Research Article

Screening of Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) Accessions for High Salt Tolerance

Table 8

Effect of salinity on number of flowers of 13 salt treated purslane accessions.

Accession numberNumber of flowers
Salinity level (dS m−1)
010203040

Ac123.54 ± 0.69g15.42 ± 5.01f
(34.49)
6.12 ± 0.80g
(74.01)
2.16 ± 0.34h
(90.82)
0f
(100)
Ac235.22 ± 0.69c28.52 ± 0.40c
(19.02)
16.78 ± 0.42e
(52.36)
12.11 ± 0.35d
(65.62)
0.14 ± 0.19f
(99.6)
Ac322.66 ± 0.31g7.21 ± 0.16h
(68.18)
4.28 ± 0.22h
(81.11)
6.77 ± 0.23f
(70.12)
1.27 ± 0.23e
(94.39)
Ac432.17 ± 0.17e26.02 ± 0.26d
(19.12)
17.49 ± 0.27e
(45.63)
6.69 ± 0.31e
(79.2)
0f
(100)
Ac527.19 ± 0.21f25.71 ± 0.35d
(5.44)
20.17 ± 0.21c
(25.82)
15.26 ± 0.16b
(43.88)
10.03 ± 0.27a
(63.11)
Ac633.46 ± 0.19d28.46 ± 0.34c
(14.94)
23.42 ± 0.25b
(30.01)
14.44 ± 0.32c
(56.84)
6.0 ± 0.25f
(82.07)
Ac733.26 ± 0.21d31.47 ± 0.15b
(5.38)
26.28 ± 0.17a
(20.98)
22.20 ± 0.16a
(33.25)
8.30 ± 0.26b
(75.05)
Ac84.32 ± 0.22k2.82 ± 0.20j
(34.72)
1.16 ± 0.22i
(73.15)
0.77 ± 0.21i
(82.18)
0.12 ± 0.12c
(97.22)
Ac97.67 ± 0.36j4.01 ± 0.20i
(47.72)
1.28 ± 0.12i
(83.31)
0.08 ± 0.13i
(98.86)
0f
(100)
Ac1014.42 ± 0.14h11.02 ± 0.21g
(23.58)
6.70 ± 0.28g
(53.54)
2.13 ± 0.16h
(85.23)
0f
(100)
Ac1112.23 ± 0.23i10.47 ± 0.29g
(14.39)
6.58 ± 0.21g
(46.19)
0.17 ± 0.15i
(98.61)
0f
(100)
Ac1252.36 ± 0.28a22.42 ± 0.32e
(57.18)
18.57 ± 0.44d
(64.53)
8.31 ± 0.31e
(84.13)
2.36 ± 0.22d
(95.49)
Ac1346.50 ± 0.22b34.21 ± 0.19a
(26.43)
14.50 ± 0.22f
(68.82)
5.12 ± 0.41g
(99.98)
0f
(100)

Mean26.54 ± 14.41a19.06 ± 10.98b
(28.19)
12.56 ± 8.58c
(52.66)
7.40 ± 6.86d
(72.11)
2.17 ± 3.55e
(91.82)

Mean values with ±SE followed by different letters differ significantly according to Tukey’s multiple range tests at . Values in the parentheses indicate percent compared to the untreated control (0 dS m−1) plants.