The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 528496 | 7 pages |

Electrochemical Properties of Chemically Processed as Coating Material in Lithium-Ion Batteries with Si Anode

Academic Editor: Dengsong Zhang
Received07 Apr 2014
Revised24 May 2014
Accepted03 Jun 2014
Published22 Jun 2014


A coating material for Si anode in lithium-ion battery was processed by using SiCl4 and ethylene glycol. The produced particles after heat treatment at 725°C for 1 h were porous and irregularly shaped with amorphous structure. Pitch carbon added to was found to strongly affect solid electrolyte interphase stabilization and cyclic stability. When mixed with an optimal amount of 30 wt% pitch carbon, the showed a high charge/discharge cyclic stability of about 97% for the 2nd to the 50th cycle. The initial specific capacity of the was measured to be 1401 mAh/g. On the basis of the evaluation of the coating material, the process utilized in this study is considered an efficient method to produce with high performance in an economical way.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, portable consumer electronic products tend to be lighter and miniaturized with more functions [13]. With these trends, lithium-ion batteries, which are used as power source for electronic products, are required to possess high energy densities [4]. In particular, increased demands for electric vehicles and energy harvesting systems require the development of high-capacity electrodes that can be used in lithium-ion batteries. The theoretical specific capacities of the conventional cathode of LiCoO2 and anode of carbon are 135 and 372 mAh/g, respectively. The capacity of the cathode has been improved to about 200 mAh/g by employing new material systems [57]. However, the extent of capacity improvement of cathode materials was limited to less than 20% only. Thus, current situations necessitate the development of anode materials with higher specific capacity than carbon or graphite for modern electronic applications. As a way to improve the capacity of anode materials, much attention has been drawn to silicon-based materials. However, silicon-based electrodes, with high theoretical energy capacity of about 4200 mAh/g, were found to have some issues, such as low coulombic efficiency and cyclic stability.

The low coulombic efficiency and cyclic stability arising from the application of Si materials to lithium-ion batteries are caused principally by the poor electronic contact between Si particles because of large volume change during intercalation/deintercalation of Li ions. To improve the low electric conductivity and large volume expansion during lithium-ion insertion/extraction in the silicon-based anode, a number of approaches, such as the application of micron-/nanosized particles and the employment of coating with conductive additives, have been proposed and carried out [812]. Ryu et al. [8] reported an initial charge capacity of 3260 mAh/g and a discharge capacity of 1170 mAh/g for the micron-sized Si anode, obtaining relatively low initial coulombic efficiency of about 35%. The discharge capacity was also significantly decreased to about 200 mAh/g by the 10th cycle. When an anode sample made of nanosized Si particles was utilized [9], the relatively high initial capacity of about 2200 mAh/g was drastically reduced to around 500 mAh/g by the 10th cycle. Similar trends were observed for the anodes with Si dispersed in carbon matrix [1012], in which the initial capacities of the anodes (about or less than 1000 mAh/g) were significantly reduced to less than 680 mAh/g by the 30th cycle.

Even though the performance has been progressively improved through various approaches, such as diffusion length adjustment, enhanced conductivity, and buffering of volume expansion, the costly and complicated processes required for the synthesis of materials could hinder the practicality of these methods. Ng et al. [13] reported the following promising results with carbon-coated Si nanoparticles: a specific capacity of 1489 mAh/g and high coulombic efficiency of above 99.5% even after 20 cycles. However, the process for the material preparation required high temperature and sophisticated procedures. This coating process may also be effective only for nanosized Si particles because of the limited mechanical strength of coated carbon films.

In this study, an economical way of processing coating material with relatively high mechanical strength and cyclic performance was proposed; the coating material was synthesized from SiCl4 and ethylene glycol (EG), which are inexpensive and commercially available. The synthesized coating material consists of nanosized Si particles uniformly dispersed in the SiO2 matrix. The current process was performed in the liquid state of the raw materials in the air, followed by heat treatment at a relatively low temperature, enabling the process to be scaled up economically for high volume production of coating materials. As a feasibility study evaluating the potential of the synthesized coating material, its electrochemical performance was systematically investigated. The synthesized particles, mixed with an optimized amount of pitch carbon and conductive carbon blacks for cyclic stability and conductivity improvements, showed promising results. The particles showed a charge/discharge reversibility of 97% with a charging capacity of 536 mAh/g at the 50th cycle.

