Research Article
Evolutionary Computation with Spatial Receding Horizon Control to Minimize Network Coding Resources
Table 7
The importance of terminal penalty in objective function for SRHCGAs.
| | (Based on the typical () pairs given in Table 6) | Case I-1 | Case I-2 | Case II-1 | Case II-2 | Case II-3 | Case II-4 |
| | SRHCGA1 | | | | | | | | With terminal penalty | 115.10 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 116.94 | | Without terminal penalty | 69.47 | 165.77 | 220.35 | 203.71 | 104.68 | 32.07 |
| | SRHCGA2 | | | | | | | | With terminal penalty | 98.17 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 140.07 | | Without terminal penalty | 47.29 | 144.75 | 228.60 | 185.95 | 123.66 | 40.51 |
| | SRHCGA3 | | | | | | | | With terminal penalty | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | | Without terminal penalty | 159.55 | 172.81 | 231.92 | 222.90 | 195.85 | 147.62 |
|
|
