Bridge Condition Assessment Using <svg style="vertical-align:-0.0pt;width:18.125px;" id="M1" height="14.7" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 18.125 14.7" width="18.125" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.022,-0,0,-.022,.062,14.638)"><path id="x1D437" d="M780 372q0 -191 -178 -297q-128 -75 -335 -75h-250l7 27q61 7 77 22t28 76l77 398q11 62 0 76.5t-77 22.5l6 28h292q164 0 258.5 -67.5t94.5 -210.5zM678 375q0 119 -73 180.5t-201 61.5q-62 0 -82 -13q-17 -7 -25 -53l-80 -427q-8 -47 -4 -62t26 -20q24 -6 80 -6
q166 0 262.5 95t96.5 244z" /></g></svg> Numbers

<table>Weights of factors in each level.</table>

The Scientific World Journal

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Bridge Condition Assessment Using <svg style="vertical-align:-0.0pt;width:18.125px;" id="M1" height="14.7" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 18.125 14.7" width="18.125" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.022,-0,0,-.022,.062,14.638)"><path id="x1D437" d="M780 372q0 -191 -178 -297q-128 -75 -335 -75h-250l7 27q61 7 77 22t28 76l77 398q11 62 0 76.5t-77 22.5l6 28h292q164 0 258.5 -67.5t94.5 -210.5zM678 375q0 119 -73 180.5t-201 61.5q-62 0 -82 -13q-17 -7 -25 -53l-80 -427q-8 -47 -4 -62t26 -20q24 -6 80 -6
q166 0 262.5 95t96.5 244z" /></g></svg> Numbers 

The Scientific World Journal

Bridge Condition Assessment Using Numbers

Figure 3