2. Experimental Procedure

An agglomerated, sponge-like, white gel powder was synthesized when EG (99.9%, Samchun Co.) was mixed with SiCl4 (99%, Wako Co.) solution in 1 : 1 volume ratio. The powder was heat-treated at 725°C for 1 h under a reduced atmosphere of N2 including 5 vol% H2 at 25 sccm flowing. The powder, which turned black after heat treatment, was hand-crushed by using a pestle and mortar. They were then mixed for 8 h under magnetic stirring at 80°C in the N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (99.5% NMP, Sigma-Aldrich Co.) solution with various amounts of 10, 20, 30, 35, and 40 wt% pitch carbons as an additional carbon source. Most of the NMP solution was evaporated during the stirring. A little amount of NMP remained in the powder but was removed by placing the powder in a vacuum oven at 80°C for 24 h. For appropriate electrical conductivity of the powder as an electrode, the powder was heat-treated at 900°C for 1 h in Ar atmosphere. The heat-treated powder was characterized before and after pitch carbon coating by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S-4700, Hitachi Co.), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analyzer (Nanoporosity-HQ, Mirae SI Co.), X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/MAX 2500, Rigaku Co.), and Raman spectroscopy (Invia Raman microscope, Renishaw Co.). Electrochemical characterizations for the pitch-coated electrode with the composite powder were measured with R2032 coin-type cells, in which a metal lithium foil was used as the counterelectrode. All the electrodes in the cells were prepared by mixing 80 wt% composite powder added with various amounts of pitch carbons, 10 wt% conductive carbon blacks of Super-P (SP, TIMCAL, Super P Li) : Ketjen black (KB, Mitsubishi Chemical Co., EC-600JD) with 1 : 1 in weight ratio, 10 wt% PVDF binder, and NMP solvent to form a uniform slurry with 160 μm thickness on the current collector of a copper foil by using doctor blade. Pitch carbon was mixed as a complementary way for cyclic stability improvement of the battery cell, even if the synthesized (pitch carbon 0 wt% added) is expected to show relatively high stability. Conductive carbon blacks were added to facilitate the insertion/extraction of lithium ions during charge/discharge processes. A solution of 1 M LiPF6 dissolved in a mixture of ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate (3 : 7 in wt ratio, Panaxetec) was used as the electrolyte. The electrodes were dried in a vacuum oven at 80°C for 24 h before being transferred into an Ar-filled glove box for cell assembly. The coin cells were charged and discharged between 0.01 and 2.5 V by applying a constant current of 50 mA/g for electrochemical characterization. By using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (VMP3, Bio-Logic Co.), we carried out impedance analyses with Nyquist plot in the frequency ranges of 1 mHz to 1 MHz for the samples tested for various cycles.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1(a) shows the morphology and size of the particles observed via SEM. The materials underwent heat treatment synthesized by the chemical reaction of SiCl4 with EG mixed at 1 : 1 volume ratio. The chemically synthesized material with a sponge-like shape was transformed into particles by heat treatment at 725°C for 1 h under reduced atmosphere. The particles were observed to be severely agglomerated in an irregular and porous shape, and their sizes were in the less than 100 μm range. The specific surface area of the powder was measured to be about 45 m2/g by BET, suggesting high particle porosity. The microstructural characteristics of the particles were investigated by XRD patterns and Raman spectra. The broad peaks observed from the XRD data in Figure 1(b) indicated a low degree of crystallinity or amorphous structure in the powder because no obvious crystalline peaks of Si, SiO2, or carbon were observed in the XRD pattern [2, 1416]. The Raman spectrum in Figure 1(c) for the sample showed two prominent peaks of D-band at 1350 cm−1 and G-band at 1590 cm−1, representing disorder-induced and graphitic features of carbon materials, respectively [17, 18]. From the G/D ratio of 1.17, the carbon in the sample was found to have a relatively high degree of crystallinity that was not consistent with the XRD pattern. TEM micrograph taken as in Figure 1(d) confirmed a slightly crystallized microstructure of carbon (dotted circle), which was consistent with the Raman data described above. The carbon detected in the particle is considered to have originated from the starting material of EG. The content of carbon was measured by TGA analysis. The mass change of the sample was monitored as a function of temperature of up to 800°C under the air atmosphere. Assuming the sample was primarily composed of SiO2 and C, the carbon was measured to be approximately 14.4 wt% of the sample. Thus, the as-prepared particles consist of composites of carbon with high degree of crystallinity and particles with amorphous or low degree of crystalline structures [4].

