Research Article  Open Access
An Optimal Control Method for Maximizing the Efficiency of Direct Drive Ocean Wave Energy Extraction System
Abstract
The goal of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system is to convert ocean wave energy into electricity. The problem explored in this paper is the design and optimal control for the direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system. An optimal control method based on internal model proportion integration differentiation (IMPID) is proposed in this paper though most of ocean wave energy extraction systems are optimized by the structure, weight, and material. With this control method, the heavy speed of outer heavy buoy of the energy extraction system is in resonance with incident wave, and the system efficiency is largely improved. Validity of the proposed optimal control method is verified in both regular and irregular ocean waves, and it is shown that IMPID control method is optimal in that it maximizes the energy conversion efficiency. In addition, the antiinterference ability of IMPID control method has been assessed, and the results show that the IMPID control method has good robustness, high precision, and strong antiinterference ability.
1. Introduction
Ocean wave energy is higher in energy density than other forms of renewable resource such as wind, solar energy, and tides [1]. In the past thirty years, a diversity of ocean wave energy extraction systems have been investigated [2–6]. Generally, ocean wave energy extraction systems can be classified into singlebody floating buoy, twobody floating buoys, and multibody floating buoys by the number of floating buoys [7]. This paper focuses on twobody heavy buoys and PMTLG system with which ocean wave energy is converted into electricity directly.
In order to maximize the efficiency of the ocean wave energy extraction system, some optimal control methods are proposed. The method of complexconjugate control is proposed to optimize the dimensions of heavy buoy and to maximize energy extraction from regular waves (sinusoidal waves) [8, 9]. However, this optimal control method can not be applied in the irregular waves (ocean waves) because the dimensions of heavy buoys are noncausal. To accomplish the optimal operation in ocean waves, a reactive control method based on the winding current of generators has been proposed [10]. Ideally, it is possible to adjust the winding current of generators to achieve the resonance between heavy buoy and ocean incident waves. However, the overload of winding current due to ocean waves’ high speed, especially with hurricane or typhoon, has not been taken into consideration in the reactive control method. In addition, the efficiency of generators will be decreased by adjusting the winding current.
Simple control and high efficiency make IMPID an attractive candidate for the optimal control of the ocean wave energy extraction system. In comparison with the conventional PID (proportion integration differentiation) control method, the IMPID control method can be implemented by adjusting the filter coefficient , while the conventional PID control method needs to adjust the three parameters: proportion , integration , and differentiation . In addition, software and hardware circuit development make the adoption of IMPID control method possible.
Therefore, this paper proposes the IMPID control method to optimize the dynamic performance of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system. The IMPID control method involves the antiinterference ability assessment, while lots of pervious researches focus on the optimization of generator or heavy buoys. The paper is organized as follows. Section 1 introduces the subject and a review of optimal control methods for the ocean wave energy extraction system. In Section 2, hydrodynamic analysis for heavy buoys, including the electromagnetic force of PMTLG, is presented. Section 3 is for the proposed IMPID control method to maximize the conversion of ocean wave energy into electricity. Results are in Section 4 and Section 5 is the conclusion.
2. Hydrodynamic and Electromagnetic Analysis
Direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system converts ocean wave energy into electricity directly without any intermediate links, such as pneumatics, hydraulic, lineartorotary conversion, or others. Figure 1 depicts a general scheme of the direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system where the oscillating system is made up of two heavy buoys, a PMTLG, a damper plate, and some other devices.
(a)
(b)
2.1. Hydrodynamic Analysis of Heavy Buoy
As a mathematical description of the heavy buoys, they are assumed to oscillate only in the vertical direction. Assumptions are further made that the dimensions of heavy buoys are smaller than incident wavelength, and the fluid is incompressible. Then, the method of frequency domain analysis and linear theory are adopted to describe the reciprocating oscillation of heavy buoys. The motion equation of the heavy buoys can be described as [11] where is the heavy buoy’s weight and is the heavy buoy’s acceleration. is the vertical wave force, which is the result of incident ocean waves, and can be written as where is the density of ocean water, is the acceleration of gravity, is the water plane area of heavy buoy, is the angular frequency, is the volume of displaced ocean water of heavy buoy, is the added mass coefficient, and is the complex amplitude of incident ocean waves [12, 13].
Further, is the radiation force resulting from the reciprocating oscillation of heavy buoy, is the hydrostatic buoyancy force, and is the friction force. can be described as where is the heavy buoy’s added mass, is the heavy buoy’s radiation damping coefficient [12, 13], and is the friction resistance coefficient of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system.
Substituting (2) and (3) into (1), and according to the complex representation , and are the heavy speed (the speed in the vertical direction) and the displacement of heavy buoy, respectively. Therefore, the heavy speed and displacement of heavy buoy can be written as
For the certain angular frequency , (4) indicates that the heavy speed of outer heavy buoy can be in resonance with incident wave by modifying its weight, which means the imaginary part of (4) is zero.
It is assumed that the ocean waves propagate regularly in sinusoidal trace; the wave period is 6 seconds and the wave height is 1.5 meters. From the above hydrodynamic analysis of heavy buoy, the heavy speeds of outer and inner heavy buoys are shown in Figure 2. From Figure 2, it can be seen that the heavy speed of outer heavy buoy is in approximate resonance with incident wave (with the adoption of weight optimization of outer heavy buoy). It also verified that the heavy speed of inner heavy buoy depends on its depth in water , and the inner heavy buoy is considered to be stationary when . The relative heavy speed between outer and inner heavy buoys drives the PMTLG to generate electricity.
In practice, the method of weight optimization of outer heavy buoy can not be applied in direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system due to the various angular frequencies of ocean waves and the inconstant force of PMTLG (see Section 2.2).
2.2. Electromagnetic Analysis of PMTLG
PMTLG is one of the most important devices of ocean wave energy extraction system. In this paper, a threephase PMTLG is proposed and installed in the inner heavy buoy (see Figure 1(b)).
At noload condition, the only force derived from PMTLG is detent force [14, 15]. Detent force, which resulted from the magnetic attraction between PMTLG’s piston and permanent magnets (fixed on PMTLG’s stator), plays a significant role in the dynamic performance of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system. According to the Maxwell stress tensor method [16], the governing equation of detent force can be expressed as where is the integral area of permanent magnets in line with PMTLG’s piston, is the air permeability, is the flux density, and and are the normal direction unit vectors and tangential direction unit vectors on the integral area, respectively.
At load condition, a load force is added to PMTLG besides the detent force. Actually, the amplitude and frequency of load force depend on the winding current , which is one of the current components in the reference frame. The components of PMTLG can be written as follows [17, 18]: where is the winding resistance, is the winding inductance, is the PMTLG’s angular frequency, and is the flux linkage caused by stator’s permanent magnets. Besides, , , , , , and are the parameters based on reference frame. It is assumed that there is delta connection; then, the sum of threephase voltages is zero and the zero sequence voltage is null. Therefore, the ocean wave energy that PMTLG extracted may be expressed as [19]
According to and (8), the PMTLG’s load force can be obtained as where is the pole pitch of PMTLG. Considering the detent force and the load force , the heavy speed and displacement of heavy buoy are rewritten as where is the Fourier representation of detent force .
The detent force only depends on the relative displacement between PMTLG’s piston and permanent magnets, and load force only relies on the parameters , , and ; thus, the method of weight optimization of heavy buoy cannot be employed in direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system. Besides, the linear equations (10) and (11) are only proper for constant frequency. This is because the added mass and radiation damping coefficient are decided by the angular frequency [12, 13], and the ocean waves’ angular frequency is inconstant.
3. IMPID Controller
3.1. IMPID Control Model
IMPID is practical in optimizing the dynamic performance of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system, which has advantages of good robustness, high precision, and antiinterference ability. Figure 3 depicts the block diagram of IMPID, and the variables are described as follows: is the plant (outer heavy buoy) to control; is the mathematical model of ; is IMPID controller; is feedback controller; is process output; is reference input (the heavy speed of ocean surface waves); is an unknown disturbance affecting the system.
