Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 154197, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/154197
Research Article

Gas Production Strategy of Underground Coal Gasification Based on Multiple Gas Sources

Duan Tianhong,1,2,3 Wang Zuotang,1,2,3 Zhou Limin,1,2,3 and Li Dongdong1,2,3

1School of Mining Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Jiangsu, Xuzhou 221116, China
2State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Mine Safety, China University of Mining and Technology, Jiangsu, Xuzhou 221116, China
3Key Laboratory of Deep Coal Resource Mining, Ministry of Education of China, Jiangsu, Xuzhou 221116, China

Received 20 January 2014; Accepted 22 May 2014; Published 9 July 2014

Academic Editor: Adolfo Iulianelli

Copyright © 2014 Duan Tianhong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Saima, Y. Mogi, and T. Haraoka, “Development of PSA system for the recovery of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide from blast furnace gas in steel works,” Energy Procedia, vol. 37, pp. 7152–7159, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. D. S. Machado, A. S. Mexias, A. C. F. Vilela, and E. Osorio, “Study of coal, char and coke fines structures and their proportions in the off-gas blast furnace samples by X-ray diffraction,” Fuel, vol. 114, pp. 224–228, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Chen, M. Lin, T. Leu, and S. Du, “An evaluation of hydrogen production from the perspective of using blast furnace gas and coke oven gas as feedstocks,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 18, pp. 11727–11737, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Chen, M. Lin, A. B. Yu, S. Du, and T. Leu, “Hydrogen production from steam reforming of coke oven gas and its utility for indirect reduction of iron oxides in blast furnace,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 11748–11758, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. G. Pugh, T. O'Doherty, A. J. Griffiths, P. J. Bowen, A. P. Crayford, and R. Marsh, “Sensitivity to change in laminar burning velocity and Markstein length resulting from variable hydrogen fraction in blast furnace gas for changing ambient conditions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 3459–3470, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A.-H. Wang, J.-J. Cai, X.-P. Li, D. Wang, and Q.-A. Zhou, “Affecting factors and improving measures for converter gas recovery,” Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 22–26, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Wang, L. Xie, G. Luo, Q. Zhou, and I. Angelidaki, “Performance and microbial community analysis of the anaerobic reactor with coke oven gas biomethanation and in situ biogas upgrading,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 146, pp. 234–239, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. G. Shen, P. P. Chen, and A. Q. Li, “Effect of three processes on CO2 and O2 simultaneously reforming of coke oven gas to syngas,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 75, pp. 75–80, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. M. Bermúdez, A. Arenillas, and J. A. Menéndez, “Equilibrium prediction of CO2 reforming of coke oven gas: suitability for methanol production,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 82, pp. 95–103, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Chen, and L. Li, “Thermodynamic and kinetic model of reforming coke-oven gas with steam,” Energy, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 3103–3108, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Bermúdez, B. Fidalgo, A. Arenillas, and J. A. Menéndez, “Dry reforming of coke oven gases over activated carbon to produce syngas for methanol synthesis,” Fuel, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 2897–2902, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. M. Bermúdez, B. Fidalgo, A. Arenillas, and J. A. Menéndez, “CO2 reforming of coke oven gas over a Ni/γAl2O3 catalyst to produce syngas for methanol synthesis,” Fuel, vol. 94, pp. 197–203, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Razzaq, C. Li, and S. Zhang, “Coke oven gas: availability, properties, purification, and utilization in China,” Fuel, vol. 113, pp. 287–299, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Zhang, J. Liu, W. Ding, and X. Lu, “Performance of an oxygen-permeable membrane reactor for partial oxidation of methane in coke oven gas to syngas,” Fuel, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 324–330, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Bermúdez, N. Ferrera-Lorenzo, S. Luque, A. Arenillas, and J. A. Menéndez, “New process for producing methanol from coke oven gas by means of CO 2 reforming. Comparison with conventional process,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 115, pp. 215–221, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Yue, X. Wang, X. Ai et al., “Catalytic reforming of model tar compounds from hot coke oven gas with low steam/carbon ratio over Ni/MgO-Al2O3 catalysts,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1098–1104, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. M. Bermúdez, A. Arenillas, and J. A. Menéndez, “Syngas from CO2 reforming of coke oven gas: synergetic effect of activated carbon/Ni-γAl2O3 catalyst,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 21, pp. 13361–13368, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Cheng, X. Lu, D. Hu, Y. Zhang, W. Ding, and H. Zhao, “Hydrogen production by catalytic partial oxidation of coke oven gas in BaCo0.7Fe0.2Nb0.1O3-δ membranes with surface modification,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 528–538, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Joseck, M. Wang, and Y. Wu, “Potential energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of hydrogen production from coke oven gas in U.S. steel mills,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1445–1454, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Yang, W. Ding, Y. Zhang, X. Lu, Y. Zhang, and P. Shen, “Catalytic partial oxidation of coke oven gas to syngas in an oxygen permeation membrane reactor combined with NiO/MgO catalyst,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 6239–6247, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Zhang, K. Su, F. Zeng, W. Ding, and X. Lu, “A novel tubular oxygen-permeable membrane reactor for partial oxidation of CH4 in coke oven gas to syngas,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 21, pp. 8783–8789, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Z. Zhang, B. Lin, G. Li, and Q. Ye, “Coke oven gas explosion suppression,” Safety Science, vol. 55, pp. 81–87, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Q. Hong-Hui and F. Heng-Fu, “Advances in the methanation of coke oven gas technology,” Metal World, vol. 4, pp. 78–80, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. B. Olateju and A. Kumar, “Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands,” Applied Energy, vol. 111, pp. 428–440, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. W. Bhutto, A. A. Bazmi, and G. Zahedi, “Underground coal gasification: from fundamentals to applications,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 189–214, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Kempka, M. Plötz, R. Schlüter, J. Hamann, S. A. Deowan, and R. Azzam, “Carbon dioxide utilisation for carbamide production by application of the coupled UCG-Urea process,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, pp. 2200–2205, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Seifi, J. Abedi, and Z. Chen, “Application of porous medium approach to simulate UCG process,” Fuel, vol. 116, pp. 191–200, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. X.-J. Yang, Advanced Local Fractional Calculus and Its Applications, World Science, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  29. L. Yang, “Study of the model experiment of blinding-hole UCG,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 11–25, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Yang, X. Zhang, S. Liu, L. Yu, and W. Zhang, “Field test of large-scale hydrogen manufacturing from underground coal gasification (UCG),” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1275–1285, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. V. Kreynin, “An analysis of new generation coal gasification projects,” International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 509–515, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus