Research Article

Development and Application of New Quality Model for Software Projects

Table 5

SWFMEA validation report (RPN1 TO RPN2).

CCT

H0: not significant in RPN1 & RPN2
H1: significant in RPN1 & RPN2 = 13, SQRT() = 3.60551

Mode of failureRPN1()(RPN2()(

Inadequate skills/knowledge about the process40−121.53814771.610−5.7692333.28402
Inadequate time20038.461541479.2910−5.7692333.28402
Requirement change800638.4615407633.15034.230771171.746
Inappropriate skilled resources for DEV20038.461541479.2910−5.7692333.28402
Testing & review objective is not clear5−156.53824504.293−12.7692163.0533
Inappropriate skilled resources for testing & review60−101.53810310.061−14.7692218.1302
Not reusing the existing rules20−141.53820033.145−10.7692115.9763
Invalid data80−81.53856648.5214024.23077587.1302
Testing objective is not clear20038.461541479.2910−5.7692333.28402
Inappropriate skilled resources for testing400238.461556863.915034.230771171.746
Inappropriate skilled resources for review12−149.53822361.753−12.7692163.0533
Inadequate time3−158.53825134.443−12.7692163.0533
Improper details about code review80−81.53856648.52110−5.7692333.28402

Total2100599347.22053920.31
Mean ()161.538549945.615.76923326.6925
Standard deviation ()223.485118.07464
Variance ()49945.6326.6925
Standard error mean (/SQRT())61.984335.01306

H0: there is no significant difference between RPN1 and RPN2.
H1: there is a significant difference between RPN1 and RPN2.