Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 629791, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/629791
Research Article

Modeling Coral Reef Fish Home Range Movements in Dry Tortugas, Florida

1Division of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA
2Sustainable Fisheries Division, Southeast Regional Office, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA

Received 30 August 2013; Accepted 1 October 2013; Published 16 January 2014

Academic Editors: H. A. Lessios and X. Pochon

Copyright © 2014 Nicholas A. Farmer and Jerald S. Ault. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. T. Seton, Life Histories of Northern Animals, vol. 1, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1909.
  2. W. H. Burt, “Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 24, pp. 246–352, 1943. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Harris, W. J. Cresswell, P. G. Forde, W. J. Trewhella, T. Woollard, and S. Wray, “Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data—a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals,” Mammal Review, vol. 20, no. 2-3, pp. 97–123, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. L. Kramer and M. R. Chapman, “Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function,” Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 65–79, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Bell and D. L. Kramer, “Territoriality and habitat use by juvenile blue tangs, Acanthurus coeruleus,” Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 401–409, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Eristhee and H. A. Oxenford, “Home range size and use of space by Bermuda chub Kyphosus sectatrix (L.) in two marine reserves in the Soufrière Marine Management Area, St Lucia, West Indies,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 59, pp. 129–151, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. K. Bolden, Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus, Pisces: Serranidae) movement in the Bahamas, as determined by ultrasonic telemetry [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Miami, Miami, Fla, USA, 2001.
  8. G. Lembo, M. T. Spedicato, F. Økland et al., “A wireless communication system for determining site fidelity of juvenile dusky groupers Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) using coded acoustic transmitters,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 483, pp. 249–257, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Baras, B. Togola, B. Sicard, and V. Bénech, “Behaviour of tigerfish Hydrocynus brevis in the River Niger, Mali, as revealed by simultaneous telemetry of activity and swimming depth,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 483, pp. 103–110, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. A. Farmer and J. S. Ault, “Grouper and snapper movements and habitat use in Dry Tortugas, Florida,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 433, pp. 169–184, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. A. Meester, A. Mehrotra, J. S. Ault, and E. K. Baker, “Designing marine reserves for fishery management,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1031–1043, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Bohnsack, J. S. Ault, and B. Causey, “Why have no-take marine protected areas?” American Fisheries Society Symposium, vol. 2004, no. 42, pp. 185–193, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. S. Ault, J. A. Bohnsack, S. G. Smith, and J. Luo, “Towards sustainable multispecies fisheries in the Florida, USA, coral reef ecosystem,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 595–622, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. S. Ault, S. G. Smith, J. A. Bohnsack, J. Luo, D. E. Harper, and D. B. McClellan, “Building sustainable fisheries in Florida's coral reef ecosystem: positive signs in the dry tortugas,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 633–654, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. S. Ault, S. G. Smith, J. A. Bohnsack et al., “Assessing coral reef fish changes and marine reserve dynamics in the Dry Tortugas, Florida USA,” Fisheries Research, vol. 144, pp. 28–37, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. E. P. Odum and E. J. Kuenzler, “Measurement of territory and home range size in birds,” Auk, vol. 72, pp. 128–137, 1955. View at Google Scholar
  17. B. J. Worton, “Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home- range studies,” Ecology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 164–168, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. M. St. Mary, C. W. Osenberg, T. K. Frazer, and W. J. Lindberg, “Stage structure, density dependence and the efficacy of marine reserves,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 675–690, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. R. Dixon and J. A. Chapman, “Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas,” Ecology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1040–1044, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  20. R. A. Powell, “Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators,” in Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences, L. Boitani and T. Fuller, Eds., pp. 65–110, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. A. Burgman and J. C. Fox, “Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning,” Animal Conservation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. L. Beyer, “Geospatial Modelling Environment (Version 0. 6. 0. 0),” (software), 2012, http://www.spatialecology.com/gme/.
  23. D. E. Seaman and R. A. Powell, “An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis,” Ecology, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 2075–2085, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Duong and M. L. Hazelton, “Convergence rates for unconstrained bandwidth matrix selectors in multivariate kernel density estimation,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 417–433, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Holgate, “Random walk models for animal behavior,” in Statistical Ecology: Sampling and Modeling Biological Popuations and Population Dynamics, G. Patil, E. Pielou, and W. Walters, Eds., vol. 2 of Penn State Statistics, pp. 1–12, Penn State University Press, University Park, PA, USA, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Okubo, Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Models, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1980.
  27. P. R. Moorcroft and M. A. Lewis, Mechanistic Home Range Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2006.
  28. N. A. Farmer, J. S. Ault, S. G. Smith, and E. C. Franklin, “Methods for assessment of short-term coral reef fish movements within an acoustic array,” Movement Ecology, vol. 1, article 7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. J. Fox, Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models, Sage, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2009.
  30. M. J. North, N. T. Collier, and J. R. Vos, “Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit,” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. Collier, “RePast: An Agent-based Ecological Modeling Toolkit,” Available at repast.sourceforge.net, 2008.
  32. R. G. Ford, “Home range in a patchy environment: optimal foraging predictions,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 315–326, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Börger, B. D. Dalziel, and J. M. Fryxell, “Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research,” Ecology Letters, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 637–650, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Turchin, Quantitative Analysis of Movement, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 1998.
  35. A. Okubo and S. Levin, Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
  36. M. S. Mitchell and R. A. Powell, “A mechanistic home range model for optimal use of spatially distributed resources,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 177, no. 1-2, pp. 209–232, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. L. Smith, “Synopsis of biological data on groupers (Epinephelus and allied genera) of the western North Atlantic,” FAO Fisheries Biology Synopsis, no. 23, 61 pages, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  38. J. E. Randall, “Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies,” Studies in Tropical Oceanography, University of Miami, vol. 5, pp. 665–847, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Coscoy, E. Huguet, and F. Amblard, “Statistical analysis of sets of random walks: how to resolve their generating mechanism,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 69, pp. 2467–2492, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  40. S. Benhamou, “Detecting an orientation component in animal paths when the preferred direction is individual-dependent,” Ecology, vol. 87, pp. 518–528, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  41. J. L. Funk, “Movement of stream fishes in Missouri,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, vol. 85, pp. 39–57, 1957. View at Google Scholar
  42. E. B. Smithson and C. E. Johnston, “Movement patterns of stream fishes in a Ouachita Highlands stream: an examination of the restricted movement paradigm,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 847–853, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. C. Lindeman, R. Pugliese, G. T. Waugh, and J. S. Ault, “Developmental patterns within a multispecies reef fishery: management applications for essential fish habitats and protected areas,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 929–956, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A.-M. Eklund, D. B. McClellan, and D. E. Harper, “Black grouper aggregations in relation to protected areas within the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 721–728, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. L. Burton, K. J. Brennan, R. C. Muñoz, and R. O. Parker Jr., “Preliminary evidence of increased spawning aggregations of mutton snapper (Lutjanus analis) at Riley's Hump two years after establishment of the Tortugas South Ecological Reserve,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 404–410, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. W. Laundré and B. L. Keller, “Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review,” The Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 127–139, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  47. T. W. Schoener, “An empirically based estimate of home range,” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 281–325, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. D. Samuel, D. J. Pierce, and E. O. Garton, “Identifying areas of concentrated use within the home range,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 711–719, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. T. Polacheck, “Year-round closed areas as a management tool,” Natural Resource Modeling, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 327–354, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. E. Demartini, “Modeling the potential of fishery reserves for managing Pacific coral reef fishes,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 414–427, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Rakitin and D. L. Kramer, “Effect of a marine reserve on the distribution of coral reef fishes in Barbados,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 131, no. 1–3, pp. 97–113, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. U. R. Sumaila, “Protected marine reserves as fisheries management tools: a bioeconomic analysis,” Fisheries Research, vol. 37, no. 1–3, pp. 287–296, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. J. Fogarty, “Essential habitat, marine reserves and fishery management,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 133–134, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Guénette and T. J. Pitcher, “An age-structured model showing the benefits of marine reserves in controlling overexploitation,” Fisheries Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 295–303, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Y. Xiao, “An individual-based approach to evaluating experimental designs for estimating rates of fish movement from tag recoveries,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 128, no. 2-3, pp. 149–163, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. T. J. Pitcher, R. Watson, N. Haggan et al., “Marine reserves and the restoration of fisheries and marine ecosystems in the South China Sea,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 543–566, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Sladek Nowlis and C. M. Roberts, “Fisheries benefits and optimal design of marine reserves,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 604–616, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. A. Watson, J. Alder, and C. Walters, “A dynamic mass-balance model for marine protected areas,” Fish and Fisheries, vol. 1, pp. 94–98, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  59. J. N. Sanchirico and J. E. Wilen, “Bioeconomics of spatial exploitation in a patchy environment,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 129–150, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus