Research Article
Toluene Removal from Sandy Soils via In Situ Technologies with an Emphasis on Factors Influencing Soil Vapor Extraction
Table 2
In situ remediation tests in literature.
| Soil texture | Air flow rate | Type of technology | Initial concentration (mg/g of soil) | Remediation time (day) | Efficiency (%) | Reference(s) |
| Sand | 40 cm3/cm2·h | AIBV | 4 mg/g | 11 | 99 | Malina et al. [17] | Sand | 40 cm3/cm2·h | SVE | 4 mg/g | 24 | 99 | Malina et al. [17] | Qurtz sand | 10 mL/min | BV | 0.812 mg/g | 23.3 | 30 | Sui et al. [29] | Natural soil | — |
BV | 2 mg/g | 5 | 91 |
Magalhães et al. [14] | 14 mg/g | 5 | 82 | Natural soil | 0.13 L/min |
AIBV | 2 mg/g | 5 | 99 |
Magalhães et al. [14] | 14 mg/g | 5 | 99 | Sand | — | BV | 2 mg/g | 4 | 81 | This study | Sand | 0.25 L/min | SVE | 2 mg/g | 4 | 97 | This study | Sand | 0.25 L/min | AIBV | 2 mg/g | 4 | >99.5 | This study |
|
|
—: Without air injection.
|