In Figure 3, the consequent control signal can be written as
Thus,
Since , the closed loop transfer function of IMPID controller is
From Figure 3, the function of feedback controller is obtained as follows:
3.2. IMPID Controller Design
Actually, the heavy speed of ocean waves can be described by a secondorder linear approximate model [20]. Therefore, the controlled plant (outer heavy buoy) may be written as where , , and are the parameters of controlled plant. From (14), it can be concluded that when and , then . Therefore, it is assumed that ; then, the dynamic performance of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system can be controlled by modifying IMPID controller .
Given the mathematical model of control plant , the design of IMPID controller can be described as follows.(1)Decompose the mathematical model of control plant into “invertible” and “noninvertible” components as follows: the “invertible” component is an allpass filter and , for all . Then, the “noninvertible” component can be obtained as (2)Describe the IMPID controller as where is a secondorder filter ( is the filter coefficient). Then, the IMPID controller and feedback controller function turn into where , , , and .
Parameters , , and are known by the controlled plant ; thus, the dynamic performance of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system can be optimized by designing and through changing the filter coefficient .
4. Results
For the general outer heavy buoy geometry described in Figure 1(a), a secondorder linear approximate plant model is written as . Figure 4 shows an overview of IMPID control model for the direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system (the filter coefficient ). In Figure 4, the heavy speed of ocean surface wave is generated by applying the sinusoidal wave or Fourier representation to function signal generator and importing it into IMPID controller . The design of IMPID controller is based on the controlled plant and filter coefficient , and the disturbance signal is generated by functional calculation.
The basic structure of PMTLG proposed in this paper is presented in Figure 5, and its main parameters are shown in Table 1. Figure 6 shows the load characteristics of PMTLG (the piston’s velocity is 1 m/s). From Figure 6, it can be seen that the output power of PMTLG is proportional to the current because the voltage changes a little while the load resistance varies. In the case of rate load, the PMTLG’s current is 6.12 A, the resistance is 70 Ω, the output power is 7.86 kW, and the copper loss is 561 W. The load characteristics of PMTLG decide the maximum wave height that PMTLG can be resisted (see Figure 8).

4.1. In Regular Ocean Waves
For the regular ocean waves, it is assumed that the wave period is 4 s and the wave height is 0.399 m. At load condition, the heavy speed of outer heavy buoy is shown in Figure 7 when the IMPID control method and the outer heavy buoy’s weight optimization method are applied. If the filter coefficient , the outer heavy buoy’s amplitude and phase are less than or lag behind the surface of incident wave, which is similar to the outer heavy buoy’s weight optimization method. When the filter coefficient , the outer heavy buoy’s amplitude and phase are in agreement with the surface of incident wave. Therefore, the smaller is, the more wave energy can be obtained, because the outer heavy buoy is in resonance with the incident ocean waves. In Figure 7, the small fluctuations of heavy speed by the outer heavy buoy’s weight optimization method are due to the PMTLG’s detent force and load force.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 8 shows the average ocean wave energy that can be absorbed by the outer heavy buoy with the wave height and the wave period considered. Compared with the method of weight optimization of outer heavy buoy, the IMPID control method has better performance in the ocean wave energy absorption.
4.2. In Irregular Ocean Waves
In most cases, the amplitude and frequency of ocean waves are irregular, and the added mass and damping coefficient of outer heavy buoy are not constant (caused by the irregular ocean waves’ frequencies). Therefore, the method of weight optimization of heavy buoy can not be applied in the direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system.
Fortunately, the method of IMPID optimal control can be applied in the direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system. Figure 9 depicts the optimization results of IMPID control method based on a heavy speed time series of ocean surface waves (in the Yellow Sea at Lianyungang, China). Results on the real ocean surface waves’ heavy speed data illustrate how an accurate control of the direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system can be realized by a simple IMPID optimal control method based on the filter coefficient .
(a)
(b)
(c)
4.3. AntiInterference Ability of the IMPID Control Method
Occasionally, the direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system will suffer from some interference such as breaking ocean waves and winds. Figure 10 shows the antiinterference ability of IMPID control method at load condition (the filter coefficient ). The results prove that the IMPID control method has good robustness, high precision, and strong antiinterference ability. In addition, Figure 10 indicates that the IMPID control method can resist different period (0~6 s) and amplitude (0~2.5 m/s) of interference.
(a)
(b)
(c)
5. Conclusions
In this paper, the antiinterference ability has been taken into account in the IMPID optimal control method for direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system. It has been shown that the IMPID optimal control method can be accomplished by adjusting the only filter coefficient , while the conventional PID control method needs to adjust the three parameters: proportion , integration , and differentiation .
The proposed IMPID optimal control method maximizes the energy conversion from the ocean waves to electricity and improves the dynamic performance of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system. In addition, the IMPID optimal control method has good robustness and high precision, so the stability of direct drive ocean wave energy extraction system increases.
Additionally, PMTLG optimization including detent force reduction has been achieved in other papers, which benefits the proposed IMPID optimal control method implementation.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interests regarding this paper.
Acknowledgment
This work was financially supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (YBJJ1416).
References
 J. Falnes, “A review of waveenergy extraction,” Marine Structures, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 185–201, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. F. D. O. Falcão, “Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 899–918, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Drew, A. R. Plummer, and M. N. Sahinkaya, “A review of wave energy converter technology,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers A, vol. 223, no. 8, pp. 887–902, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Zabihian and A. S. Fung, “Review of marine renewable energies: case study of Iran,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2461–2474, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Lei, M. Hu, J. Liu, C. Liu, and W. Zhong, “Design and analysis of a linear hybrid excitation fluxswitching generator for direct drive wave energy converters,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 963093, 11 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Oğuz, İ. Güney, and H. Çalık, “Power quality control and design of power converter for variablespeed wind energy conversion system with permanentmagnet synchronous generator,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 783010, 14 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Chen, H. Yu, M. Hu, G. Meng, and C. Wen, “A review of offshore wave energy extraction system,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 623020, 9 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Nebel, “Maximizing the efficiency of waveenergy plants using complexconjugate control,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 206, pp. 225–236, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. H. Salter, J. R. M. Taylor, and N. J. Caldwell, “Power conversion mechanisms for wave energy,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, vol. 216, pp. 1–27, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 A. de la Villa Jaén, A. GarcíaSantana, and D. El MontoyaAndrade, “Maximizing output power of linear generators for wave energy conversion,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 875–890, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Falnes, Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2002.
 R. W. Yeung, “Added mass and damping of a vertical cylinder in finitedepth waters,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 119–133, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Sabuncu and S. Calisal, “Hydrodynamic coefficients for vertical circular cylinders at finite depth,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–63, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Xu, J. Ji, G. Liu, Y. Du, and H. Liu, “Design and analysis of linear faulttolerant permanentmagnet vernier machines,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 483080, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ji, S. Yan, W. Zhao, G. Liu, and X. Zhu, “Minimization of cogging force in a novel linear permanentmagnet motor for artificial hearts,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 3901–3904, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. E. Ahmad, H. W. Lee, and M. Nakaoka, “Detent force reduction of a tubular linear generator using an axial stepped permanent magnet structure,” Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 290–297, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 I. Boldea and S. Nasar, Linear Electric Actuators and Generators, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1997.
 M. Marufuzzaman, M. B. I. Reaz, L. F. Rahman, and T. G. Chang, “Highspeed current dq PI controller for vector controlled PMSM drive,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 709635, 9 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Wu, X. Zhang, P. Ju, and M. J. H. Sterling, “Modeling and control of AWSbased wave energy conversion system integrated into power grid,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1196–1204, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Beirão, D. Valério, and J. S. Da Costa, “Linear model identification of the Archimedes Wave Swing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives (POWERENG '07), pp. 660–665, Setubal, Portugal, April 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Zhongxian Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.