Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 576409, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/576409
Research Article

Uncertainty Analysis of Knowledge Reductions in Rough Sets

1Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, 4800 Caoan Road, Shanghai 201804, China
2Department of Computer and Control Engineering, Yantai University, 32 Qingquan Road, Shandong 264005, China

Received 20 June 2014; Revised 3 August 2014; Accepted 3 August 2014; Published 27 August 2014

Academic Editor: Yunqiang Yin

Copyright © 2014 Ying Wang and Nan Zhang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Q. Miao, D. Y. Li, Y. Y. Yao et al., Uncertainty and Granular Computing, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2011, (Chinese).
  2. Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets,” International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 341–356, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Q. Miao, Y. Zhao, Y. Y. Yao, H. X. Li, and F. F. Xu, “Relative reducts in consistent and inconsistent decision tables of the Pawlak rough set model,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 24, pp. 4140–4150, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  4. D. Q. Miao, The research of rough set theory and application in machine learning [Doctorate], Institute of Automation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 1997.
  5. D. Slezak, “Normalized decision functions and measures for inconsistent decision tables analysis,” Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 291–319, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. M. Kryszkiewicz, “Comparative study of alternative types of knowledge reduction in inconsistent systems,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 16, pp. 105–120, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  7. Q. H. Hu, Z. X. Xie, and D. R. Yu, “Hybrid attribute reduction based on a novel fuzzy-rough model and information granulation,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3509–3521, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Q. H. Hu, D. R. Yu, and Z. X. Xie, “Information-preserving hybrid data reduction based on fuzzy-rough techniques,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 414–423, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. X. Hu and N. Cercone, “Learning in relational databases: a rough set approach,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 323–338, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Ye and Z. Chen, “A new type of attribute reduction for inconsistent decision tables and its computation,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 209–222, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. W. F. Du and K. Y. Qin, “Analysis of standard and relation of several attribute reducts in inconsistent decision table,” Chinese Journal of Electronic, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1336–1340, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. W. Zhang, J. Mi, and W. Wu, “Knowledge reductions in inconsistent information systems,” Chinese Journal of Computers, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Z. Xu, B. Yang, and W. Song, “Comparative study of different attribute reduction based on decision table,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 15, no. 4A, pp. 953–956, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Zhou, D. Miao, W. Pedrycz, and H. Zhang, “Analysis of alternative objective functions for attribute reduction in complete decision tables,” Soft Computing, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1601–1616, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. G. Y. Wang, J. Zhao, J. An, and Y. Wu, “A comparative study of algebra viewpoint and information viewpoint in attribute reduction,” Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 289–301, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Y. Yao, “Decision-theoretic rough set models,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology, vol. 4481 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, p. 112, 2007.
  17. A. Skowron, “Boolean reasoning for decision rules generation,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 295–305, 1993.
  18. Z. Pawlak, Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA, 1991.
  19. T. Beaubouef, F. E. Petry, and G. Arora, “Information-theoretic measures of uncertainty for rough sets and rough relational databases,” Information Sciences, vol. 109, no. 1–4, pp. 185–195, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. I. Düntsch and G. Gediga, “Uncertainty measures of rough set prediction,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 109–137, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. J. Liang and Z. Shi, “The information entropy, rough entropy and knowledge granulation in rough set theory,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus