Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 514942, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/514942
Research Article

Vascular Closure Devices after Endovascular Procedures in Swine: A Reliable Method?

1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
2Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihra 634-8522, Japan
3Institute of Animal Research, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
4Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Philipps-University, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany

Received 3 December 2013; Accepted 21 January 2014; Published 11 March 2014

Academic Editors: W. S. Aronow and B. F. Uretsky

Copyright © 2014 P. Isfort et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. K. Nasser, E. R. Mohler III, R. L. Wilensky, and D. R. Hathaway, “Peripheral vascular complications following coronary interventional procedures,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 609–614, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. A. Omoigui, R. M. Califf, K. Pieper et al., “Peripheral vascular complications in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I),” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 922–930, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Waksman, S. B. King III, J. S. Douglas et al., “Predictors of groin complications after balloon and new-device coronary intervention,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 75, no. 14, pp. 886–889, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Eggebrecht, M. Haude, U. Woertgen et al., “Systematic use of a collagen-based vascular closure device immediately after cardiac catheterization procedures in 1,317 consecutive patients,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 486–495, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Chevalier, B. Lancelin, R. Koning et al., “Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 285–291, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. K. Hoffer and R. D. Bloch, “Percutaneous arterial closure devices,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 865–885, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. G. Kussmaul III, M. Buchbinder, P. L. Whitlow et al., “Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1685–1692, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Le Sage, M. McGee, and J. D. Emed, “Knowledge of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) prevention among hospitalized patients,” Journal of Vascular Nursing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 109–117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Legrand, P. Doneux, C. Martinez, O. Gach, and M. Bellekens, “Femoral access management: comparison between two different vascular closure devices after percutaneous coronary intervention,” Acta Cardiologica, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 482–488, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Mlekusch, P. Dick, M. Haumer, S. Sabeti, E. Minar, and M. Schillinger, “Arterial puncture site management after percutaneous transluminal procedures using a hemostatic wound dressing (Clo-Sur P.A.D.) versus conventional manual compression: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. A. Sanborn, H. H. Gibbs, J. A. Brinker, W. D. Knopf, E. J. Kosinski, and G. S. Roubin, “A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1273–1279, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. V. Scheer, A. Perel, and U. J. Pfeiffer, “Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine,” Critical Care, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 198–204, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Schlierf, U. Horst, M. Ruhl, T. Schmitz-Rode, W. Mokwa, and U. Schnakenberg, “A fast telemetric pressure and temperature sensor system for medical applications,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 17, no. 7, article S06, pp. S98–S102, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Silber, A. Bjorvik, H. Muhling, and A. Rosch, “Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 421–427, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. R. Tavris, Y. Wang, S. Jacobs et al., “Bleeding and vascular complications at the femoral access site following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): an Evaluation of Hemostasis Strategies,” Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 328–334, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. F. Arnaud, K. Teranishi, T. Tomori, W. Carr, and R. McCarron, “Comparison of 10 hemostatic dressings in a groin puncture model in swine,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 632–639, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus