Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 536462, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/536462
Research Article

Exploration of a Capability-Focused Aerospace System of Systems Architecture Alternative with Bilayer Design Space, Based on RST-SOM Algorithmic Methods

College of Information System and Management, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, China

Received 10 December 2013; Accepted 13 February 2014; Published 24 March 2014

Academic Editors: P.-C. Chen, J. Y. Fu, and C. Mohan

Copyright © 2014 Zhifei Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction, “Joint capabilities integration and development system,” Defense Acquisition University CJCSI 3170.01G, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. L. Eriksson, E. Johansson, N. Kettaneh-Wold, C. Wikström, and S. Wold, Design of Experiments: Principles and Applications, Umetrics Academy, Umeå, Sweden, 2000.
  3. F. Pukelsheim, Optimal Design of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  4. N. Metropolis and S. Ulam, “The Monte Carlo method,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 44, no. 247, pp. 335–341, 1949. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Stein, “Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling,” Technometrics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 143–151, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. C. Bose and K. A. Bush, “Orthogonal Arrays of Strength two and three,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 508–524, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. K. T. Fang and C. Ma, Orthogonal and Uniform Design Experimentation, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2001.
  8. K. T. Fang, “The uniform design: application of number-theoretic methods in experimental design,” Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 363–372, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  9. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  10. S. Chen, C. F. N. Cowan, and P. M. Grant, “Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 302–309, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. D. Cliff and J. K. Ord, “Model building and the analysis of spatial patterns in human geography—with discussion,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 297–348, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. Afentakis and B. Gavish, “Optimal lot-sizing algorithms for complex product structures,” Operations Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 237–249, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Saitou, K. Izui, S. Nishiwaki, and P. Papalambros, “A survey of structural optimization in mechanical product development,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 214–226, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Danilovic and T. R. Browning, “Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 300–314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Pongcharoen, C. Hicks, and P. M. Braiden, “The development of genetic algorithms for the finite capacity scheduling of complex products, with multiple levels of product structure,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 215–225, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Griendling, ARCHITECT: the architecture-based technology evaluation and capability tradeoff methodology [Ph.D. thesis], Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2011.