| References | Objective | Decision variable | Constraint | Demand pattern | Urban or suburban | Application area and scope |
| Wirasinghe [35] | Coordinate transit system (rail and bus) | Z | RH | Many-to-one | Urban | |
Wirasinghe et al. [23] | Coordinate transit system (rail and bus) | Z, RS, RH | | Many-to-one | Urban | Example, morning | Wirasinghe [36] | Coordinate operations | BRD, RSD, BF | | Many-to-one | Urban | Calgary, peak |
Hurdle and Wirasinghe [37] | Optimize rail station spacing | RS | | Many-to-one | Urban | Calgary, peak |
Kuah and Perl [17] | Optimal design for feeder bus | BS, BRL, BH | | Many-to-one | | | Kuah and Perl [6] | Optimal design for feeder bus | BRL, BF | BL, N, RF | Many-to-one Many-to-many | Suburban | Example benchmark, morning | Martins and Pato [1] | Optimal design for feeder bus | BRL, BF | BL, N, F, RF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Example benchmark, morning |
Chien and Schonfeld [15] | Optimal design of integrated rail and bus | RL, BH, BS, RS, BRL | | Many-to-many | | Example |
Chien and Yang [16] | Optimize feeder route location and headway | BRL, BH | G, BU, RC | Many-to-one | Suburban | Example | Shrivastav and Dhingra [7] | Development of routing and coordinated schedules | T | D, RL | Many-to-one | Suburban | Mumbai | Chien et al. [9] | Total welfare (operator and user cost) | BRL, BH | G, BU, RC | Many-to-one | Suburban | Example |
Chowdhury and Chien [32] | Coordinated design of an intermodal transit system | BH, RH, BT | C, BH, RH | Many-to-one | Urban | Numerical example | Kuan [18] | Optimal design for feeder bus | BRL, BF | RL, N, RF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Example benchmark, morning | Kuan et al. [10] | Optimal design for feeder bus | BRL, BF | BL, N, RF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Example benchmark, morning |
Chien [40] | Total welfare (operator and user cost) | BH, N, BRL | C, N, BU | | Urban | Sandy Hook, park | Kuan et al. [11] | Optimal design for feeder bus | BRL, BF | BL, N, RF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Example benchmark, morning | Shrivastava and O’mahony [41] | Development of routing and coordinated schedules | BRL, BF | N, D, LF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Dublin | Shrivastava and O’mahony [43] | Development of routing and coordinated schedules | BRL, BF | N, D, LF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Dublin | Shrivastava and O’mahony [29] | Development of routing and coordinated schedules | BRL, BF | N, D, LF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Dublin, morning | Shrivastava and O’mahony [44] | Development of routing and coordinated schedules | BRL, BF | N, D, LF | Many-to-one | Suburban | Dublin, morning | Mohaymany and Gholami [31] | Optimize multimode feeder | BRL, BF, M | BL, N, F, BH, RS | Many-to-one | Suburban | Example benchmark, morning | Gholami and Mohaymany [47] | Optimize multimode feeder | BRL, BF, M | BL, N, F, BH, RS | Many-to-one | Urban | North of Tehran |
Sivakumaran et al. [26] | Coordination of vehicle schedules in a transit system | BH, RH, BL | | Many-to-one | Urban | An idealized network |
Hu et al. [48] | Model for layout region of feeder | T | TD | | Urban | Guangzhou |
Ciaffi et al. [49] | Develop routing and scheduling simultaneously | BRL, BF | BL | | Urban | Winnipeg and Rome, morning |
Cipriani et al. [50] | Develop an operative tool in the bus system | BRL, BF | C, BL, F | Many-to-many | Urban | City of Rome |
Xiong et al. [19] | Optimal routing problem | BRL, BH | D, BU | Many-to-one | Urban | Example |
|
|