Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 474809, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/474809
Research Article

The Implications of Diagnosis of Small for Gestational Age Fetuses Using European and South Asian Growth Charts: An Outcome-Based Comparative Study

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, 34137 Trieste, Italy
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, 00800 Colombo, Sri Lanka

Received 30 August 2013; Accepted 1 December 2013; Published 27 January 2014

Academic Editors: I. Ben-Shlomo and H. A. Beydoun

Copyright © 2014 Gianpaolo Maso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. L. Boulet, G. R. Alexander, H. M. Salihu, R. S. Kirby, and W. A. Carlo, “Fetal growth risk curves: defining levels of fetal growth restriction by neonatal death risk,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 1571–1577, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Mayer and K. S. Joseph, “Fetal growth: a review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 41, pp. 136–145, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Cnattingius, B. Haglund, and M. S. Kramer, “Differences in late fetal death rates in association with determinants of small for gestational age fetuses: population based cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 316, no. 7143, pp. 1483–1487, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. D. McIntire, S. L. Bloom, B. M. Casey, and K. J. Leveno, “Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 16, pp. 1234–1238, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Ounsted, V. Moar, and W. A. Scott, “Perinatal morbidity and mortality in small-for-dates babies: the relative importance of some maternal factors,” Early Human Development, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 367–375, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. M. Gilbert and B. Danielsen, “Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1596–1601, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Mandruzzato, Y. J. Meir, R. Natale, and G. Maso, “Antepartal assessment of IUGR fetuses,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 222–229, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. M. Bernstein, J. D. Horbar, G. J. Badger, A. Ohlsson, and A. Golan, “Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 198–206, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. G. Lindqvist and J. Molin, “Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 258–264, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Chetcuti, S. H. Sinha, and M. I. Levene, “Birth size in Indian ethnic subgroups born in Britain,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 868–870, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. L. Clarson, M. J. Barker, T. Marshall, and B. A. Wharton, “Secular change in birthweight of Asian babies born in Birmingham,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 867–871, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. F. B. Grundy, J. Hood, and G. B. Newman, “Birth weight standards in a community of mixed racial origin,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 481–486, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. R. Alexander, J. H. Himes, R. B. Kaufman, J. Mor, and M. Kogan, “A United States national reference for fetal growth,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. A. Spencer, T. C. Chang, S. C. Robson, and S. Gallivan, “Fetal size and growth in Bangladeshi pregnancies,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 313–317, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. B. Meire and P. Farrant, “Ultrasound demonstration of an unusual fetal growth pattern in Indians,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 260–263, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. S. Kinare, M. C. Chinchwadkar, A. S. Natekar et al., “Patterns of fetal growth in a rural Indian cohort and comparison with a Western European population: data from the pune maternal nutrition study,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 215–223, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Saksiriwuttho, T. Ratanasiri, and R. Komwilaisak, “Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in Northeastern Thailand,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1963–1969, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. S. Chitty, D. G. Altman, A. Henderson, and S. Campbell, “Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. S. Chitty, D. G. Altman, A. Henderson, and S. Campbell, “Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 125–131, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. S. Chitty, D. G. Altman, A. Henderson, and S. Campbell, “Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 132–135, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. P. Hadlock, R. B. Harrist, R. S. Sharman, R. L. Deter, and S. K. Park, “Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 333–337, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus, Green-Top Guideline no. 31, RCOG, London, UK, 2013.
  23. J. Unterscheider, S. Daly, M. P. Geary et al., “Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 208, no. 4, pp. 290.e1–290.e6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. P. Chauhan, L. M. Gupta, N. W. Hendrix, and V. Berghella, “Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 200, no. 4, pp. 409.e1–409.e6, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Gardosi and A. Francis, “Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 28.e1–28.e8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Ioannou, K. Talbot, E. Ohuma et al., “Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 119, no. 12, pp. 1425–1439, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar