Research Article

Analysis of Feeder Bus Network Design and Scheduling Problems

Table 3

Classification of the literature based on problem perspective.

ReferencesObjective Decision variableConstraintDemand patternUrban or suburbanApplication area and scope

Wirasinghe [35]Coordinate transit system (rail and bus)ZRHMany-to-oneUrban
Wirasinghe et al. [23]Coordinate transit system (rail and bus)Z, RS, RH Many-to-oneUrbanExample, morning
Wirasinghe [36]Coordinate operationsBRD, RSD, BFMany-to-oneUrbanCalgary, peak
Hurdle and Wirasinghe [37]Optimize rail station spacingRSMany-to-oneUrban Calgary, peak
Kuah and Perl [17]Optimal design for feeder busBS, BRL, BHMany-to-one
Kuah and Perl [6]Optimal design for feeder busBRL, BF BL, N, RFMany-to-one
Many-to-many
SuburbanExample benchmark, morning
Martins and Pato [1]Optimal design for feeder busBRL, BFBL, N, F, RFMany-to-oneSuburbanExample benchmark, morning
Chien and Schonfeld [15]Optimal design of integrated rail and busRL, BH, BS, RS, BRLMany-to-manyExample
Chien and Yang [16]Optimize feeder route location and headwayBRL, BHG, BU, RCMany-to-oneSuburbanExample
Shrivastav and Dhingra [7]Development of routing and coordinated schedulesT D, RLMany-to-oneSuburbanMumbai
Chien et al. [9]Total welfare (operator and user cost)BRL, BHG, BU, RCMany-to-oneSuburbanExample
Chowdhury and Chien [32]Coordinated design of an intermodal transit systemBH, RH, BT C, BH, RHMany-to-oneUrbanNumerical example
Kuan [18]Optimal design for feeder busBRL, BF RL, N, RFMany-to-oneSuburbanExample benchmark, morning
Kuan et al. [10]Optimal design for feeder busBRL, BFBL, N, RFMany-to-oneSuburbanExample benchmark, morning
Chien [40]Total welfare (operator and user cost)BH, N, BRLC, N, BUUrbanSandy Hook, park
Kuan et al. [11]Optimal design for feeder busBRL, BF BL, N, RFMany-to-oneSuburbanExample benchmark, morning
Shrivastava and O’mahony [41]Development of routing and coordinated schedulesBRL, BFN, D, LFMany-to-oneSuburbanDublin
Shrivastava and O’mahony [43]Development of routing and coordinated schedulesBRL, BFN, D, LFMany-to-oneSuburbanDublin
Shrivastava and O’mahony [29]Development of routing and coordinated schedulesBRL, BFN, D, LFMany-to-oneSuburbanDublin, morning
Shrivastava and O’mahony [44]Development of routing and coordinated schedulesBRL, BFN, D, LF Many-to-oneSuburbanDublin, morning
Mohaymany and Gholami [31]Optimize multimode feederBRL, BF, MBL, N, F, BH, RSMany-to-oneSuburbanExample benchmark, morning
Gholami and Mohaymany [47]Optimize multimode feederBRL, BF, MBL, N, F, BH, RSMany-to-oneUrbanNorth of Tehran
Sivakumaran et al. [26]Coordination of vehicle schedules in a transit systemBH, RH, BLMany-to-oneUrbanAn idealized network
Hu et al. [48]Model for layout region of feederTTDUrbanGuangzhou
Ciaffi et al. [49]Develop routing and scheduling simultaneouslyBRL, BFBLUrbanWinnipeg and Rome, morning
Cipriani et al. [50]Develop an operative tool in the bus systemBRL, BFC, BL, FMany-to-manyUrban City of Rome
Xiong et al. [19]Optimal routing problemBRL, BHD, BUMany-to-oneUrbanExample