The distribution and composition of the elements in the anode electrode were examined by using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), as shown in Figures 2(a)2(d). The constituents were shown to consist of (detected as Si and O) with carbon homogeneously distributed. The conductive carbon blacks (20 nm to 30 nm) were distributed throughout or around the synthesized SiO particles. The XRD, Raman, and EDS data given in Figures 1 and 2 show that the synthesized particles consist of amorphous particles as the main phase. The pitch carbon and nanosized carbon blacks homogeneously distributed on the particles are expected to render cyclic stability and conductivity to the anode material, respectively.

The effect of pitch carbon on the performance was monitored by varying its amount mixed with the as-prepared powder. Given that the anode made with and pitch carbon showed a low charging capacity because of the high resistivity of (Figure 6), some conductive carbon blacks were added to the anode. Figure 3(a) shows the initial specific capacity changes for the samples with different amounts of pitch carbon (0 wt% to 40 wt%) and a fixed amount of conductive carbon black (10 wt%) obtained through the charge/discharge test. The charging capacity of the sample without pitch carbon was measured to be 1130 mAh/g. The charging capacity was gradually increased to 1401 mAh/g when the pitch carbon increased to 30 wt%. If the amount of pitch carbon is higher than 30%, then the capacity will deteriorate. The capacity reduces when the pitch carbon is more than 30 wt% because of the ratio effect of pitch carbon with inferior capacity relative to . A similar trend of capacity variation with different amounts of pitch carbon can be observed in Figure 3(b). This trend is a magnification of Figure 3(a) for the 0 V to 1.0 V range. These data indicate the importance of optimized amounts of pitch carbon relative to to favorably contribute to the capacity improvement by facilitating lithium-ion movements in the cell. The initial charge/discharge reversibility was also found to be affected by the amount of pitch carbon. This amount greatly improved to 59.1% when mixed with 30 wt% pitch carbon compared with 40.5% without pitch carbon. These data also show the positive effect of pitch carbon on the reversibility improvement when an optimized amount was added to the anode.

In Figure 4(a), the performance of the additive materials was examined to understand individual component characteristics in terms of capacity and cyclic stability. Pitch carbon had a specific charging and discharging capacity of 426 and 210 mAh/g, respectively. The conductive carbon blacks of SP and KB (mixed with 1 : 1 wt%), which are used as conventional additives for studies on the conductive improvement of lithium-ion batteries [19], have charge/discharge capacities of 2050 and 391 mAh/g, respectively. The mixing ratio was predetermined based on our preliminary work. The conductive carbon blacks showed high capacity but poor reversibility. The mixed with pitch carbon showed poor performance, confirming the necessity of conductive additives in the electrode. The cyclic stabilities and charge/discharge capacities of the additives were monitored for the 2nd until the 50th cycle. The conductive carbon blacks showed a relatively poor cyclic performance in 35 cycles. Pitch carbon showed a high cyclic stability of approximately 91% at 230 mAh/g charge/discharge capacities, as exhibited in Figure 4(b). However, the mixed with 30 wt% pitch carbon showed extremely low levels of charge/discharge capacity in the overall cyclic test. Thus, inferred from the above data, the performance of the electrode could be enhanced by taking advantage of pitch carbon and conductive carbon blacks for cyclic stability and conductivity (or capacity) improvements.

Figure 5 shows the specific capacity changes of the samples used in Figure 3 through the charge/discharge cyclic test of up to 50 cycles. Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show the variation of the charging and discharging capacities of the samples with the cycling test, respectively. The initial reversibility of the samples ranged from 40% to 60%, as shown in Figure 5(a). However, the reversibility significantly improved to above 97% after 30 cycles. Similarly observed in Figure 4, mixed with the conductive carbon blacks only showed poor capacity, confirming the necessity of pitch carbon in . The capacity improved when the amount of pitch carbon increased to 30 wt%. However, a higher amount of pitch carbon will lead to deteriorated capacity. These results are consistent with the data provided in Figure 3. However, the capacity of the electrode with more than 30 wt% pitch carbon was gradually decreased with the cycling number. On the basis of these results, 30 wt% is the threshold amount of pitch carbon needed to acquire a electrode with high capacity and cyclic stability. To understand the cyclic stability variation with the amount of pitch carbon in the electrode, the impedance variation through the charge/discharge cycling test was investigated by using the Nyquist plots of the samples.

Figure 6(a) shows the impedance data of the samples before cycling test. In an uncharged state, the samples had resistance of 239, 212, 190, and 92 ohms with varying amounts of pitch carbon at 0, 10, 30, and 40 wt%, respectively. The initial part was magnified for a close examination and is shown in the inset. The resistance of the electrode before cycling test decreased with the amount of pitch carbon. Figure 6(b) shows that after 50 cycles of charge/discharge test, the resistance of the samples, except for the sample with 30 wt% pitch carbon, increased. The corresponding resistance of the samples at 0, 10, 30, and 40 wt% of pitch carbon was measured to be 306, 217, 64, and 106 ohms from the diameter of each respective semicircle. The reduced resistance in the sample with 30 wt% pitch carbon indicates that a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) was formed and stabilized during the cycling test by electrolyte decomposition [15, 20, 21], which facilitated the charge transfer during charge/discharge processes [22]. These data are consistent with the stabilized capacities and significantly improved reversibility of the samples with cycling number, as observed in Figure 5. The newly formed semicircles at high frequencies for samples with more than 30 wt% pitch carbon also confirmed the formation and contribution of SEI to the reduced resistance of the charge flow [22].

4. Conclusions

particles were synthesized as coating materials for the Si anode of lithium-ion batteries through a solution-based process by using SiCl4 and EG. These particles were observed to be porous and irregularly shaped with the sizes of less than 100 μm. The EDS, XRD, and Raman spectra results show that the composition and microstructure of the synthesized particles consist of (detected as Si and O) with amorphous structure. powder was mixed with pitch carbon and conductive carbon blacks to improve cyclic stability and conductivity. The initial specific capacity was measured to be about 1401 mAh/g. The amount of pitch carbon was found to strongly affect the cyclic stability. A charge/discharge reversibility of about 97% was measured for the 2nd to the 50th cycle when an optimized amount of pitch carbon was used. Based on the impedance measurements by Nyquist plots, we determined that high reversibility and cyclic stability are caused by the stabilized SEI during cycling tests. Therefore, this study suggests that is a promising coating material with high performance and could be easily scaled up for high volume production through an economical and efficient way of solution-based process. The electrochemical characterization of Si anode material, coated with high performance , will be carried out and reported in future studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by the Energy Efficiency & Resources Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (no. 20112020100110/KIER B4-2462).


  1. M. Zhou, L. Zhao, T. Doi, S. Okada, and J.-I. Yamaki, “Thermal stability of FeF3 cathode for Li-ion batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 195, no. 15, pp. 4952–4956, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Zhou, M. L. Gordin, S. Chen et al., “Enhanced performance of SiO/Fe2O3 composite as an anode for rechargeable Li-ion batteries,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 28, pp. 79–82, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Momma, S. Aoki, H. Nara, T. Yokoshima, and T. Osaka, “Electrodeposited novel highly durable SiOC composite anode for Li battery above several thousands of cycles,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 969–972, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y.-S. Hu, R. Demir-Cakan, M.-M. Titirici et al., “Superior storage performance of a Si@SiOx/C nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteries,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1645–1649, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Suresh, A. K. Shukla, and N. Munichandraiah, “Electrochemical properties of LiMn1-xMxO2 (M = Ni, Al, Mg) as cathode materials in lithium-ion cells,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 152, no. 12, pp. A2273–A2280, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Z. Lu, D. D. MacNeil, and J. R. Dahn, “Layered Li[NixCo1-2xMnx]O2 cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. A200–A203, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. R. Mancini, L. Petrucci, F. Ronci, P. P. Prosini, and S. Passerini, “Long cycle life Li-Mn-O defective spinel electrodes,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. H. Ryu, J. W. Kim, Y.-E. Sung, and S. M. Oh, “Failure modes of silicon powder negative electrode in lithium secondary batteries,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. A306–A309, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. P. Guo, J. Z. Wang, H. K. Liu, and S. X. Dou, “Study of silicon/polypyrrole composite as anode materials for Li-ion batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 146, no. 1-2, pp. 448–451, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z. S. Wen, J. Yang, B. F. Wang, K. Wang, and Y. Liu, “High capacity silicon/carbon composite anode materials for lithium ion batteries,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 165–168, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Yang, B. F. Wang, K. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Y. Xie, and Z. S. Wen, “Si/C composites for high capacity lithium storage materials,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. A154–A156, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J.-H. Kim, H. Kim, and H.-J. Sohn, “Addition of Cu for carbon coated Si-based composites as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 557–561, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. H. Ng, J. Wang, D. Wexler, K. Konstantinov, Z. P. Guo, and H. K. Liu, “Highly reversible lithium storage in spheroidal carbon-coated silicon nanocomposites as anodes for lithium-ion batteries,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 118, no. 41, pp. 7050–7053, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H. Guo, R. Mao, X. Yang, and J. Chen, “Hollow nanotubular SiOx templated by cellulose fibers for lithium ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 74, pp. 271–274, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Wang, H. Zhao, J. He, C. Wang, and J. Wang, “Nano-sized SiOx/C composite anode for lithium ion batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, no. 10, pp. 4811–4815, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H.-C. Tao, M. Huang, L.-Z. Fan, and X. Qu, “Interweaved Si@SiOx/C nanoporous spheres as anode materials for Li-ion batteries,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 220, pp. 1–6, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. W. Iqbal, A. K. Singh, M. Z. Iqbal, and J. Eom, “Raman fingerprint of doping due to metal adsorbates on graphene,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 24, no. 33, Article ID 335301, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Roy, M. Chhowalla, H. Wang et al., “Characterisation of carbon nano-onions using Raman spectroscopy,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 373, no. 1-2, pp. 52–56, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. R. Kim, K. S. Yun, H. J. Jung et al., “Effect of anatase phase on electrochemical properties of the TiO2(B) negative electrode for lithium-ion battery application,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 13, pp. S148–S151, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. Yin, M. Wada, K. Yamamoto, Y. Kitano, S. Tanase, and T. Sakai, “Micrometer-scale amorphous Si thin-film electrodes fabricated by electron-beam deposition for Li-ion batteries,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. A472–A477, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. U. Kasavajjula, C. Wang, and A. J. Appleby, “Nano- and bulk-silicon-based insertion anodes for lithium-ion secondary cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 1003–1039, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Guo, A. Sun, X. Chen, C. Wang, and A. Manivannan, “Cyclability study of silicon-carbon composite anodes for lithium-ion batteries using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 3981–3987, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Hee-June Jeong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

913 Views | 842 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up