Research Article  Open Access
SVMBased Spectrum Mobility Prediction Scheme in Mobile Cognitive Radio Networks
Abstract
Spectrum mobility as an essential issue has not been fully investigated in mobile cognitive radio networks (CRNs). In this paper, a novel support vector machine based spectrum mobility prediction (SVMSMP) scheme is presented considering timevarying and spacevarying characteristics simultaneously in mobile CRNs. The mobility of cognitive users (CUs) and the working activities of primary users (PUs) are analyzed in theory. And a joint feature vector extraction (JFVE) method is proposed based on the theoretical analysis. Then spectrum mobility prediction is executed through the classification of SVM with a fast convergence speed. Numerical results validate that SVMSMP gains better shorttime prediction accuracy rate and miss prediction rate performance than the two algorithms just depending on the location and speed information. Additionally, a rational parameter design can remedy the prediction performance degradation caused by high speed SUs with strong randomness movements.
1. Introduction
Cognitive radio (CR) as a solution for the next generation wireless networks brings new hope to address the wireless spectrum inefficiency problem which has attracted a great deal of attention in recent years [1–4]. In general, CR paradigms are classified in three types: interweave, underlay, and overlay. In interweave or opportunistic spectrum access (OSA) model [5, 6], CUs can use the licensed spectrums opportunistically when the spectrums are detected idle by spectrum sensing. It is very sensitive to PU traffic pattern and it relies on the detection error for the models [6, 7]. Thus, it is essential to investigate the spectrum mobility which is the foundation of resource allocation and network construction.
In a CRN, the spectrum mobility for CUs includes two aspects: spectrum mobility in the time domain and spectrum mobility in the space domain [8]. The timevarying and spacevarying characteristics of the spectrum mobility lead to the problem that it is hard to access the licensed spectrums for CUs in a real network. Timevarying characteristic is because of the random variations of PUs’ arrivals and departures. Thus, some related literatures have focused on the impact of PUs’ activity on CRNs [9–11]. In [12], a selective opportunistic spectrum access scheme is proposed with the aid of PUs’ traffic prediction techniques. The scheme can estimate the probability of a channel being idle and choose the best order of spectrum sensing to maximize spectrum efficiency. The definition of channel availability vector is introduced to characterize the state information of licensed channels [13]. And a predictionbased sensing approach is presented to maximize system throughput which reduces the sensing time. In [14], a forecast scheme of call arrival rate and call holding time for PUs is proposed. CUs can reduce the frequency hopping rate through the traffic pattern prediction of PUs.
In the space domain, the movement of CUs directly results in the changing of the spectrum availability. Nevertheless, the movement of CUs, as one of the most important factors in wireless communication systems, is not adequately discussed for CRNs in existing works. A mobility model describing airborne nodes is proposed in [15]. And a stabilitycapacityadaptive routing scheme is proposed to achieve high throughput and small transmission time based on the model. In [16], an optimal power control algorithm in mobile CR ad hoc networks is proposed. Without causing harmful interference to PUs, the network achieves maximized throughput based on the algorithm in the legacy network. In [17], a clusterbased routing protocol which can increase throughput and reduce data delivery latency is presented to mend the route in mobile CRNs. In [18], a general scheduling framework with the mobility information is conducted to solve maximum throughput channel scheduling problem for mobile CRNs. And two polynomial time optimal algorithms are proposed and evaluated by using the mobility trace obtained from a real public transportation system.
However, few of existing works investigate the following two issues: (1) considering time domain and space domain characteristics of spectrum mobility together and (2) considering the prediction of spectrum mobility. In practice, a CRN should be forward looking rather than reactive [19]. And a predictionbased CRN can not only improve system performance but also minimize interference to PUs [20–22], because spectrum detecting may take a long time or delay. In [23], a neural network based channel status predictor using multilayer perceptron is proposed. The system spectrum utilization is improved and the sensing energy is saved greatly by predicting the idle channels. In [24], a channel handoff scheme based on SVM is presented to reduce the handoff time. The channel handoff caused by the random movement of PUs and CUs is considered in the prediction design. In [25], a binary time series approach is used to predict the future occupancy of neighboring channels. This approach performs very well for deterministic occupancy even without updating data.
The key contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) we first take the two issues discussed above into account at the same time. And an effective joint feature vector extraction scheme is originally designed through the theoretical analysis on joint information of CUs’ mobility and PUs’ working activities. (2) Based on the extracted joint feature vector, a novel SVMbased spectrum mobility prediction scheme considering the timespace domain of spectrum mobility together is proposed for mobile CRNs in order to ameliorate the traditional prediction methods only utilizing the location and speed information directly. (3) Finally, simulations are conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed prediction mechanism. The new prediction mechanism achieves higher shorttime prediction performance than the conventional algorithms with little training nodes, which is vital in CRNs.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The system model is described in Section 2 and the spectrum availability of SUs is discussed in Section 3. In Section 4, a spectrum mobility prediction scheme is proposed based on SVM. The simulation results are shown along with a discussion in Section 5. At last, Section 6 concludes the paper.
2. System Model
2.1. Mobile CRN System Model
In this paper, we consider a mobile CRN scenario where CUs coexist with PUs illustrated in Figure 1. Assume that each has a licensed access to a spectrum with a coverage radius . Thus, the number of PUs is equal to the number of spectrums in the network. Each , with an interference radius , can exploit locally unused licensed spectrum opportunistically without causing any interference to the corresponding . Suppose that the CRN assigns spectrums periodically with an allocation interval time which is the interval time between two times of spectrum allocation. We also assume spectrum sensing is ideal in this paper.
Figure 1 gives out an instantaneous snapshot of a mobile CRN deployment with 20 mobile CUs. Two PUs are located in the area. The activity of each in Figure 1) is characterized as an on/off (busy/idle) model. The busy time and idle time of can be modeled by the exponential distribution with means and , respectively [26–28]. The probability density function (PDF) can be written, respectively, as
In this paper, a random mobility model which characterizes the movement of CUs in a twodimensional space is considered [29]. The movement of each consists of a sequence of random length intervals called mobility epochs during which moves at a constant speed in a constant direction. And the mobility epoch lengths are independently exponentially distributed with mean . The probability distribution function can be expressed as
During each epoch, the mobile direction of is uniformly distributed over and the speed of is uniformly distributed over . We assume mobility is uncorrelated among all the CUs in a network. And it is reasonable to assume that epoch length, speed, and direction are uncorrelated in the model. Figure 2 shows a mobility trajectory of one given as an example.
Definition 1. Given a licensed spectrum and an instantaneous time , the instantaneous spectrum availability for one can be defined as
means that licensed spectrum is instantaneously available at for and means that licensed spectrum is not instantaneous available at for , where represents the Euclidean distance between and at . represents the timevarying working activity of , denoted as
Definition 2. Given a licensed spectrum and a continuous period , the continuous spectrum availability for one can be defined as where is a given reference time. means that spectrum is available to not only at but also at any time between and . means that spectrum is not available to at some time between and . In practice, could be a slot or some slots, during which can achieve activation and access to the network. Apparently, we focus more on because a continuous time period (or a shorttime duration) rather than an instantaneous time is more meaningful for OSA or resource allocation in CRN.
Our objective is to give out the spectrum mobility prediction for all the CUs based on the joint theoretical analysis of CUs’ mobility and PUs’ working activities under the mobile model. Obviously, it is a complicated nonlinear problem which cannot be solved by normal algorithm. In this paper, a new prediction scheme is presented to solve this problem by SVM.
