Research Article
Evolutionary Computation with Spatial Receding Horizon Control to Minimize Network Coding Resources
Table 8
The influence of pool size on performance of SRHCGAs.
| (Based on the typical ( pairs given in Table 6) | Pool size | Case I-1 | Case I-2 | Case II-1 | Case II-2 | Case II-3 | Case II-4 |
| SRHCGA1 | 1 | 40.53 | 116.38 | 217.44 | 179.36 | 122.97 | 43.47 | 5% a GA population | 110.47 | 214.61 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 221.85 | 122.73 | 10% a GA population | 115.10 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 116.94 | 20% a GA population | 101.26 | 225.36 | 240.00 | 233.85 | 217.81 | 98.48 |
| SRHCGA2 | 1 | 49.38 | 100.94 | 225.63 | 194.95 | 151.38 | 51.55 | 5% a GA population | 76.86 | 230.44 | 240.00 | 236.04 | 213.25 | 118.87 | 10% a GA population | 98.17 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 140.07 | 20% a GA population | 108.47 | 226.75 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 133.79 |
| SRHCGA3 | 1 | 167.53 | 182.44 | 232.35 | 235.11 | 194.69 | 151.36 | 5% a GA population | 233.85 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 229.74 | 10% a GA population | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 20% a GA population | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 |
|
|