review, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. E. Hirsch, “An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 46, pp. 16569–16572, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. F. Hack, D. Crooks, J. Plohman, and E. Kepron, “Research citation analysis of nursing academics in Canada: identifying success indicators,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 2542–2549, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. E. Hunt, M. Cleary, D. Jackson, R. Watson, and D. R. Thompson, “Citation analysis: focus on leading Australian nurse authors,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 20, no. 23-24, pp. 3273–3275, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. R. Thompson and R. Watson, “H-indices and the performance of professors of nursing in the UK,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 19, no. 21-22, pp. 2957–2958, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. F. Taber, “Quantifying publication impact,” Science, vol. 309, no. 5744, p. 2166, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Wilkes and D. Jackson, “Trends in publication of research papers by Australian-based nurse authors,” Collegian, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 125–130, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. R. Thompson and A. M. Clark, “The five top bad reasons nurses don't publish in impactful journals,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 68, pp. 1675–1678, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. G. E. Hunt, B. Happell, S. W. C. Chan, and M. Cleary, “Citation analysis of mental health nursing journals: how should we rank thee?” International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 576–580, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Payne, J. Seymour, G. Grande et al., “An evaluation of research capacity building from the Cancer Experiences Collaborative,” BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, vol. 2, pp. 280–285, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. P. M. Ironside, “Advancing the science of nursing education: rethinking the meaning and significance of impact factors,” Journal of continuing education in nursing, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 99–100, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Leydesdorff and L. Bornmann, “Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: an alternative research design with policy implications,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2133–2146, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Minimatts Marketing Group, “Internet World Stats,” 2012.
  24. J. Priem and B. M. Hemminger, “Scientometrics 2.0: toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web,” First Monday, vol. 15, no. 7, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Graf, “What IJCP authors think about open access: exploring one possible future for publishing clinical research in a general and internal medicine journal,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 116–118, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Armstrong, M. Berry, and R. Lamshed, “Blogs as electronic learning journals,” E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  27. L. Björneborn and P. Ingwersen, “Toward a basic framework for webometrics,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 55, no. 14, pp. 1216–1227, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. Kousha, M. Thelwall, and S. Rezaie, “Using the Web for research evaluation: the Integrated Online Impact indicator,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 124–135, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. C. Almind and P. Ingwersen, “Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 404–426, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Thelwall, “Bibliometrics to webometrics,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 605–621, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng, “Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities,” in Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop 2007 on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, pp. 56–65, San Jose, Calif, USA, August 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Eysenbach, “Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 13, no. 4, Article ID e123, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Priem and K. L. Costello, How and Why Scholars Cite on Twitter, ASIST, Pittsburg, Pa, USA, 2010.
  34. J. L. S. Yan and E. Kaziunas, “What is a tweet worth? Measuring the value of social media for an academic institution,” in Proceedings of the iConference: Culture, Design, Society (iConference '12), pp. 565–566, Ontario, Canada, February 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. Bandari, S. Asur, and B. Huberman, “The pulse of news in social media: forecasting popularity,” in Proceedings of the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Dublin, Ireland, June 2012.
  36. Klout, “Klout: the standard for influence,” 2012, http://klout.com.
  37. PeerIndex, “PeerIndex Scoring Methodology,” 2012, http://www.peerindex.com/help/scores.
  38. Kred, “The Kred Guide,” 2012.
  39. S. McKay, “Social policy excellence-peer review or metrics? Analyzing the 2008 research assessment exercise in social work and social policy and administration,” Social Policy and Administration, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 526–543, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. National Institutes of Health, “The NIH Public access policy,” 2012http://publicaccess.nih.gov/.
  41. R. Watson, M. Cleary, D. Jackson, and G. E. Hunt, “Open access and online publishing: a new frontier in nursing?” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 68, pp. 1905–1908, 2012. View at Google Scholar