2.2. Support Vector Machine
As a highly competitive learning method, SVM is gaining popularity in many fields based on the statistical learning theory [30–32]. SVM adopts structural risk minimization principle which has been shown superior to empirical risk minimization principle used by traditional neural networks [24]. Moreover, the generalization ability of SVM is strong [33]. SVM is initially used to solve the classification problem. Assume there is training sample data denoted as where is an input vector containing multiple features. is a class indicator. is the dimension of sample data. Optimal hyper plane is constructed as where are weights and is offset argument. The samples on and are support vectors. The according equations are and , respectively. So, the classification margin is . For our nonlinear problem, the representation of the sample data has to be changed from the original input space to a higher dimensional space which is referred to as the feature space. This quadratic programming (QP) problem can be expressed as is relaxation factor and is cost parameter which is a given value. A Lagrange function is constructed to solve the above constrained optimization problem (8) as follows: where and are Lagrange multipliers. In order to get the solution of the original problem, we calculate the partial derivative for different variables as
Based on (10), the original optimization problem shown in (9) is transformed to a dual optimization problem as is a chosen kernel function which will be discussed later in the prediction scheme section. Thus, we can obtain the optimization where can be solved by (11). And which does not appear in the dual problem can be calculated through the original constraint. Consider
Therefore, the final prediction output expression can be written as
3. Joint Feature Vector Extraction
The common idea is utilizing SVM via domain information such as location and speed directly. However, it does not make good use of the CUs’ mobility characteristic and PUs’ working activities information. The traditional methods, thus, result in low prediction accuracy performance, which will be discussed in the simulation part.
In this section, as joint feature vector is extracted for SVM through theoretical deduction. Obviously, is related to a period . In this paper, we focus mainly on spectrum allocation interval time which is meaningful for a real CRN. Two situations need to be investigated in order to derive : (1) is in the coverage area of at and (2) is not in the coverage area of at , respectively.
For the first situation, let predict a period during which can use continuously. And our idea is to derive through computing . In fact, includes two main situations: (1) representing the situation that does not move into coverage scope between and and (2) representing the situation that moves into coverage scope at while the activity of is inactive between and . We believe and dominate the main situations although other complicated situations as small probability events also exist.
also contains two parts: (1) representing the situation that the velocity of does not change from to and (2) representing the other situations. Consider
From (2), can be easily obtained as
It is difficult to get the accurate value of because we cannot know the velocity change information (the change in time, speed, and direction) at any time for . However, the approximate value by estimating can be derived [34]. When , has to change its movement speed and direction (or any of them) before , which makes away from . Therefore, can be obtained as where denotes the probability that moves away from after the first velocity (speed and direction) change. In practice, represents other situations (small probability events except the situations discussed above). For example, changes its speed three times while still does not move into ’s coverage scope from to . is used to balance the equation and we will discuss it later.
When , for can be obtained as
For the second situation, the movement of and the working state of should be investigated simultaneously. Different from the first situation, we believe that the prediction of the idle state for is more essential due to the original position of . Similar to the first situation, let predict a continuous period that will not move out of ’s coverage boundary from to . It is noted that is different from the mentioned above.
When , for can be obtained as
Similar to above, is used to denote all the other small probability events. represents the idle probability of between and . represents the probability that moves out of coverage boundary before . consists of two parts. denotes the situation that the velocity of remains unchanged from to . And denotes the other situations. can be easily obtained as where tries to represent all the other situations. represents the probability that moves away from after the first change in velocity. According to (1), (19), and (20), for can be obtained as
When , is mainly determined by ’s working activity. Thus, for can be obtained as denotes all the other spectrum availability situations. Thus, we obtain joint feature vector sets according to different situations based on (17), (18), (21), and (22). Moreover, we can get the ultimate prediction expression according to (14)
4. Spectrum Mobility Prediction Scheme
In this section, a new SVMbased spectrum mobility prediction scheme is proposed based on the analysis and deduction above. The main steps of the proposed prediction scheme are as follows.
Step 1 (CRN initialization). Initialize the original locations of PUs and CUs randomly in the twodimensional deployment area. The coordinates of PUs are not changed once generated. And PUs’ initial working states are stochastic. Initialize the original speed, direction, and epoch lengths for each . Assume the maximum velocity for CUs is . The beginning time of the system is set to . The parameters , of SVM are initialized. Simulations are based on many times to make sure of the accuracy of the result. In addition, set , , , , , , , , , , and .
Step 2 (operate the mobile CRN model). PUs’ working states obey an exponential on/off model. The PDF satisfies (1). And the mobility of CUs follows the mobile model mentioned in Section 2.1. The mobility epoch lengths are independently exponentially distributed with mean . It is noted that wraparound technique is adopted during simulation in order to make the total number of SUs unchanged in the simulation area.
Step 3 (calculate the joint feature vectors for SVM). Here, there are three situations to be investigated. Firstly, does not move into the coverage of at granted that moves with towards . Secondly, is out of the coverage of at , but may move into the coverage of between and . Finally, is in the coverage of at . The detail calculation steps for are described in Algorithm 1.
Step 4 (execute prediction by SVM). Firstly, a SVM prediction model is generated according to the history input vectors from Step 3. Secondly, put the data to be predicted into the generated SVM model. Then, compute the prediction results and record the results. Here, we adopt the RBF kernel as mapping function for SVM in simulation. Because the RBF kernel function tends to obtain more robust results than other kernels and can reduce numerical difficulties, the RBF kernel function can be defined as
Step 5 (the system resets). Execute Steps 1 to 4 until simulation numbers are satisfied for testing. Then, the operation stops. Compute the prediction performance: the prediction accuracy rate and the miss detection probability . is defined as where are testing data which are to be predicted. And are true labels for testing data. is the total number of testing data. are the predicted decision values. Here, represents the busy/idle working activity for a given PU. represents the element numbers for a given set. Actually, reflects the accuracy degree of spectrum prediction mechanism. The higher the is, the better the prediction effect is.
In addition, the miss prediction rate (the rate that the spectrum is predicted to be idle while it is actually busy) is investigated for the proposed prediction mechanism. Because can reflect the actual interference to the PUs to some extent. The smaller the is, the better the prediction mechanism is. can be defined as
Note that .
5. Simulation Results and Analysis
In this section, experimental results of the prediction performances for our proposed scheme are investigated. Simulation parameters are shown in Table 1. We compare the proposed prediction mechanism with the traditional prediction schemes (SVM with initial location coordinates of CUs and SVM with initial location coordinates and speed of CUs) to evaluate the prediction performances under different parameters.

Note that we assume during simulation for simplicity, because they are very small positive values that are set to balance the according equations. In addition, the total testing number is set to 1000 in order to avoid randomness during simulation.
Figure 3 shows among different algorithms versus training node number. The proposed SVMSMP converges at about 40 training data faster than SVMlocation algorithm (SVMLA) with a convergent result at about 100 training data. of SVMlocationspeed algorithm (SVMLSA) is much worse than the other comparison algorithms which shows that the initial speed parameters have a bad effect on the prediction performance. It is caused by the timevarying characteristic of CUs’ velocity (speed or direction).
As shown in Figure 4, decreases with the increasing of for the three different algorithms. of the proposed SVMSMP is better than SVMLA when is relatively small . However, of SVMSMP is worse than SVMLA when is big enough (). It is because the proposed prediction scheme is based on the shorttime prediction idea according to the feature vector extraction analysis in (17), (18), (21), and (22). Moreover, wraparound technique makes CUs stay at their original positions with big probability at the simulation boundary. Thus, SVMLA decreases not that fast with the increasing of . And the SVMSMP works well when the prediction time is not long and vice versa. Note that the shorttime prediction performance is mainly focused on in this paper because CR itself should achieve communication in a very short time.
As illustrated in Figure 5, is studied versus for different algorithms. of SVMSMP is nearly equal to 0 when is small , which is better than SVMLA. However, of SVMSMP increases very fast when is big enough. Figure 5 shows the good shorttime miss prediction rate characteristics of the new algorithm which is very essential to CR.
