Table 8: Numerical comparison between the results obtained with CDM and [27, 28, 32] of a DWCNT and for different values of parameter .

Boundary condition

Simply supported
  [32]3.099
  [27]3.146.279.35
  [28]3.1416.2659.276
 C.D.M.3.1416.2658.275
 R-R3.141
  [32]3.026
  [27]3.075.788.01
  [28]3.0685.7707.976
 C.D.M.3.0685.7808.036
 R-R3.068
Clamped
  [32]4.482
  [27]4.737.8210.82
  [28]4.7267.79610.654
 C.D.M.4.7267.79610.653
 R-S4.732
  [32]4.359
  [27]4.597.129.19
  [28]4.5907.1059.123
 C.D.M.4.5937.1379.251
 R-S4.596
Propped
  [32]3.802
  [27]3.937.0510.09
  [28]3.9257.0359.981
 C.D.M.3.9257.0359.981
 R-S3.965
  [32]3.701
  [27]3.826.458.60
  [28]3.8196.4448.557
 C.D.M.3.8206.4638.643
 R-S3.853
Cantilever
  [32]1.884.697.82
  [27]1.8754.6907.797
 C.D.M.1.8754.6907.797
  [27]1.884.557.13
  [28]1.8794.5447.111
 C.D.M.1.8794.5477.143