Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 437919, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/437919
Research Article

The Optimal Licensing Contract in a Differentiated Stackelberg Model

1School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, China
2School of Management, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
3Antai College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200052, China

Received 26 September 2013; Accepted 9 December 2013; Published 10 February 2014

Academic Editors: V. Desai and T. Tuma

Copyright © 2014 Xianpei Hong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Germerad, “The changing role of R&D,” Reach-Technology Management, vol. 44, pp. 15–20, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  2. F. Ferreira and O. R. Bode, “Licensing endogenous cost-reduction in a differentiated Stackelberg model,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 308–315, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Rostoker, “A survey of corporate licensing,” Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 24, pp. 59–92, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  4. I. Macho-Stadler, X. Martinez-Giralt, and J. D. Pérez-Castrillo, “The role of information in licensing contract design,” Research Policy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 43–57, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. I. Kamien and Y. Truman, “Fee versus royalties and the private value of a patent,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 471–491, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Kabiraj, “Patent licensing in a leadership structure,” Manchester School, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 188–205, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Sen, “On the coexistence of different licensing schemes,” International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 393–413, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Crama, B. de Reyck, and Z. Degraeve, “Milestone payments or royalties? Contract design for R&D licensing,” Operations Research, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1539–1552, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Rey and D. Salant, “Abuse of dominance and licensing of intellectual property,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 518–527, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. C. Chang, J. L. Hu, and C. H. Lin, “The optimal licensing strategy of an outside patentee in vertically-related markets,” International Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 102–112, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. X. H. Wang, “Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model,” Economics Letters, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. H. Wang, “Fee versus royalty licensing in a differential Cournot duopoly,” Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 253–266, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Matsumura and N. Matsushima, “On patent licensing in spatial competition with endogenous location choice,” Working Paper, University of Tokyo, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Kishimoto and S. Muto, “Fee versus royalty policy in licensing through bargaining: an application of the nash bargaining solution,” Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 293–304, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. C. A. Wang, W. J. Liang, and P. S. Chou, “Patent licensing under cost asymmetry among firms,” Economic Modelling, vol. 31, pp. 297–307, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. K. E. Rockett, “Choosing the competition and patent licensing,” The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 161–171, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. N. Kulatilaka and L. Lin, “Impact of licensing on investment and financing of technology development,” Management Science, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1824–1837, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Arya and B. Mittendorf, “Enhancing vertical efficiency through horizontal licensing,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 333–342, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Poddar and U. B. Sinha, “Patent licensing from a high-cost firm to a low-cost firm,” Economic Record, vol. 86, no. 274, pp. 384–395, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. I. Kamien and Y. Tauman, “Patent licensing: the inside story,” Manchester School, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. H. Liao and D. Sen, “Subsidy in licensing: optimality and welfare implications,” Manchester School, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 281–299, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Sen and Y. Tauman, “General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 163–186, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus