Research Article
The Use of Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Dissolution Kinetics
Table 3
Comparison of various backpropagation algorithms using different transfer function (test).
| Training function | Transfer function | One hidden layer | Two hidden layers | | RMSE | MAE | | RMSE | MAE |
| LM backpropagation | tansig | 0.9933 | 0.0121 | 0.0099 | 0.819 | 0.0641 | 0.0374 | LM backpropagation | logsig | 0.9921 | 0.0135 | 0.0110 | 0.9975 | 0.0073 | 0.0061 | LM backpropagation | radbas | 0.4391 | 0.1320 | 0.0990 | 0.5056 | 0.4184 | 0.3963 | Bayesian regulation backpropagation | tansig | 0.9945 | 0.0113 | 0.0091 | 0.9938 | 0.0120 | 0.0098 | Bayesian regulation backpropagation | logsig | 0.9854 | 0.0167 | 0.0133 | 0.9951 | 0.0102 | 0.0081 | Bayesian regulation backpropagation | radbas | 0.9946 | 0.0117 | 0.0101 | 0.9965 | 0.0090 | 0.0069 | BFGS quasi-Newton backpropagation | tansig | 0.9876 | 0.0167 | 0.0116 | 0.9909 | 0.0136 | 0.0120 | BFGS quasi-Newton backpropagation | logsig | 0.9839 | 0.0189 | 0.0116 | 0.9882 | 0.0150 | 0.0128 | BFGS quasi-Newton backpropagation | radbas | 0.0724 | 0.2041 | 0.0981 | 0.5832 | 0.1397 | 0.0688 |
|
|