Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 497393, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/497393
Research Article

Explicit Finite Difference Methods for the Delay Pseudoparabolic Equations

1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Art and Science, Sinop University, 57000 Sinop, Turkey
2Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Yüzüncü Yil University, 65080 Van, Turkey
3Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Yüzüncü Yil University, 65080 Van, Turkey

Received 21 August 2013; Accepted 2 December 2013; Published 4 February 2014

Academic Editors: C.-s. Liu and N. I. Mahmudov

Copyright © 2014 I. Amirali et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Finite difference technique is applied to numerical solution of the initial-boundary value problem for the semilinear delay Sobolev or pseudoparabolic equation. By the method of integral identities two-level difference scheme is constructed. For the time integration the implicit rule is being used. Based on the method of energy estimates the fully discrete scheme is shown to be absolutely stable and convergent of order two in space and of order one in time. The error estimates are obtained in the discrete norm. Some numerical results confirming the expected behavior of the method are shown.

1. Introduction

We consider the initial-boundary value problem for pseudoparabolic equation with delay in the domain ; , , : where represents the delay parameter (for simplicity we assume that is an integer; i.e., for some integer ), , , and and are given sufficiently smooth functions satisfying certain regularity conditions in and and , respectively, to be specified, and furthermore

Equations of this type arise in many areas of mechanics and physics. Such equations are encountered, for example, as a model for two-phase porous media flows when dynamic effects in the capillary pressure are included [13]. They are used also to study heat conduction [4], homogeneous fluid flow in fissured rocks [5], shear in second order fluids [68], and other physical models. For a discussion of existence and uniqueness results of pseudoparabolic equations see [1, 911]. Various numerical treatments of equations of this type without delay have been considered in [2, 1219] (see also the references cited in them).

In the present paper finite difference technique is applied to numerical solution of the initial-boundary value problem for the semilinear delay Sobolev or pseudoparabolic equation. By the method of integral identities with use of the piecewise linear basis functions in space and interpolating quadrature rules with weight and remainder term in integral form, two-level difference scheme is constructed (see also [1214]) for singular perturbation cases without delay. For the time integration we use the implicit rule. The finite difference discretization is shown to be absolutely stable and convergent of order two in space and of order one in time. Based on the method of energy estimates the error analysis for approximate solution is presented. The error estimates are obtained in the discrete norm. Some numerical results confirming the expected behavior of the method are shown.

2. Discretization and Mesh

Notation. Let a set of mesh nodes that discretises be given by with
Define the following finite differences for any mesh function given on by
Introduce the inner products for the mesh functions and defined on as follows:
For any mesh function , vanishing for and we introduce the norms and “negative” norm for any function
Given a function , defined on , we will also use the notation

2.1. Difference Scheme

The approach of generating difference scheme is through the integral identity with the usual piecewise linear basis functions for the space

Using the appropriate interpolating quadrature rules with weight and remainder term in integral form, consistent with [1214], we obtain the precise relation where

The remainder term has the form with Based on (12), we propose the following difference scheme for approximating (1): where is defined by (12).

3. The Error Estimates and Convergence

To estimate the convergence of this method, note that the error function is the solution of the discrete problem,

Before obtaining the estimate for the solution (18) we give the following Lemma.

Lemma 1. Let the mesh function , defined on , satisfy where given, is an integer. Then where

Proof. For and inequality (19) reduces to Applying now the difference analogue of the Gronwall's inequality we get
For , after replacing in (19) , we have which by virtue of difference analogue of the Gronwall's inequality leads to (20), immediately.

Theorem 2. Let the derivatives , ,   and   be continuous and bounded on , , and , , ,  and  . Then for the discrete problem (17) the following error estimate holds:

Proof. Consider identity After some manipulations, we get Multiplying this inequality by and summing it up from to , also, using here the inequality we obtain Denoting we have where Applying now Lemma 1 we obtain Further, in view of the fact that we obtain where and are given by (15). From (35), under the assumed smoothness, we have which together with (33) completes the proof of the theorem.

Remark 3. Under sufficiently smoothness of and for calculations of and appropriate numerical quadrature formulae can be applied; for example, , , and so forth.

4. Numerical Results

In this section, we present numerical results obtained by applying the numerical method (17) to the particular problems.

Example 1. Consider the following linear problems: where

The exact solution of this problem is . The computational results are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

tab1
Table 1: The numerical results on .
tab2
Table 2: The numerical results on .

Example 2. Now consider the following nonlinear problem: where

The exact solution of this problem is . The computational results are presented in Tables 3 and 4.

tab3
Table 3: The numerical results on .
tab4
Table 4: The numerical results on .

It can be observed that the obtained results are essentially in agreement with the theoretical analysis described above.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we proposed an efficient numerical method for solving initial-boundary value problem for the semilinear pseudoparabolic equation. The proposed finite difference method was constructed, and based on the method of energy estimates the fully discrete scheme was shown to be absolutely stable and convergent of order two in space and of order one in time. The error estimates were obtained in discrete norm. Numerical results were presented, which numerically validate this theoretical result.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Y. Fan and I. S. Pop, “A class of pseudo-parabolic equations: existence, uniqueness of weak solutions, and error estimates for the Euler-implicit discretization,” Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 2329–2339, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Fan and I. S. Pop, “Equivalent formulations and numerical schemes for a class of pseudo-parabolic equations,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 246, pp. 86–93, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. M. Hassanizadeh and W. G. Gray, “Thermodynamic basis of capillary pressure in porous media,” Water Resources Research, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 3389–3405, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. J. Chen and M. E. Gurtin, “On a theory of heat conduction involving two temperatures,” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 614–627, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. I. Barenblatt, I. P. Zheltov, and I. N. Kochina, “Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1286–1303, 1960. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. D. Coleman and W. Noll, “An approximation theorem for functionals, with applications in continuum mechanics,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 355–370, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. R. Huilgol, “A second order fluid of the differential type,” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 471–482, 1968. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. W. Ting, “Certain non-steady flows of second-order fluids,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 14, pp. 1–26, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. L. Davis, “A quasilinear parabolic and a related third order problem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 327–335, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. H. Lightbourne III and S. M. Rankin III, “A partial functional differential equation of Sobolev type,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 328–337, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Showalter and T. W. Ting, “Pseudo-parabolic partial differential equations,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 1–26, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  12. G. M. Amiraliyev and I. G. Amireliyeva, “Difference schemes for the singularly perturbed Sobolev equations,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Difference Equations, Special Functions and Applications, pp. 23–40, Munich, Germany, 2005.
  13. G. M. Amiraliyev, H. Duru, and I. G. Amiraliyeva, “A parameter-uniform numerical method for a Sobolev problem with initial layer,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 185–203, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. M. Amiraliyev and Y. D. Mamedov, “Difference schemes on the uniform mesh for a singularly perturbed pseudo-parabolic equations,” Turkish Journal of Mathematics, vol. 19, pp. 207–222, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  15. R. E. Ewing, “Numerical solution of Sobolev partial differential equataions,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 345–363, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. E. Ewing, “Time-stepping Galerkin methods for nonlinear Sobolev partial differential equataions,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 15, pp. 1125–1150, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  17. W. H. Ford and T. W. Ting, “Uniform error estimates for difference approximations to nonlinear pseudo-parabolic partial differential equations,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 155–169, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Gu, “Characteristic finite element methods for non-linear Sobolev equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 51–62, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. T. Sun and D. Yang, “The finite difference streamline diffusion methods for Sobolev equations with convection-dominated term,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 125, no. 2-3, pp. 325–345, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus