Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 501738, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/501738
Research Article

Cochlear Implant Programming: A Global Survey on the State of the Art

1The Eargroup, Herentalsebaan 75, 2100 Antwerp-Deurne, Belgium
2Laboratory of Biomedical Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp-Deurne, Belgium
3VU University Medical Center, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4Hôpital Sacré Cœur, Beirut B.P.116, Lebanon
5Yorkshire CI Service, Bradford BD9 5HU, UK
6University Hospital Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
7Emmeline Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
8University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
9University Medical Center Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
10CHU de Grenoble, 38701 Grenoble, France
11Medizinische Hochschule, 30625 Hannover, Germany
12University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T. Popa, 95060 Iasi, Romania
13Meders Hearing and Speech Center, Istanbul, Turkey
14University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, MO 66160, USA
15Dr Manoj’s ENT Superspeciality Institute & Research Centre, Calicut, Kerala 673005, India
16LUMC, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
17Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London WC1X 8EE, UK
18University Hospital, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
19Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
20PD Hinduja Hospital National and MRC, Mumbai 400016, India
21UMC St. Radboud, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
22Nottingham Auditory Implant Programme, Nottingham NG1 5DU, UK
23University Hospital, 27 Oslo, Norway
24Hôpital Rothschild, 75012 Paris, France
25Hôpital Beaujon, Paris, France
26Medical Audiology Services, Perth, WA 6005, Australia
27University Sapienza, 185 Rome, Italy
28South of England CI Centre, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
29Sunnybrook, Toronto, ON, Canada M4N 3M5
30World Hearing Center, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland
31NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA

Received 18 August 2013; Accepted 20 November 2013; Published 4 February 2014

Academic Editors: E. Truy and A. J. Yonkers

Copyright © 2014 Bart Vaerenberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [20 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Elke M J Devocht, A Miranda L Janssen, Josef Chalupper, Robert J Stokroos, and Erwin L J George, “The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.,” Trends in hearing, vol. 21, pp. 2331216517727900, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bart Vaerenberg, Geert De Ceulaer, Zoltán Szlávik, Patrizia Mancini, Andreas Buechner, and Paul J. Govaerts, “Setting and reaching targets with computer-assisted cochlear implant fitting,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bart Vaerenberg, Paul J. Govaerts, Thomas Stainsby, Peter Nopp, Alexandre Gault, and Dan Gnansia, “A uniform graphical representation of intensity coding in current-generation cochlear implant systems,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 533–543, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ralf Greisiger, Jon K. Shallop, Per Kristian Hol, Ole Jakob Elle, and Greg Eigner Jablonski, “Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups,” Cochlear Implants International, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Rolf-Dieter Battmer, Katherine Kelleher, Thomas Lenartz, Isabelle Mosnier, Joanne Muff, Terry Nunn, Bart Vaerenberg, Zebunissa Vanat, Stephanie Borel, Martina Brendel, Andreas Buchner, Huw Cooper, Claire Fielden, Dzemal Gazibegovic, Romy Goetze, and Paul Govaerts, “Assessment of ‘fitting to outcomes expert’ FOX™ with new cochlear implant users in a multi-centre study,” Cochlear Implants International, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 100–109, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Helen Cullington, Padraig Kitterick, Lisa DeBold, Mark Weal, Nicholas Clarke, Eva Newberry, and Lisa Aubert, “Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial,” BMJ Open, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. e011342, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ning Ma, Saffron Morris, and Padraig Thomas Kitterick, “Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness,” Ear And Hearing, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 248–259, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paul J. Govaerts, “Expert opinion: Time to ban formal CI selection criteria?,” Cochlear Implants International, vol. 17, pp. 74–77, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paola V. Incerti, Teresa Y. C. Ching, Sanna Hou, Patricia Van Buynder, Christopher Flynn, and Robert Cowan, “Programming characteristics of cochlear implants in children: effects of aetiology and age at implantation,” International Journal of Audiology, pp. 1–14, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Hoppe, Liebscher, and Hornung, “Cochlear implant fitting strategies,” Hno, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 546–551, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Meeuws, David Pascoal, Iñigo Bermejo, Miguel Artaso, Geert De Ceulaer, and Paul J. Govaerts, “Computer-assisted CI fitting: Is the learning capacity of the intelligent agent FOX beneficial for speech understanding?,” Cochlear Implants International, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Faten Mina, Virginie Attina, Yvan Duroc, Evelyne Veuillet, Eric Truy, and Hung Thai-Van, “Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising,” Plos One, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. e0174462, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sebastian Hoth, Philipp Spitzer, and Mark Praetorius, “A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds,” Cochlear Implants International, pp. 1–11, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mareike Finke, Martin Billinger, and Andreas Büchner, “Toward Automated Cochlear Implant Fitting Procedures Based on Event-Related Potentials,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. e118–e127, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jace Wolfe, Melanie Gilbert, Erin Schafer, Leonid M. Litvak, Charles Finley, Anthony J. Spahr, and Aniket Saoji, “Optimizations for the Electrically-Evoked Stapedial Reflex Threshold Measurement in Cochlear Implant Recipients,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 255–261, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jantien L. Vroegop, J. Gertjan Dingemanse, Marc P. Van Der Schroeff, André Goedegebure, and R. Mick Metselaar, “Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. e232–e240, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Emalka A. Gajadeera, Karyn L. Galvin, Richard C. Dowell, and Peter A. Busby, “The change in electrical stimulation levels during 24 months postimplantation for a large cohort of adults using the nucleus® cochlear implant,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 357–367, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Richard C. Dowell, Peter A. Busby, Emalka A. Gajadeera, and Karyn L. Galvin, “Investigation of electrical stimulation levels over 8 to 10 years postimplantation for a large cohort of adults using cochlear implants,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 736–745, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tobias Rader, Philipp Doms, Youssef Adel, Tobias Weissgerber, Sebastian Strieth, and Uwe Baumann, “A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users,” International Journal of Audiology, pp. 1–8, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Julie Kosaner, Philipp Spitzer, Svetlana Bayguzina, Muammer Gultekin, and Laurie Arum Behar, “Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users,” Cochlear Implants International, pp. 1–9, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar