Design and Experimental Validation for Direct-Drive Fault-Tolerant Permanent-Magnet Vernier Machines

<table>Variation of minimum flux density in PMs with PM radial thickness <svg height="18.112499" id="M144" style="vertical-align:-5.03984pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 31.487499 18.112499" width="31.487499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.112)"><path d="M865 650q-1 -4 -4 -14t-4 -14q-62 -5 -77 -19.5t-29 -82.5l-74 -394q-12 -61 -0.5 -77t75.5 -21l-6 -28h-273l8 28q64 5 82 21t29 76l36 198h-380l-37 -197q-11 -64 0.5 -78.5t79.5 -19.5l-6 -28h-268l6 28q60 6 75.5 21.5t26.5 76.5l75 394q13 66 2 81.5t-77 20.5l8 28
h263l-6 -28q-58 -5 -75.5 -21t-30.5 -81l-26 -153h377l29 153q12 67 2 81t-74 21l5 28h268z" id="x1D43B"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,14.975,15.187)"><path d="M169 380l92 53q26 16 49 16q80 0 128.5 -56t48.5 -133q0 -108 -72.5 -180.5t-176.5 -91.5q-38 1 -69 18v-131q0 -57 13 -70t71 -18v-27h-236v27q49 5 61 17t12 61v452q0 48 -9.5 58.5t-56.5 16.5v24q66 11 145 43v-79zM169 346v-270q37 -39 94 -39q63 0 101.5 50
t38.5 134q0 78 -38.5 123t-95.5 45q-45 0 -100 -43z" id="x70"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,21.067,15.187)"><path d="M797 0h-214v26q46 5 58 17.5t12 63.5v167q0 116 -88 116q-48 0 -112 -52q3 -18 3 -42v-195q0 -46 11 -58t53 -17v-26h-214v26q48 5 59.5 17t11.5 60v172q0 115 -88 115q-47 0 -109 -52v-235q0 -47 10 -59.5t48 -17.5v-26h-211v26q50 5 62.5 17t12.5 60v207q0 48 -9 59.5
t-52 18.5v23q79 14 139 41v-81q3 2 29 20.5t44 29.5q45 28 81 28t66 -22t46 -61q25 20 83 57q39 26 76 26q59 0 93 -40t34 -113v-193q0 -49 10.5 -60.5t54.5 -16.5v-26z" id="x6D"></path></g>
</svg>.</table>

The Scientific World Journal

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: Design and Experimental Validation for Direct-Drive Fault-Tolerant Permanent-Magnet Vernier Machines 