Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 274949, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/274949
Research Article

Ontology-Based Multiple Choice Question Generation

Information Technology Department, College of Computer & Information Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 51178, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia

Received 4 October 2013; Accepted 27 February 2014; Published 26 March 2014

Academic Editors: J. Shu and F. Yu

Copyright © 2014 Maha Al-Yahya. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Al-Yahya, “OntoQue: a question generation engine for educational assesment based on domain ontologies,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT '11), pp. 393–395, Athens, Ga, USA, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Knouf, “Transformation of bibTeX into an OWL ontology,” 2003, http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2004/Contest/301/onto.html.
  3. A. Papasalouros, K. Kanaris, and K. Kotis, “Automatic generation of multiple choice questions from domain ontologies,” in Proceedings of the IADIS e-Learning Conference, pp. 427–434, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 2008. View at Scopus
  4. J. C. Brown, G. A. Frishkoff, and M. Eskenazi, “Automatic question generation for vocabulary assessment,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 819–826, Stroudsburg, Pa, USA, October 2005. View at Scopus
  5. R. Mitkov, L. A. Ha, and N. Karamanis, “A computer-aided environment for generating multiple-choice test items,” Natural Language Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 177–194, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. H. Wolfe, “An Aid to Independent Study through Automatic Question Generation (AUTOQUEST),” October 1975.
  7. T. Hirashima, “Metadata editor of exercise problems for intelligent e-learning,” in Proceedings of the Workshop Notes of Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning at (ISWC '04), pp. 99–101, Hirosjima, Japan, 2004.
  8. D. Gates, “Generating look-back strategy questions from expository texts,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge, Arlington, Va, USA, 2008.
  9. A. N. Kumar, “Generation of problems, answers, grade, and feedback—case study of a fully automated tutor,” ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, vol. 5, no. 3, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Ou, C. Orasan, D. Mekhaldi, and L. Hasler, “Automatic question pattern generation for ontology-based question answering,” in Proceedings of the 21th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS '08), pp. 183–188, Menlo Park, Calif, USA, May 2008. View at Scopus
  11. E. Hovy, L. Gerber, U. Hermjakob, C. Lin, and D. Ravichandran, “Toward Semantics-Based Answer Pinpointing,” 2001.
  12. C. Fellbaum, WordNet, MIT Press, 1998.
  13. A. Corbett and J. Mostow, “Automating comprehension questions: lessons from a reading tutor,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge, Arlington, Va, USA, 2008.
  14. R. Mitkov, L. A. Ha, and N. Karamanis, “A computer-aided environment for generating multiple-choice test items,” Natural Language Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 177–194, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Silveira, “Towards a framework for question generation,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge, Arlington, Va, USA, 2008.
  16. L. Stanescu, C. S. Spahiu, A. Ion, and A. Spahiu, “Question generation for learning evaluation,” in Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology (IMCSIT '08), pp. 509–513, Wisla, Poland, October 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. Cecila Alves, J. Mark Gierl, and Lai Hollis, “Using automated item generation to promote principled test design and development,” in Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association (AERA '10), Denver, Colo, USA, 2010.
  18. M. J. Gierl, J. Zhou, and C. Alves, “Developing a taxonomy of item model types to promote assessment engineering,” Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–50, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Holohan, M. Melia, D. McMullen, and C. Pahl, “Adaptive E-learning content generation based on semantic web technology,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-learning, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005.
  20. M. Tosic and M. Cubric, “SeMCQ—Protégé plugin for automatic ontology-driven multiple choice question tests generation,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Protégé Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.
  21. H. Knublauch, R. Fergerson, N. Noy, and M. Musen, “The Protégé OWL plugin: an open development environment for semantic web applications,” in The Semantic Web—ISWC 2004, vol. 3298, pp. 229–243, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. B. Žitko, S. Stankov, M. Rosić, and A. Grubišić, “Dynamic test generation over ontology-based knowledge representation in authoring shell,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, pp. 8185–8196, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. I. Leshcheva, D. Gorovaya, and D. Leshchev, “Ontology-based assessment technique,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications in Higher Education (SemHE '10), Southampton, UK, 2010.
  24. C. D. Bailey, J. N. Karcher, and B. Clevenger, “A comparison of the quality of multiple-choice questions from CPA exams and textbook test banks,” The Accounting Educators' Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  25. P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano, P. Haase, and M. Sintek, “Towards linguistically grounded ontologies,” in Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pp. 111–125, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2009.
  26. L. R. Aiken, “Testing with multiple-choice items,” Journal of Research & Development in Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 44–58, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  27. L. C. Jacobs and C. I. Chase, Developing and Using Tests Effectively: A Guide For Faculty, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1992.
  28. K. Woodford and P. Bancroft, “Multiple choice questions not considered harmful,” in Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education(ACE '05), A. Young and D. Tolhurst, Eds., vol. 42, pp. 109–116, Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, Australia, 2005.
  29. G. Francopoulo, M. George, N. Calzolari et al., “Lexical Markup Framework (LMF),” in Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC '06), Genoa, Italy, 2006.
  30. N. E. Gronlund, Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching, Macmillan, 1985.