Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 352381, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/352381
Research Article

Pseudo-Weak- Algebras

1Department of Mathematics and Computer, Wuyi University, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, China
2Department of Computer Science and Technology, Chuxiong Normal University, Chuxiong, Yunnan 675000, China

Received 1 March 2014; Revised 7 April 2014; Accepted 10 April 2014; Published 4 May 2014

Academic Editor: Jianming Zhan

Copyright © 2014 Yong Lin Liu and Xiaobo Cai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Imai and K. Iseki, “On axiom system of propositional calculus,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, vol. 42, pp. 19–22, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Georgescu and A. Iorgulescu, “Pseudo-BCK algebras: an extension of BCK algebras,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Combinatorics, Computability and Logic (DMTCS '01), pp. 97–114, Springer, London, UK, 2001.
  3. Y. L. Liu, S. Y. Liu, and Y. Xu, “Pseudo-BCK algebras and PD-posets,” Soft Computing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. C. Chang, “Algebraic analysis of many valued logics,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 88, pp. 456–490, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Georgescu and A. Iorgulescu, “Pseudo MV algebras,” Multiple Valued Logic, vol. 6, pp. 95–135, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Hajek, Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998.
  7. G. Georgescu and A. Iorgulescu, “Pseudo-BL algebras: a noncommutative extension of BL algebras,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference FSTA, pp. 90–92, Slovakia, 2000.
  8. A. Di Nola, G. Georgescu, and A. Iorgulescu, “Pseudo-BL algebras: part I,” Multiple Valued Logic, vol. 8, pp. 673–714, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Di Nola, G. Georgescu, and A. Iorgulescu, “Pseudo-BL algebras: part II,” Multiple Valued Logic, vol. 8, pp. 717–750, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  10. X.-H. Zhang and X.-S. Fan, “Pseudo-BL algebras and pseudo-effect algebras,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Zhan, Y. B. Jun, and H. S. Kim, “Some types of falling fuzzy filters of BL-algebras and its applications,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1675–1685, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  12. F. Esteva and L. Godo, “Monoidal t-norm based logic: towards a logic for left-continuous t-norms,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 271–288, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Flondor, G. Georgescu, and A. Iorgulescu, “Pseudo-t-norms and pseudo-BL algebras,” Soft Computing, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 355–371, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  14. G. Wang, “A formal deductive system for fuzzy propositional calculus,” Chinese Science Bulletin, vol. 42, no. 18, pp. 1521–1525, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Zhan, D. W. Pei, and Y. B. Jun, “Falling fuzzy (implicative) filters of R0-algebras and its applications,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 611–618, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Iorgulescu, “Classes of pseudo-BCK algebras—part I,” Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 71–130, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. L. Liu and X. H. Zhang, “Pseudo NM-algebras and their properties,” Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 753–756, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  18. D. Pei, “On equivalent forms of fuzzy logic systems NM and IMTL,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 187–195, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus