Review Article

Technology Efficacy in Active Prosthetic Knees for Transfemoral Amputees: A Quantitative Evaluation

Table 6

Detailed average calculations for different knee parameters versus various sensors.

Sensor (S)Knee angleKnee torqueKnee power

S1p(0.93 ) [31],
(0.9 ) [31],
(0.35 ) [34],
(0.9 ) [35],
(0.9 ) [42],
(0.35 ) [37]
(4 ) [31],
(0.5 ) [34],
(3.5 ) [35],
(1.5 ) [42]
(0.98 ) [34],
(1.13 ) [35],
(1.15 ) [41],
(1.13 ) [42],
( ) [36],
(0.9 ) [37]
(2 ) [31],
(4 ) [34],
(6 ) [35],
(2 ) [42],
(2 ) [37]
(2.5 ) [34],
(1.75 ) [35],
(8.75 ) [42],
(17.75 ) [36]
(1.4 ) [34],
(0.35 ) [35],
(1.8 ) [42],
(1.02 ) [36]
(0.12 ) [34],
(1.15 ) [35],
(1.95 ) [42],
(0.51 ) [36]
(1.1 ) [34],
(1.02 ) [35],
(2.1 ) [36]
(0.13 ) [34],
(0.23 ) [35],
(0.23 ) [36]
Average0.68 2.38 1.03 3.2 7.69 1.14 0.93 1.41 0.2

S2f(0.5 ) [5](0.5 ) [5](0.95 ) [5], 
( ) [30]
(0.95 ) [5](5 ) [5](0.75 ) [5](0.2 ) [5](0.44 ) [5](0.12 ) [5]
Average0.5 0.5 0.98 0.95 5 0.75 0.2 0.44 0.12

S2s(0.35 ) [37](0.9 ) [37](2 ) [37]NVNVNVNVNV
S3(0.35 ) [34],
(0.9 ) [35],
(0.9 ) [42]
(0.5 ) [34],
(3.5 ) [35], (1.5 ) [42]
(0.98 ) [34],
(1.13 ) [35],
(1.135 ) [42]
(6 ) [34],
(6 ) [35],
(2 ) [42]
(2.5 ) [34],
(1.75 ) [35],
(8.75 ) [42]
(1.4 ) [34],
(0.35 ) [35],
(1.8 ) [42]
(0.12 ) [34],
(1.15 ) [35],
(1.95 ) [42]
(1.1 ) [34],
(1.02 ) [35]
(0.135 ) [34],
(0.23 ) [35]
Average0.72 1.83 1.08 4.67 4.33 1.18 1.07 1.06 0.18

S4(0.5 ) [5],(0.5 ) [5],(0.95 ) [5],
( ) [36],
(1.15 ) [41]
(0.95 ) [5](5 ) [5],
(17.75 ) [36]
(0.75 ) [5],
(1.02 ) [36]
(0.1 ) [5],
(0.51 ) [36]
(0.44 ) [5],
(2.1 ) [36]
(0.12 ) [5],
(0.23 ) [36]
Average0.5 0.5 1.03 0.95 11.38 0.89 0.31 1.27 0.18

S1p: angle sensor, S2f: FSR (force sensitive resistive), S2s: strain gauge, S3: moment sensor or torque sensor, S4: position sensor, and NV: no value reported from study.