Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 274516, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/274516
Review Article

Comparison of Clinical Safety and Outcomes of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis

Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

Received 2 April 2014; Revised 21 June 2014; Accepted 30 June 2014; Published 14 July 2014

Academic Editor: Germana Casaccia

Copyright © 2014 Min-Wei Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Halldestam, E.-. Enell, E. Kullman, and K. Borch, “Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 734–738, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. S. Litynski, Highlights in the History of Laparoscopy, Barbara Bernert, Frankfurt, Germany, 1996.
  3. D. R. Baird, J. P. Wilson, E. M. Mason et al., “An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital,” American Surgeon, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 206–210, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. G. Wilson, I. M. C. Macintyre, S. J. Nixon, J. H. Saunders, J. S. Varma, and P. M. King, “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis,” British Medical Journal, vol. 305, no. 6850, pp. 394–396, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. M. Wiesen, S. W. Unger, J. S. Barkin, D. S. Edelman, J. S. Scott, and H. M. Unger, “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for acute cholecystitis,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 334–337, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Kiviluoto, J. Sirén, P. Luukkonen, and E. Kivilaakso, “Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis,” The Lancet, vol. 351, no. 9099, pp. 321–325, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. N. Gutt, J. Encke, J. Köninger et al., “Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304),” Annals of Surgery, vol. 258, no. 3, pp. 385–393, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. P. Yadav, S. Adhikary, C. S. Agrawal, B. Bhattarai, R. K. Gupta, and A. Ghimire, “A comparative study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis,” Kathmandu University Medical Journal, vol. 7, no. 25, pp. 16–20, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. B. Kolla, S. Aggarwal, A. Kumar et al., “Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1323–1327, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Johansson, A. Thune, A. Blomqvist, L. Nelvin, and L. Lundell, “Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 642–645, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Davila, C. Manzanares, M. L. Picho, P. Albors, F. Cardenas, and E. Fuster, “Experience in the treatment (early vs. delayed) of acute cholecystitis via laparoscopy,” Cirugía Española, vol. 66, supplement 1, p. 233, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. B. S. Lai, K. H. Kwong, K. L. Leung et al., “Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 764–767, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. M. Lo, C. L. Liu, S. T. Fan, E. C. S. Lai, and J. Wong, “Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 227, no. 4, pp. 461–467, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Siddiqui, A. MacDonald, P. S. Chong, and J. T. Jenkins, “Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. S. Gurusamy, C. Davidson, C. Gluud, and B. R. Davidson, “Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 6, Article ID CD005440, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. P. T. Higgins and S. G. Thompson, “Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1539–1558, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. J. Newell, “Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 837–841, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. L. Kjaergard, J. Villumsen, and C. Gluud, “Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 135, no. 11, pp. 982–989, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. F. Schulz, L. Chalmers, R. J. Hayes, and D. G. Altman, “Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 273, no. 5, pp. 408–412, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Moher, B. Pham, A. Jones et al., “Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?” The Lancet, vol. 352, no. 9128, pp. 609–613, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. K. Sicklick, M. S. Camp, K. D. Lillemoe et al., “Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperotive results in 200 patients,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 241, no. 5, pp. 786–795, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. W. Rattner, C. Ferguson, and A. L. Warshaw, “Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 217, no. 3, pp. 233–236, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. S. Bender and M. E. Zenilman, “Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy as definitive therapy for acute cholecystitis,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1081–1084, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Norrby, P. Herlin, T. Holmin, R. Sjödahl, and C. Tagesson, “Early or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 163–165, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. J. Järvinen and J. Hästbacka, “Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 501–505, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. S. Serralta, J. L. Bueno, M. R. Planells, and D. R. Rodero, “Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 71–75, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Y. Lee, J. J. Carter, M. S. Hochberg, A. M. Stone, S. L. Cohen, and H. L. Pachter, “The timing of surgery for cholecystitis: a review of 202 consecutive patients at a large municipal hospital,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 195, no. 4, pp. 467–470, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus