Interactive Reference Point Procedure Based on the Conic Scalarizing Function

Table 14

Comparison of the results of the a priori method, the a posteriori method, and the proposed method.

Criteria/methods	The a priori method	The a posteriori method	The proposed method
Number of the solved subproblems	1	650	14
𝑓(𝑥^∗)=(𝑓1(𝑥^∗),𝑓2(𝑥^∗))	(0.7995, 0.6007)	(0.7071, 0.7071)	(0.75, 0.6614)
UT(𝑓(𝑥^∗))	0.6441	0.6450	0.64725