|
| CCT |
| Function/process | Subprocess | Mode of failure | Effect of failure | Cause of failure | Current controls | Current status | Recommended corrective actions | Action by | Action taken | Revised status |
| OCC | SEV | DET | RPN1 | OCC | SEV | DET | RPN2 |
|
| Coding | Planning | Inadequate skills/knowledge about the process | Unable to access the application | Request has not been raised to get access | This should be added in implementation checklist | 4 | 10 | 1 | 40 | Assigning SPOC to get access | Project manager (PM) | Knowledge transition about process | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
|
| Coding | Planning | Inadequate time | Delivery not in time | Incorrect estimated hours | Estimation should be done by skilled resources | 4 | 10 | 5 | 200 | Project owner/lead has to review the estimation based on requirements given | Project manager (PM) | To follow estimation model with proper training & knowledge | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Requirement change | 8 | 10 | 10 | 800 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 50 |
| Inappropriate skilled resources for DEV | 4 | 10 | 5 | 200 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Testing & review objective is not clear | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Inappropriate skilled resources for testing & review | 4 | 3 | 5 | 60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Coding | Development | Not reusing the existing rules | File size is huge to move | Increase in the count of rules | Code review should be done to check the logic/rules handled | 4 | 5 | 1 | 20 | Proper training and development | Project manager (PM) | Review by skilled resources | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
|
| Coding | Testing | Invalid data | Defects raised | Improper data handled while testing | Proper unit test scripts should be provided | 8 | 10 | 1 | 80 | Proper training about the application | Project manager (PM) | Valid unit test script template is followed with valid values & validations | 4 | 10 | 1 | 40 |
| Testing objective is not clear | 4 | 10 | 5 | 200 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Inappropriate skilled resources for testing | 4 | 10 | 10 | 400 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 50 |
|
| Coding | Review | Inappropriate skilled resources for review | Defects raised | Reviewed unnecessary codes | Should give the details about the code to be reviewed | 4 | 3 | 1 | 12 | Sharing the code details with required rule set & rule set version | Project manager (PM) | To follow IQA, EQA, and FI process before implementation | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Inadequate time | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Improper details about code review | 8 | 10 | 1 | 80 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
|