In Figures 6 and 7, and versus are investigated between SVMSMP and SVMLA. From Figure 6, of SVMSMP is better than that of SVMLA when . However, of SVMSMP is worse than that of SVMLA when and . It shows that the proposed SVMSMP lose the advantages when the prediction time and speed are too big simultaneously. As shown in Figure 7, of SVMSMP is less than . Comparatively, of SVMLA is approximately . Thus, SVMSMP shows good performance with changing.
In Figures 8 and 9, we investigate and versus between SVMSMP and SVMLA. From Figure 8, of SVMSMP decreases obviously with the increasing of when is big (such as ). However, of SVMSMP does not change very obviously with the increasing of when is small (such as ). It is due to the fact that the bigger the is, the stronger the irregular movements of CUs are. Thus, it is difficult for the prediction when CUs are moving with high speed and strong irregular movements. As shown in Figure 9, of SVMSMP is much better than that of SVMLA when is small such as , . However, of SVMSMP is worse than that of SVMLA when and , which validates the performance degradation of the prediction performance again when is relatively big with strong irregular movements. It is because SVMSMP is based on the assumption of weak irregular movements for CUs.
In Figures 10 and 11, and versus are investigated for SVMSMP and SVMLA. In Figure 10, of SVMSMP is obviously better than of SVMLA when the prediction time is short such as 1 s and 3 s. However, of SVMSMP is worse than of SVMLA when the prediction duration time is and the mean idle time is . In Figure 11, of SVMSMP is nearly equal to 0, which is much better than SVMLA. In addition, the prediction performance and does not improve significantly for the two algorithms with the increasing of when is big enough according to Figures 10 and 11.
Figure 12 shows the impact of on the prediction accuracy rate for SVMSMP. When , the maximum of occurs at about which is relatively small. With the increasing of , the maximum value position of moves to the right. When , the maximum of occurs at about . It is because the small probability events happen more times when SUs’ randomness movements are strong ( is big). The bigger the is, the bigger the maximum value position of occurs for . Therefore, we can obtain better prediction performance by adjusting for randomness movements of different strength.
As shown in Figure 13, miss prediction rate is studied versus for SVMSMP. When and , the minimum of occurs at about and , respectively. It shows that different optimal corresponds to SUs’ randomness movements of different strength for . The simulation results further confirm the impact of on the prediction accuracy rate in Figure 12.
6. Conclusions
In this paper, a new spectrum mobility prediction algorithm is proposed in mobile CRNs. SVM theory is adopted to improve the spectrum mobility prediction performance, which takes into account time and spacevarying characteristics together. Moreover, new extracted feature vectors based on the theoretical analysis are input into SVM. Simulation results confirm that the convergence speed of our SVMSMP is faster than SVMLA and SVMLSA. Meanwhile, SVMSMP shows better shorttime prediction performance than SVMLA and SVMLSA, which is essential to real mobile CRNs. In addition, the prediction performance degradation caused by SUs’ high speed and strong randomness movements can be made up by choosing the proper parameters.
As known to us, how to choose the best parameters ( and ) quickly is still an open problem in SVM. We will further analyze the impact of on prediction performance. It leaves us to investigate in the future.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation and Civil Aviation Administration of China (Grant nos. 61101122 and 61071104), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (Grant no. 2012AA120802), and Postdoctoral ScienceResearch Development Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant no. LBHQ12080).
References
 F. Kader, Asaduzzaman, and M. Hoque, “Hybrid spectrum sharing with cooperative secondary user selection in cognitive radio networks,” KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 2081–2100, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Haykin, “Cognitive radio: brainempowered wireless communications,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 201–220, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Sun, Y. Ju, and Y. Yamao, “Overlay cognitive radio OFDM system for 4G cellular networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 68–73, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 C. X. Wang, F. Haider, and X. Gao, “Cellular architecture and key technologies for 5G wireless communication networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 122–130, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 Q. Zhao and A. Swami, “A decisiontheoretic framework for opportunistic spectrum access,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 14–20, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zou, Y. Yao, and B. Zheng, “A cooperative sensing based cognitive relay transmission scheme without a dedicated sensing relay channel in cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 854–858, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. B. Letaief and W. Zhang, “Cooperative communications for cognitive radio networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 878–893, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. F. Akyildiz, W. Lee, M. C. Vuran, and S. Mohanty, “A survey on spectrum management in cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 40–48, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Wang, Z. Ji, K. J. R. Liu, and T. C. Clancy, “Primaryprioritized Markov approach for dynamic spectrum allocation,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1854–1865, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Asghari and S. Aissa, “Adaptive rate and power transmission in spectrumsharing systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 3272–3280, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Jung and X. Liu, “Opportunistic spectrum access in multipleprimaryuser environments under the packet collision constraint,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 501–514, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Yuan, R. C. Grammenos, Y. Yang, and W. Wang, “Performance analysis of selective opportunistic spectrum access with traffic prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1949–1959, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Yin, D. Chen, Q. Zhang, and S. Li, “Predictionbased throughput optimization for dynamic spectrum access,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1284–1289, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Li and S. A. Zekavat, “Traffic pattern prediction and performance investigation for cognitive radio systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '08), pp. 894–899, March 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Huang, G. Wang, F. Hu, and S. Kumar, “Stabilitycapacityadaptive routing for highmobility multihop cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2714–2729, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Song and J. Xie, “Optimal power control for concurrent transmissions of locationaware mobile cognitive radio ad hoc networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '09), pp. 1–6, December 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. C. Talay and D. T. Altilar, “United nodes: clusterbased routing protocol for mobile cognitive radio networks,” IET Communications, vol. 5, no. 15, pp. 2097–2105, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Zhang, K. Zeng, and P. Mohapatra, “Opportunistic spectrum scheduling for mobile cognitive radio networks in white space,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '11), pp. 844–849, March 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. W. Thomas, L. A. DaSilva, and A. B. MacKenzie, “Cognitive networks,” in Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN '05), pp. 352–360, November 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Jiang, L. Lai, R. Fan, and H. V. Poor, “Optimal selection of channel sensing order in cognitive radio,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 297–307, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Li, F. R. Yu, and M. Huang, “A distributed consensusbased cooperative spectrumsensing scheme in cognitive radios,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 383–393, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Yücek and H. Arslan, “A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 116–130, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. K. Tumuluru, P. Wang, and D. Niyato, “A neural network based spectrum prediction scheme for cognitive radio,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '10), pp. 1–5, May 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Guo, H. Ji, Y. Li, and X. Li, “A novel spectrum handoff management scheme based on SVM in cognitive radio networks,” in Proceedings of the 6th International ICST Conference on Communications and Networking in China (CHINACOM '11), pp. 645–649, August 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Yarkan and H. Arslan, “Binary time series approach to spectrum prediction for cognitive radio,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '07), pp. 1563–1567, October 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Zhao, L. Tong, A. Swami, and Y. Chen, “Decentralized cognitive MAC for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hoc networks: a POMDP framework,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 589–600, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Lee and I. F. Akyildiz, “Optimal spectrum sensing framework for cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 3845–3857, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Ning and P. Nintanavongsa, “Time prediction based spectrum usage detection in centralized cognitive radio networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '12), pp. 300–305, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 A. B. McDonald and T. F. Znati, “Mobilitybased framework for adaptive clustering in wireless ad hoc networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1466–1487, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
 N. Cristianini and J. S. Taylor, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other KernelBased Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
 Y. Liang, M. L. Reyes, and J. D. Lee, “Realtime detection of driver cognitive distraction using support vector machines,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 340–350, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Wu, Q. Yu, and K. Yi, “Leastsquares support vector machinebased learning and decision making in cognitive radios,” IET Communications, vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 2855–2863, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Jiang, D. He, and J. Rao, “A predictionbased link availability estimation for routing metrics in MANETs,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1302–1311, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Yao Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.