Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 240983, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/240983
Research Article

A Generalized Quantum-Inspired Decision Making Model for Intelligent Agent

Advanced Robotic Lab, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Received 1 December 2013; Accepted 19 February 2014; Published 17 March 2014

Academic Editors: Z. Chen and F. Yu

Copyright © 2014 Yuhuang Hu and Chu Kiong Loo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Tenenbaum and T. L. Griffiths, “Generalization, similarity, and bayesianinference,” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 629–791, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  2. O. Cappe, E. Moulines, and T. Ryden, Inference in Hidden Markov Models, Springer, 1st edition, 2005.
  3. E. Shafir and A. Tversky, “Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 449–474, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Li and J. Taplin, “Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in prisoner's dilemma games,” Chinese Journal of Psychology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 25–46, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment,” Psychological Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 293–315, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. W. Carlson and J. F. Yates, “Disjunction errors in qualitative likelihood judgment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 368–379, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Tversky and D. J. Koehler, “Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability,” Psychological Review, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 547–567, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. S. Wyer Jr., “An investigation of the relations among probability estimates,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. M. Hogarth and H. J. Einhorn, “Order effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Tversky and E. Shafir, “The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty,” Psychological Science, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 305–309, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. E. M. Pothos and J. R. Busemeyer, “A quantum probability explanation for violations of “rational” decision theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 276, no. 1665, pp. 2171–2178, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. S. Trueblood and J. R. Busemeyer, “A quantum probability account of order effects in inference,” Cognitive Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1518–1552, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. S. Trueblood and J. R. Busemeyer, “A quantum probability model of causal reasoning,” Frontiers in Cognitive Science, vol. 3, article 138, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. R. Busemeyer and P. D. Bruza, Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  15. R. T. A. Croson, “The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 118–133, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. R. Buesmeyer, M. Matthew, and Z. Wang, “Quantum game theory explanation of disjunction effects,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 131–135, 2006.