Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 365691, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/365691
Review Article

Shedding Light on the Controversy Surrounding the Temporal Decline in Human Sperm Counts: A Systematic Review

1Department of Urology, University of São Paulo (USP), Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, 7o. Andar, Sala 710F, 05403-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Referral Center for Male Reproduction, Avenue Dr. Heitor Penteado 1464, 13075-460 Campinas, SP, Brazil

Received 28 August 2013; Accepted 24 October 2013; Published 2 February 2014

Academic Editors: S. Cayan and R. L. Davis

Copyright © 2014 Marcello Cocuzza and Sandro C. Esteves. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [12 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Sandro C. Esteves, “Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination,” International Braz J Urol, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 443–453, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Soria Eladak, Tiphany Grisin, Delphine Moison, Marie-Justine Guerquin, Thierry N'Tumba-Byn, Stéphanie Pozzi-Gaudin, Alexandra Benachi, Gabriel Livera, Virginie Rouiller-Fabre, and René Habert, “A new chapter in the bisphenol A story: bisphenol S and bisphenol F are not safe alternatives to this compound,” Fertility and Sterility, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Edson Borges, Amanda Souza Setti, Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Rita de Cassia Savio Figueira, and Assumpto Iaconelli, “Decline in semen quality among infertile men in Brazil during the past 10 years,” International Braz J Urol, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 757–763, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marcello Cocuzza, “RE: Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination,” International Braz J Urol, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 181–183, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • E. F. Galimova, and Sh. N. Galimov, “Male fertility: modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors (a review),” Problemy reproduktsii, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 89, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Filipe Tenorio Lira Neto, Phil Vu Bach, Bobby B. Najari, Philip S. Li, and Marc Goldstein, “Spermatogenesis in Humans and its affecting factors,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Satya Srini Vasan, “Interpretation of Semen Analysis,” Male Infertility, pp. 55–83, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ashok Agarwal, Sandro C. Esteves, and Ahmad Majzoub, “Unraveling the utility and limitations of clinical practice guidelines,” Translational Andrology and Urology, vol. 6, pp. S506–S508, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • P Sengupta, E Borges, S Dutta, and E Krajewska-Kulak, “Decline in sperm count in European men during the past 50 years,” Human & Experimental Toxicology, pp. 096032711770369, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • B.F. Hales, and B. Robaire, “The Male Germ Cell as a Target for Toxicants ?,” Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mehdi Bouassida, Sahbi Kebaili, Nozha Chakroun Feki, Salima Daoud, Afifa Sellami, Leila Ammar Keskes, and Tarek Rebai, “Routine assessment of occupational exposure and its relation to semen quality in infertile men: A cross-sectional study,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 902–907, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Pallav Sengupta, Maiza Tusimin, Tulay Irez, Elzbieta Krajewska-Kulak, and Sulagna Dutta, “Sperm counts in Asian men: Reviewing the trend of past 50 years,” Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 87–92, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar