The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials Table 1 The characteristics of included studies.
Study Year Country Study design Number of Patients Mean age (range) Gender (M/F)
Side of fracture (R/L) Fracture classification Follow-up (month) Conflicts of interests PCCP DHS PCCP DHS P PCCP DHS P PCCP DHS Yang et al. [26 ] 2011 USA RCT 33 33 76 (30–100) 77 (44–101) >0.05 11/22 8/25 >0.05 N/S N/S AO/OTA 31.A1-A2 36 No Peyser et al. [25 ] 2007 Israel RCT 50 53 78.9 (62–95) 82.4 (63–95) 0.04 16/34 18/35 >0.05 27/23 32/21 AO/OTA 31.A1-A2 12 No Kosygan et al. [27 ] 2002 England RCT 52 56 82.7 (53–93) 82.8 (57–97) >0.05 8/44 12/44 >0.05 N/S N/S Evans1A-D 6 No Brandt et al. [23 ] 2002 Belgium RCT 33 38 80.1 (63–96) 81.6 (61–97) >0.05 N/S N/S >0.05 16/17 12/26 Evans1A-D 3 N/S Janzing et al. [24 ] 2002 Belgium RCT 53 62 82 (65–96) 83 (64–98) >0.05 N/S N/S >0.05 N/S N/S AO/OTA 31.A1-A2 12 N/S
PCCP: percutaneous compression plate; DHS: dynamic hip screw; RCT: randomised controlled trial; M: males; F: females; N/S: not stated; R: right; L: left.
