Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 259547, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/259547
Research Article

The Effect of Different Types of Walking on Dual-Task Performance and Task Prioritization among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

1Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905 Haifa, Israel
2Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905 Haifa, Israel
3Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905 Haifa, Israel
4Department of Occupational Therapy, Sheba Medical Center, 5262000 Tel Hashomer, Israel

Received 24 July 2014; Revised 5 November 2014; Accepted 10 November 2014; Published 23 November 2014

Academic Editor: Graziano Onder

Copyright © 2014 Maayan Agmon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. B. Liston, J. H. Bergmann, N. Keating, D. A. Green, and M. Pavlou, “Postural prioritization is differentially altered in healthy older compared to younger adults during visual and auditory coded spatial multitasking,” Gait and Posture, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 198–204, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. M. Hausdorff, A. Schweiger, T. Herman, G. Yogev-Seligmann, and N. Giladi, “Dual-task decrements in gait: contributing factors among healthy older adults,” The Journals of Gerontology—Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1335–1343, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Liu-Ambrose, L. A. Katarynych, M. C. Ashe, L. S. Nagamatsu, and L. H. Chun, “Dual-task gait performance among community-dwelling senior women: the role of balance confidence and executive functions,” Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 975–982, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Yogev-Seligmann, J. M. Hausdorff, and N. Giladi, “The role of executive function and attention in gait,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 329–342, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Zijlstra, T. Ufkes, D. A. Skelton, L. Lundin-Olsson, and W. Zijlstra, “Do dual tasks have an added value over single tasks for balance assessment in fall prevention programs? A mini-review,” Gerontology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Hauer, C. Marburger, and P. Oster, “Motor performance deteriorates with simultaneously performed cognitive tasks in geriatric patients,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 217–223, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Al-Yahya, H. Dawes, L. Smith, A. Dennis, K. Howells, and J. Cockburn, “Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 715–728, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Simoni, G. Rubbieri, M. Baccini et al., “Different motor tasks impact differently on cognitive performance of older persons during dual task tests,” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 692–696, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Doumas, M. A. Rapp, and R. T. Krampe, “Working memory and postural control: adult age differences in potential for improvement, task priority, and dual tasking,” Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 193–201, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Masumoto, S.-I. Takasugi, N. Hotta, K. Fujishima, and Y. Iwamoto, “A comparison of muscle activity and heart rate response during backward and forward walking on an underwater treadmill,” Gait and Posture, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Lee, J. Kim, J. Son, and Y. Kim, “Kinematic and kinetic analysis during forward and backward walking,” Gait and Posture, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 674–678, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Laufer, “Effect of age on characteristics of forward and backward gait at preferred and accelerated walking speed,” Journals of Gerontology. Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 627–632, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. V. E. Kelly, A. J. Eusterbrock, and A. Shumway-Cook, “Factors influencing dynamic prioritization during dual-task walking in healthy young adults,” Gait and Posture, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 131–134, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. G. Brauer, M. Woollacott, and A. Shumway-Cook, “The influence of a concurrent cognitive task on the compensatory stepping response to a perturbation in balance-impaired and healthy elders,” Gait and Posture, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Yogev-Seligmann, J. M. Hausdorff, and N. Giladi, “Do we always prioritize balance when walking? Towards an integrated model of task prioritization,” Movement Disorders, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 765–770, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Montero-Odasso, J. Verghese, O. Beauchet, and J. M. Hausdorff, “Gait and cognition: a complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2127–2136, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. S. Nasreddine, N. A. Phillips, V. Bédirian et al., “The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 695–699, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. A. Luis, A. P. Keegan, and M. Mullan, “Cross validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the Southeastern US,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 197–201, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Franchignoni, F. Horak, M. Godi, A. Nardone, and A. Giordano, “Using psychometric techniques to improve the balance evaluation systems test: the mini-bestest,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 323–331, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Godi, F. Franchignoni, M. Caligari, A. Giordano, A. M. Turcato, and A. Nardone, “Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Mini-BESTest and berg balance scale in patients with balance disorders,” Physical Therapy, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 158–167, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Shumway-Cook, S. Brauer, and M. Woollacott, “Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up and go test,” Physical Therapy, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 896–903, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Sage, 2013.
  23. T. L. Hooper, D. M. Dunn, J. E. Props, B. A. Bruce, S. F. Sawyer, and J. A. Daniel, “The effects of graded forward and backward walking on heart rate and oxygen consumption,” Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 65–71, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Handford, Energy Optimality in Novel Movement: Sideways Walking, The Ohio State University.
  25. I. Melzer, N. Benjuya, and J. Kaplanski, “Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers,” Age and Ageing, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 602–607, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus