|
| Comparison of | Sign test | Details | value | Conclusion | Significance |
|
| Electromyogram elimination (all levels of artifacts) | Two-sided | DAFOP is better on 31 pages; CCA is better on 15 pages; same level on 67 pages. | | DAFOP has more often better electromyogriam elimination | Significant |
| Cerebral signal elimination (all cerebral signals of the study) | Two-sided | DAFOP is better on 30 signals, CCA is better on 7 signals; same level on 142 signals. | | DAFOP has more often better cerebral signal conservation | Highly significant |
| Alpha rhythm elimination | Two-sided | DAFOP is better on 12 signals, CCA is better on 1 signal; same level on 58 signals. | | DAFOP has more often better Alpha rhythm conservation | Highly significant |
| Spike elimination | Two-sided | DAFOP is better on 5 signals, CCA is better on 6 signals; same level on 38 signals. | | DAFOP and CCA spike conservation seem similar | Not significant |
| Spike-wave elimination | Two-sided | DAFOP is better on 10 signals, CCA is better on 0 signal; same level on 24 signals. | | DAFOP has more often better spike-wave conservation | Highly significant |
Epileptic rhythmic
discharge elimination | Two-sided | DAFOP is better on 3 signals, CCA is better on 0 signals; same level on 12 signals. | | DAFOP has better epileptic rhythmic discharge conservation | Not significant |
|
| Quality of filtering by pages, all criteria balanced | One sided | DAFOP is better on 58 pages; CCA is better on 33 pages; same quality on 23 pages. | | DAFOP is more often judged better than CCA when balancing all criteria | Highly Significant |
|
