Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 581724, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/581724
Research Article

Investigation on Mercury Reemission from Limestone-Gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Slurry

School of Environmental Science & Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China

Received 31 August 2013; Accepted 15 January 2014; Published 4 March 2014

Academic Editors: J. Canario, G.-C. Fang, and F. Scala

Copyright © 2014 Chuanmin Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. K. Srivastava, N. Hutson, B. Martin, F. Princiotta, and J. Staudt, “Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1385–1393, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. H. Pavlish, E. A. Sondreal, M. D. Mann et al., “Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 82, no. 2-3, pp. 89–165, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Ochoa-Gonzalez, P. Córdoba, M. Diaz-Somoano et al., “Differential partitioning and speciation of Hg in wet FGD facilities of two Spanish PCC power plants,” Chemosphere, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 565–570, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Ochoa-Gonzalez, M. Diaz-Somoano, M. R. Martinez-Tarazona et al., “The capture of oxidized mercury from simulated desulphurization aqueous solutions,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 120, pp. 55–60, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Wang, W. Wang, W. Xu, X. Wang, and S. Zhao, “Mercury removals by existing pollutants control devices of four coal-fired power plants in China,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1839–1844, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Wu, J. Mo, and B. Cheng, “Experimental study on the absorption behaviors of gas phase bivalent mercury in Ca-based wet flue gas desulfurization slurry system,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 183, no. 1–3, pp. 902–907, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Stergaršek, M. Horvat, J. Kotnik et al., “The role of flue gas desulphurisation in mercury speciation and distribution in a lignite burning power plant,” Fuel, vol. 87, no. 17-18, pp. 3504–3512, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Tang, J. Xu, R. Lu, J. Wo, and X. Xu, “Enhanced Hg2+ removal and Hg0 re-emission control from wet fuel gas desulfurization liquors with additives,” Fuel, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 3613–3617, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Omine, C. E. Romero, H. Kikkawa, S. Wu, and S. Eswaran, “Study of elemental mercury re-emission in a simulated wet scrubber,” Fuel, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 93–101, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Wo, M. Zhang, X. Cheng, X. Zhong, J. Xu, and X. Xu, “Hg2+ reduction and re-emission from simulated wet flue gas desulfurization liquors,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 172, no. 2-3, pp. 1106–1110, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. C. Chang and S. B. Ghorishi, “Simulation and evaluation of elemental mercury concentration increase in flue gas across a wet scrubber,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 37, no. 24, pp. 5763–5766, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Wu, S. Zhou, and H. Wang, “A mechanism study of chloride and sulfate effects on Hg2+ reduction in sulfite solution,” Fuel, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 2501–2507, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. van Loon, E. Mader, and S. L. Scott, “Reduction of the aqueous mercuric ion by sulfite: UV spectrum of HgSO3 and its intramolecular redox reaction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 1621–1626, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Ochoa-gonzalez, M. Diaz-somoano, M. R. Martinez-tarazona et al., “Control of Hg0 re-emission from gypsum slurries by means of additives in typical wet scrubber conditions,” Fuel, vol. 105, pp. 112–118, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. C. L. Wu, Y. Cao, C. C. He, Z.-B. Dong, and W.-P. Pan, “Study of elemental mercury re-emission through a lab-scale simulated scrubber,” Fuel, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 2072–2080, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. W. Deberry, G. M. Blythe, S. Pletcher et al., Bench-Scale Kinetics Study of Mercury Reactions in FGD Liquors, Air and Waste Management Association, Baltimore, Md, USA, 2006.