Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 583157, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/583157
Research Article

A Three-Stage Birandom Program for Unit Commitment with Wind Power Uncertainty

1School of Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2State Grid Shenyang Electric Power Supply Company, Shenyang 110021, China

Received 11 April 2014; Accepted 29 April 2014; Published 29 May 2014

Academic Editor: Guojie Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Na Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Soder, “Reserve margin planning in a wind-hydro-thermal power system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 564–570, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Doherty and M. O'Malley, “A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 587–595, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. A. Ortega-Vazquez and D. S. Kirschen, “Estimating the spinning reserve requirements in systems with significant wind power generation penetration,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 114–124, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Carpentier, G. Cohen, J. C. Culioli, and A. Renaud, “Stochastic optimization of unit commitment: a new decomposition framework,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 11, pp. 1067–1073, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Siahkali and M. Vakilian, “Stochastic unit commitment of wind farms integrated in power system,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 1006–1017, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Tuohy, P. Meibom, E. Denny, and M. O'Malley, “Benefits of stochastic scheduling for power systems with significant installed wind power,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS '08), pp. 18–24, Rincon, Puerto rico, May 2008. View at Scopus
  7. A. Tuohy, P. Meibom, E. Denny, and M. O'Malley, “Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 592–601, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. A. Ruiz, C. R. Philbrick, and P. W. Sauer, “Wind power day-ahead uncertainty management through stochastic unit commitment policies,” in IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition (PSCE '09), IEEE Computer Society, Seattle, Wash, USA, March 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. U. A. Ozturk, M. Mazumdar, and B. A. Norman, “A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1589–1598, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. S. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, Z. Li, and W. Tian, “Chance-constrained day-ahead scheduling in stochastic power system operation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Q. Wang, J. Wang, and Y. Guan, “Price-based unit commitment with wind power utilization constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2718–2726, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. Q. Wang, Y. Guan, and J. Wang, “A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 206–215, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Jiang, J. Wang, and Y. Guan, “Robust unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 800–810, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Zhao, J. Wang, J.-P. Watson, and Y. Guan, “Multi-stage robust unit commitment considering wind and demand response uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, pp. 2708–2717, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. B. Venkatesh, P. Yu, H. B. Gooi, and D. Choling, “Fuzzy MILP unit commitment incorporating wind generators,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1738–1746, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Tuohy, E. Denny, and M. O'Malley, “Rolling unit commitment for systems with significant installed wind capacity,” in IEEE Lausanne POWERTECH, pp. 1380–1385, Inst. of Elec. and Elec. Eng. Computer Society, Lausanne, Switzerland, July 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Pereira-Bonvallet, C. Suazo-Martinez, and R. Palma-Behnke, “A stochastic unit commitment policy for wind power uncertainty integrating corrective actions,” in IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–5, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, July 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Peng and B. Liu, “Birandom variables and birandom programming,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 433–453, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Xu and C. Ding, “A class of chance constrained multiobjective linear programming with birandom coefficients and its application to vendors selection,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 709–720, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Xu and X. Zhou, “A class of multi-objective expected value decision-making model with birandom coefficients and its application to flow shop scheduling problem,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 17, pp. 2997–3017, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Z. M. Tao and J. P. Xu, “An equilibrium chance-constrained multiobjective programming model with birandom parameters and its application to inventory problem,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 382620, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. P. Xu and Z. M. Tao, “A class of multi-objective equilibrium chance maximization model with twofold random phenomenon and its application to hydropower station operation,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 85, pp. 11–33, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  23. W. Ongsakul and N. Petcharaks, “Unit commitment by enhanced adaptive Lagrangian relaxation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 620–628, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. L. Snyder Jr., H. D. Powell Jr., and J. C. Rayburn, “Dynamic programming approach to unit commitment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 339–350, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Carrión and J. M. Arroyo, “A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1371–1378, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. F. G. Baptistella and J. C. Geromel, “A decomposition approach to problem of unit commitment schedule for hydrothermal systems,” IEE Proceedings D: Control Theory and Applications, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 250–258, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. G. Damousis, A. G. Bakirtzis, and P. S. Dokopoulos, “A solution to the unit-commitment problem using integer-coded genetic algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1165–1172, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. Senjyu, A. Y. Saber, T. Miyagi, K. Shimabukuro, N. Urasaki, and T. Funabashi, “Fast technique for unit commitment by genetic algorithm based on unit clustering,” IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 152, pp. 705–713, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. P. A. Ruiz, C. R. Philbrick, and P. W. Sauer, “Modeling approaches for computational cost reduction in stochastic unit commitment formulations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 588–589, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. X. Peng and P. A. Jirutitijaroen, “A stochastic optimization formulation of unit commitment with reliability constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2200–2208, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. H. Heitsch and W. Römisch, “Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 187–206, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Dupačová, N. Gröwe-Kuska, and W. Römisch, “Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: an approach using probability metrics,” Mathematical Programming, Series B, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 493–511, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. Amjady and A. Shirzadi, “Unit commitment using a new integer coded genetic algorithm,” European Transactions on Electrical Power, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1161–1176, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Xiong, X. Liu, and T. Hashiyama, “Stochastic unit commitment problem considering risk constraints and its improved GA-based solution method,” IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 463–469, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. A. Kazarlis, A. G. Bakirtzis, and V. Petridis, “A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 11, pp. 83–92, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar