Research Article
An Empirical Study of Different Approaches for Protein Classification
Table 9
Comparison with the state-of-the-art using AUC as performance indicator.
| AUC | Datasets | Methods | HU | PF | GP | GR | VR | DNA | ENZ | MEM | GO | SL | HI | AD | VI1 | VI2 |
| [48] | | | | | | | | | | | | 77.0 | 87.0 | 83.4 | [58] | | | | | | 93.3 | 72.5 | | 50.0 | | | | | | [12] | 72.5 | | 99.7 | 94.7 | 82.5 | | | 96.0 | | | | 82.9 | 86.1 | 76.0 | [59] | | | | | | | | | | | 98.2 | | | | [34] | | | | | | | | | | | | 81.6 | 91.2 | 84.1 | [28] | | | | | | 95.9 | 79.4 | 96.8 | | 93.8 | 98.0 | | 87.1 | 87.9 | FUS1 | 82.0 | 92.7 | 99.9 | 92.3 | 84.7 | 97.2 | 80.2 | 97.1 | 83.8 | 96.7 | 98.4 | 88.2 | 89.0 | 88.7 |
|
|