Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 185269, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/185269
Research Article

Automatic Three-Dimensional Measurement of Large-Scale Structure Based on Vision Metrology

1College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Image Measurement and Vision Navigation, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received 8 November 2013; Accepted 31 December 2013; Published 17 February 2014

Academic Editors: Y. Fu and G. Pedrini

Copyright © 2014 Zhaokun Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. L. Window and G. S. Holister, Strain Gauge Technology, Applied Science, 1982.
  2. M. Bertrand, J. Meunier, M. Doucet, and G. Ferland, “Ultrasonic biochemical strain gauge based on speckle tracking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 859–863, IEEE, October 1989. View at Scopus
  3. W. F. Caspary and J. M. Rüeger, Concepts of Network and Deformation Analysis, University of New South Wales, 1987.
  4. K. L. Feigl, D. C. Agnew, Y. Bock et al., “Space geodetic measurement of crustal deformation in central and southern California, 1984–1992,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 21677–21712, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. M. Larson and D. C. Agnew, “Application of the global position system to crustal deformation measurement 1. Precision and accuracy,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 16547–16565, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Q. Wang, P.-Z. Zhang, J. T. Freymueller et al., “Present-day crustal deformation in China constrained by global positioning system measurements,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5542, pp. 574–577, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. W. Lovse, W. F. Teskey, G. Lachapelle, and M. E. Cannon, “Dynamic deformation monitoring of tall structure using GPS technology,” Journal of Surveying Engineering, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Luhmann, S. Robson, S. Kyle, and I. Harley, Close Range Photogrammetry: Principles, Methods and Applications, Whittles, 2006.
  9. C. S. Fraser and S. Cronk, “A hybrid measurement approach for close-range photogrammetry,” Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 328–333, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Ganci and H. Handley, “Automation in videogrammetry,” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 32, pp. 53–58, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. Fraser, S. Cronk, and H. Hanley, Close-Range Photogrammetry in Traffic Incident Management, 2008.
  12. C. Fraser, “Automated vision metrology: a mature technology for industrial inspection and engineering surveys,” Australian Surveyor, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. S. Fraser, D. Brizzi, and A. Hira, Vision-Based, Multi-Epoch Deformation Monitoring of the Atrium of Federation Square, 2003.
  14. S. J. Ahn, W. Rauh, and S. I. Kim, “Circular coded target for automation of optical 3D-measurement and camera calibration,” International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 905–919, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. J. Ahn and M. Schultes, “A new circular coded target for the automation of photogrammetric 3D-surface measurements,” in Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques IV, A. Gruen and H. Kahmen, Eds., pp. 225–234, Herbert Wichmann, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  16. F. Gaspard, S. Naudet, E. Noirfalise, and P. Sayd, “Coded target and photogrammetry method using such targets,” Google Patents, 2008.
  17. A. K. Vladimir and S. Alexander, Non-Contact 3D Model Reconstruction Using Coded Target, 1998.
  18. D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Bay, A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars, and L. van Gool, “Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF),” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 346–359, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Tola, V. Lepetit, and P. Fua, “DAISY: an efficient dense descriptor applied to wide-baseline stereo,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 815–830, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Nistér, “An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 756–770, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Hartley and A. Zisserman, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  23. M. I. A. Lourakis and A. A. Argyros, “SBA: a software package for generic sparse bundle adjustment,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 36, no. 1, article 2, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Triggs, P. F. McLauchlan, R. I. Hartley, and A. W. Fitzgibbon, “Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis,” in Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice, B. Triggs, A. Zisserman, and R. Szeliski, Eds., vol. 1883 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 298–372, Springer, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. C. S. Fraser, “Network orientation models for image-based 3D measurement,” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing & Spasial Information Science, vol. 36, no. 5, p. 9, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  26. T. Lindeberg, “Scale-space theory: a basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 21, 1-2, pp. 225–270, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Lindeberg, “Feature detection with automatic scale selection,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 79–116, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Schaffalitzky and A. Zisserman, “Multi-view matching for unordered image sets, or ‘How do I organize my holiday snaps?’,” in Computer Vision—ECCV 2002, A. Heyden, G. Sparr, M. Nielsen, and P. Johansen, Eds., vol. 2350 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 414–431, Springer, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar