Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 684587, 23 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/684587
Review Article

A Review of Norms and Normative Multiagent Systems

1College of Information Technology, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
2Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia

Received 26 February 2014; Accepted 18 May 2014; Published 9 July 2014

Academic Editor: Tiaojun Xiao

Copyright © 2014 Moamin A. Mahmoud et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. B. Cialdini and M. R. Trost, “Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance,” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, Eds., vol. 2, pp. 151–192, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. Melnyk, What is normal to do? social norms as determinants of consumer decision making [Ph.D. thesis], Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2011.
  3. S. Sen and S. Airiau, “Emergence of norms through social learning,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '07), pp. 1507–1512, Hyderabad, India, January 2007. View at Scopus
  4. H. P. Young, “Social norms,” in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Ahmad, An agent-based framework incorporting rules, norms and emotions (OP-RND-E) [Ph.D. thesis], Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Selangor, Malaysia, 2012.
  6. M. Alberti, A. S. Gomes, R. Goncalves, J. Leite, and M. Slota, “Normative systems represented as hybrid knowledge bases,” in Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA '11), vol. 6814 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 330–346, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Hollander and A. Wu, “The current state of normative agent-based systems,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 14, no. 2, article 6, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz, “On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies (preliminary report),” in Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '92), pp. 276–281, San Jose, Calif, USA, July 1992. View at Scopus
  9. Y. Zhang and J. Leezer, “Emergence of social norms in complex networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE '09), pp. 549–555, Vancouver, Canada, August 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Verhagen, Norm Autonomous Agents, Department of System and Computer Sciences, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, 2000.
  11. B. T. R. Savarimuthu, M. Purvis, and M. Purvis, “Social norm emergence in virtual agent societies (short paper),” in Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS '08), pp. 1521–1524, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, Estoril, Portugal, May 2008.
  12. M. L. Anderson and H. F. Taylor, Sociology: Understanding a Diverse Society, Thomson Learning, 2000.
  13. C. Horne, “Sociological perspectives on the emergence of norms,” in Social Norms, M. Hechter and K. Opp, Eds., pp. 3–34, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. Hexmoor, S. G. Venkata, and D. Hayes, “Modelling social norms in multiagent systems,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 49–71, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Verhagen, “Norms and artificial agents,” in Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Agent-Based Social Simulation, ESPRIT Network of Excellence on Agent-Based Computing, Amsterdam, Holland, November 2001.
  16. J. Bendor and P. Swistak, “The evolution of norms,” The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1493–1545, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. R. Ehrlich and S. A. Levin, “The evolution of norms,” PLoS Biology, vol. 3, no. 6, p. e194, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Therborn, “Back to norms! on the scope and dynamics of norms and normative action,” Current Sociology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 863–880. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Tuomela, The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Norms, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, USA, 1995.
  20. B. T. R. Savarimuthu and S. Cranefield, “A categorization of simulation works on norms,” in Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar 09121: Normative Multi-Agent Systems, G. Boella, P. Noriega, and G. Pigozzi, Eds., Dagstuhl, Leibniz, Germany, March 2009.
  21. G. Boella and L. V. D. Torre, “A game-theoretic approach to normative multi-agent systems,” in Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar: Normative Multi-Agent Systems, Dagstuhl, Germany, March 2007.
  22. B. T. R. Savarimuthu, M. Purvis, S. Cranefield, and M. Purvis, “How do norms emerge in multi-agent societies? Mechanisms design,” The Information Science Discussion Paper Series-2007, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. B. Cialdini, R. R. Reno, and C. A. Kallgren, “A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1015–1026, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. K. Lapinski and R. N. Rimal, “An explication of social norms,” Communication Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 127–147, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Villatoro, “Self-organization in decentralized agent societies through social norms,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS '11), pp. 1373–1374, May 2011.
  26. J. Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge Harvard University Press, 1998.
  27. H. P. Young, “The evolution of conventions,” Econometrica, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 57–84, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Villatoro, S. Sen, and J. Sabater-Mir, “Of social norms and sanctioning: a game theoretical overview,” International Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  29. M. J. Piskorski and A. Gorbatai, “Testing Coleman's social-norm enforcement mechanism: evidence from wikipedia,” HBS Working, vol. 11, no. 55, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. P. Caire, “A normative multi-agent systems approach to the use of conviviality for digital cities,” in Proceedings of The International Conference on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems III (COIN '07), pp. 245–260, 2007.
  31. G. Boella and L. V. D. Torre, “Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multi-agent systems,” in Proceedings of The 9th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 255–266, Whistler, Canada, 2004.
  32. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, “Substantive and procedural norms in normative multiagent systems,” Journal of Applied Logic, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 152–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Rubino, A. Omicini, and E. Denti, “Computational institutions for modelling norm-regulated MAS: an approach based on coordination artifacts,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Workshops (AAMAS '05), pp. 127–141, 2005.
  34. A. Peczenik, On Law and Reason, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009.
  35. B. Loges, “A norm in the making? The emergence of the “responsibility to protect” (R2P) and UN security council deliberations,” in Proceedings of the 7th Pan-European International Relations Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, September 2010.
  36. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, “An architecture of a normative system,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS '06), pp. 229–231, Hakodate, Japan, May 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. G. Lawrence, “Procedural norms and tolerance: a reassessment,” The American PoliticalScience Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 80–100, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Finnemore and K. Sikkink, “International norm dynamics and political change,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 887–917, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. C. Bicchieri, The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  40. B. T. R. Savarimuthu, Mechanisms for norm emergence and norm identification in multi-agent societies [Ph.D. thesis], University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2011.
  41. J. Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap Press, 1990.
  42. G. Boella, L. van der Torre, and H. Verhagen, “Introduction to normative multiagent systems,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Normative Multiagent Systems (NorMAS '05), pp. 1–7, April 2005. View at Scopus
  43. C. E. Alchourron and E. Bulygin, Normative Systems, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1971.
  44. J. Broersen, M. Dastani, and L. V. D. Torre, “Resolving conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions, and desires,” in Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty: The 6th European Conference, ECSQARU 2001 Toulouse, France, September 19–21, 2001 Proceedings, vol. 2143 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 568–579, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. F. Sadri, K. Stathis, and F. Toni, “Normative KGP agents,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 101–126, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Ahmad, M. Ahmed, M. Z. M. Yusof, M. S. Ahmad, and A. Mustapha, “Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems,” in 2011 7th International Conference on Information Technology in Asia: Emerging Convergences and Singularity of Forms (CITA'11), Kuching, Sarawak, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz, “On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 73, no. 1-2, pp. 231–252, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. Castelfranchi and R. Conte, Cognitive and Social Action, UCL Press, London, UK, 1995.
  49. M. Boman, “Norms in artificial decision making,” Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–35, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. F. Dignum, “Autonomous agents with norms,” Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Walker and M. Wooldridge, “Understanding the emergence of conventions in multi-agent systems,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS '95), V. Lesser, Ed., pp. 384–389, Menlo Park, Calif, USA, 1995.
  52. R. Axelrod, The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1997.
  53. A. Jones and J. Carmo, “Deontic logic and contrary-toduties,” in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay, Ed., pp. 203–279, Kluwer Academic, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  54. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, “Rational norm creation: attributing mental attitudes to normative systems, part 2,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL '03), pp. 81–82, ACM, Edinburgh, UK, June 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, “Permissions and obligations in hierarchical normative systems,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL '03), pp. 109–118, ACM, Edinburgh, UK, June 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. G. Boella and L. van der Torre, “Game specification in normative multiagent system: the trias politica,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT '04), pp. 504–508, Beijing, China, September 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. L. Vanhée, H. Aldewereld, and F. Dignum, “Implementing norms?” in Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT '11), pp. 13–16, Lyon, France, August 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. Astefanaoei, M. Dastani, J. J. Meyer, and F. S. d. Boer, “A verification framework for normative multi-agent systems,” in Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: 11th Pacific Rim International Conference on Multi-Agents, PRIMA 2008, Hanoi, Vietnam, December 15-16, 2008. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 54–65, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. B. Lacroix, P. Mathieu, and A. Kemeny, “The use of norms’ violation to model agents’ behavioral variety,” in Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV: COIN 2008 International Workshops COIN@AAMAS 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12, 2008 COIN@AAAI 2008, Chicago, USA, July 14, 2008, Revised Selected Papers, vol. 5428 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 220–234, AAMAS, Estoril, Portugal, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. M. Kollingbaum, I. J. Jureta, W. Vasconcelos, and K. Sycara, “Automated requirements-driven definition of norms for the regulation of behavior in multi-agent systems,” in Proceedings of the AISB Workshop on Behaviour Regulation in Multi-Agent Systems (AISB '08), pp. 43–48, Aberdeen, UK, April 2008. View at Scopus
  61. M. Dastani and L. van der Torre, “Programming BOID-plan agents deliberating about conflicts among defeasible mental attitudes and plans,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS '04), pp. 706–713, IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, USA, July 2004. View at Scopus
  62. G. Governatori and A. Rotolo, “BIO logical agents: norms, beliefs, intentions in defeasible logic,” in Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar: Normative Multi-agent Systems, Dagstuhl, Germany, March 2007.
  63. J. Meyer and R. Wieringa, Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1993.
  64. G. H. V. Wright, “Deontic Logic,” Mind, vol. 60, no. 237, pp. 1–15.
  65. T. Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehavior, W. W. Norton and Company, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  66. C. Castelfranchi, R. Conte, and M. Paolucci, “Normative reputation and the cost of compliance,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 1, no. 3, article 3, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  67. N. Saam and A. Harrier, “Simulating norms, social inequality, and functional change in artificial societies,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 2, no. 1, article 2.
  68. D. Hales, “Group reputation supports beneficent norms,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, no. 4, article 4, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. C. Caldas and H. Coelho, “The origin of institutions: socio-economic processes, choice, norms, and conventions,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 2, no. 2, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  70. J. M. Epstein, “Learning to be thoughtless: social norms and individual computation,” Computational Economics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. F. Flentge, D. Polani, and T. Uthmann, “Modelling the emergence of possession norms using memes,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4, no. 4, article 3, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. Nakamaru and S. A. Levin, “Spread of two linked social norms on complex interaction networks,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. M. Galan and L. R. Izquierdo, “Appearances can be deceiving: lessons learned re-implementing Axelrod's 'evolutionary approach to norms',” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8, no. 3, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. Grossi, D. Gabbay, and L. van der Torre, “The norm implementation problem in normative multi-agent systems,” in Specification and Verification of Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 195–224, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. A. P. de Pinninck, C. Sierra, and M. Schorlemmer, “A multiagent network for peer norm enforcement,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 397–424, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. Elster, Alchemies of the Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999.
  77. N. Oren, M. Croitoru, S. Miles, and M. Luck, “Understanding permissions through graphical norms,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT '10), Toronto, Canada, July 2010.
  78. R. Posner and E. Rasmusen, “Creating and enforcing norms, with special reference to sanctions,” International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 369–382, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. F. L. Y. López, M. Luck, and M. d'Inverno, “A normative framework for agent-based systems,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Normative Multi-Agent Systems, Hatfield, UK, April 2005. View at Scopus
  80. M. J. Hoffmann, “Entrepreneurs and norm dynamics: an agent-based model of the norm life cycle,” Technical Report, Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Delaware, Newark, Del, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  81. P. Mukheriee, S. Sen, and S. Airiau, “Emergence of norms with biased interactions in heterogeneous agent societies,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology—Workshops, pp. 512–515, IEEE Computer Society, Silicon Valley, Calif, USA, November 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. G. Andrighetto, R. Conte, P. Turrini, and M. Paolucci, “Emergence in the loop: simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation,” in Normative Multi-Agent Systems, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Internationales Begegnungs-und Forschungszentrumfür Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  83. G. Andrighetto, M. Campenni, F. Cecconi, and R. Conte, “Normal = normative? The role of intelligent agents in norm innovation,” in Normative Multi-Agent Systems, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  84. C. Castlefranchi, M. Miceli, and A. Cesta, “Dependence relations among autonomous agents (abstract),” ACM SIGOIS Bulletin, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 14, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. A. J. I. Jones and M. J. Sergot, “A formal characterisation of institutionalised power,” Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 427–443, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. C. Castelfranchi, “The micro-macro constitution of power,” ProtoSociology, vol. 18-19, pp. 208–268, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  87. L. y. López, Social powers and norms: impact on agent behaviour [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2003.
  88. Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz, “On the emergence of social conventions: modeling, analysis, and simulations,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 94, no. 1-2, pp. 139–166, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. O. Sen and S. Sen, “Effects of social network topology and options on norm emergence,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems (COIN '09), pp. 211–222, 2010.
  90. L. Brooks, W. Iba, and S. Sen, “Modeling the emergence and convergence of norms,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '11), T. Walsh, Ed., pp. 97–102, Barcelona, Spain, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Benea, T. A. Tărtăreanu, and M. Trăscău, “Norm emergence in multi-agent systems based on social interactions,” Computer Science Master Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–24, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  92. C. D. Hollander and A. S. Wu, “Using the process of norm emergence to model consensus formation,” in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO '11), pp. 148–157, IEEE, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, October 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. J. Vázquez-Salceda, H. Aldewereld, and F. Dignum, “Implementing norms in multi-agent systems,” in Multiagent System Technologies: Second German Conference, MATES 2004, Erfurt, Germany, September 29-30, 2004. Proceedings, vol. 3187 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 313–327, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. C. von Scheve, D. Moldt, J. Fix, and R. von Lüde, “My agents love to conform: emotions, norms, and social control in natural and artificial societies,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Normative Multi-Agent Systems (NorMAS '05), Hatfield, UK, April 2005. View at Scopus
  95. A. Staller and P. Petta, “Introducing emotions into the computational study of social norms: a first evaluation,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4, no. 1, article 2, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. S. Fagundes, Sequential decision making in normative environments [Ph.D. thesis], Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, PublicacionesCetinia, 2012.
  97. J. Fix, C. von Scheve, and D. Moldt, “Emotion-based norm enforcement and maintenance in multi-agent systems: foundations and petri net modeling,” in Procedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS '06), pp. 105–107, Hakodate, Japan, May 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. H. L. Cardoso and E. Oliveira, “Adaptive deterrence sanctions in a normative framework,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT '09), pp. 36–43, Milan, Italy, September 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. R. Axelrod, “An evolutionary approach to norms,” The American Political Science Review, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 1095–1111, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. J. Vázquez-Salceda, H. Aldewereld, and F. Dignum, “Norms in multiagent systems: from theory to practice,” Computer Systems Science and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 4, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. A. Grizard, L. Vercouter, T. Stratulat, and G. Muller, “A peer-to-peer normative system to achieve social order,” in Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II: AAMAS 2006 and ECAI 2006 International Workshops, COIN 2006 Hakodate, Japan, May 9, 2006 Riva del Garda, Italy, August 28, 2006, vol. 4386 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 274–289, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. C. Castelfranchi and R. Falcone, “Principles of trust in mas: cognitive anatomy, social importance and quantification,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (ICMAS '98), pp. 72–79, IEEE, Paris, France, July 1998.
  103. J. Sabater and C. Sierra, “REGRET: reputation in gregarious societies,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS '01), J. P. Müller, E. Andre, S. Sen, and C. Frasson, Eds., pp. 194–195, ACM Press, Montreal, Canada, May-June 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. R. Conte and M. Paolucci, “Intelligent social learning,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4, no. 1, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. A. Abdulrahman, A framework for decentralized trust reasoning [Ph.D. thesis], University of London, London, UK, 2004.
  106. G. Muller and L. Vercouter, “Decentralized monitoring of agent communication with a reputation model,” in Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies: Theory and Applications in HCI and E-Commerce, vol. 3577 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 144–161, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. G. Zacharia, A. Moukas, and P. Maes, “Collaborative reputation mechanisms in electronic marketplaces,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '99), January 1999. View at Scopus
  108. D. McKnight and N. Chervany, “Trust and distrust definitions: one bite at a time,” in Trust in Cyber-Societies: Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives, vol. 2246 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 27–54, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. S. Casare and J. Sichman, “Using a functional ontology of reputation to interoperate different agent reputation models,” Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 79–94, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. D. Keltner and B. N. Buswell, “Embarrassment: its distinct form and appeasement functions,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 250–270, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. A. L. C. Bazzan, D. F. Adamatti, and R. H. Bordini, “Extending the computational study of social norms with a systematic model of emotion,” in Proceedings of the 16th Brazillian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA'02), pp. 108–117, Porto de Galinhas/Recife, Brazil, 2002.
  112. G. Boella, L. V. D. Torre, and H. Verhagen, “Ten challenges for normative multi-agent systems,” in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, R. Bordini, M. Dastani, J. Dix, and A. E. Fallah-Seghrouchni, Eds., Programming Multi-Agent Systems No. 08361, SchlossDagstuhl—Leibniz-Zentrumfuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  113. R. Conte and F. Dignum, “From social monitoring to normative influence,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4, no. 2, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. D. Henderson, “Norms, invariance, and explanatory relevance,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 324–338, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. M. Hidalgo-Herrero, I. Rodríguez, and F. Rubio, “Comparing learning methods,” International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 12–26, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. G. Andrighetto, M. Campenni, F. Cecconi, and R. Conte, “The complex loop of norm emergence: a simulation model,” in Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena, S.-H. Chen, C. Cioffi-Revilla, N. Gilbert et al., Eds., vol. 7 of Agent-Based Social Systems, pp. 19–35, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  117. P. Cong-Vinh, “Categorical approaches to models and behaviors of autonomic agent systems,” International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. S. Natkin and C. Yan, “Adaptive narration in multiplayer ubiquitous games,” International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 61–83, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. T. Bosse, C. Gerritsen, and M. C. A. Klein, “Agent-based simulation of social learning in criminology,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART '09), pp. 5–13, Porto, Portugal, January 2009. View at Scopus
  120. S. Dourlens and A. Ramdane-Cherif, “Cognitive memory for semantic agents architecture in robotic interaction,” International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. J. Campos, M. López-Sánchez, and M. Esteva, “A case-based reasoning approach for norm adaptation,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems (HAIS '10), pp. 168–176, Springer, San Sebastián, Spain, June 2010.
  122. A. Symeonidis and P. Mitkas, “A methodology for predicting agent behavior by the use of data mining techniques,” in Autonomous Intelligent Systems: Agents and Data Mining: International Workshop, AIS-ADM 2005, St. Petersburg, Russia, June 6-8, 2005 Proceedings, vol. 3505 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 161–174, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. B. T. R. Savarimuthu, S. Cranefield, M. Purvis, and M. Purvis, “Norm identification in multi-agent societies,” Discussion Paper, Department of Information Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  124. B. T. R. Savarimuthu, S. Cranefield, M. A. Purvis, and M. K. Purvis, “Obligation norm identification in agent societies,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13, no. 4, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. K. Dautenhahn, C. L. Nehaniv, and A. Alissandrakis, “Learning by experience from others—social learning and imitation in animals and robots,” in Adaptivity and Learning: An Interdisciplinary Debate, R. Kühn, R. Menzel, W. Menzel, U. Ratsch, M. M. Richter, and I. O. Stamatescu, Eds., pp. 217–421, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  126. S. Kotsiantis and D. Kanellopoulos, “Association rules mining: a recent overview,” International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 71–82, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  127. A. Ogunde, O. Follorunso, A. Sodiiya, J. Oguntuase, and G. Ogunlleye, “Improved cost models for agent-based association rule mining in distributed database,” Anale. SeriaInformatica, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 231–250, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  128. A. L. Symeonidis and P. A. Mitkas, “Agent intelligence through data mining,” in Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Machine Learning and The 10th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 2006.
  129. R. Boyd and P. Richerson, Culture and the Evolutionary Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1985.
  130. S. Younger, “Reciprocity, normative reputation, and the development of mutual obligation in gift-giving societies,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 7, no. 1, article 5, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. F. A. C. C. Chalub, F. C. Santos, and J. M. Pacheco, “The evolution of norms,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 241, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. D. Villatoro and J. Sabater-Mir, “Categorizing social norms in a simulated resource gathering society,” in Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV: COIN 2008 International Workshops, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 235–249, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  133. R. Boyd and P. J. Richerson, “Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 287–296, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. J. Henrich, R. Boyd, and P. J. Richerson, “Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution,” Human Nature, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 119–137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. W. Ross, A. Morris, and M. Ulieru, “Exploring the impact of network structure on organizational culture using multi-agent systems,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Complex Systems (ICCS '11), pp. 1228–1236.
  136. M. W. Macy and R. Willer, “From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 28, pp. 143–166, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. S. P. Borgatti and P. C. Foster, “The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology,” Journal of Management, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 991–1013, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. C. Macal and M. J. North, “Agent-based modeling and simulation,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (WSC '09), M. D. Rossetti, R. R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin, and R. G. Ingalls, Eds., pp. 86–98, IEEE, Austin, Tex, USA, Decemper 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. D. Mungovan, E. Howley, and J. Duggan, “Norm convergence in populations of dynamically interacting agents,” in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, L. Coyle and J. Freyne, Eds., vol. 6206 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 219–230, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. J. Fan and M. H. Ammar, “Dynamic topology configuration in service overlay networks: a study of reconfiguration policies,” in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM '06), Barcelona, Spain, April 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. J. E. Kittock, “Emergent conventions and the structure of multi-agent systems,” in 1993 Lectures in Complex Systems, L. Nadel and D. L. Stein, Eds., Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  142. N. Griffiths and M. Luck, “Changing neighbours: improving tag-based cooperation,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS '10), pp. 249–256, Ontario, Canada, May 2010.
  143. M. C. González, P. G. Lind, and H. J. Herrmann, “Networks based on collisions among mobile agents,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 224, no. 1-2, pp. 137–148, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. T. Fenner, M. Levene, G. Loizou, and G. Roussos, “A stochastic evolutionary growth model for social networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 51, no. 16, pp. 4586–4595, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. X. F. Wang and G. Chen, “Complex networks: small-world, scale-free and beyond,” IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–20, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. P. Erdös and A. Renyi, “On random graphs—I,” Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, vol. 6, pp. 290–297, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  147. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 509–512, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. M. Mitchell, “Complex systems: network thinking,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 170, no. 18, pp. 1194–1212, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. R. Conte, G. Andrighetto, and M. Campenni, “Internalizing norms, a cognitive model of (social) norms’ internalization,” International Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  150. E. Q. Campbell, “The internalization of moral norms,” Sociometry, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 391–412, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  151. F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck, “Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents,” in Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS '09), vol. 1, pp. 177–184, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, Budapest, Hungary, May 2009.
  152. G. Andrighetto and R. Conte, “On Norm Internalization,” 2009, http://www.agreementtechnologies.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2009/10/internalization.pdf.
  153. M. Neumann, “Norm internalisation in human and artificial intelligence,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13, no. 1, article 12, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. G. Andrighetto, D. Villatoro, and R. Conte, “Norm internalization in artificial societies,” AI Communications, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 325–339, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. J. X. Eguia, A Theory of Discrimination and Assimilation, New York University, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  156. D. Donetto and F. Cecconi, “The emergence of shared social representations in complex networks,” in Proceedings of the Social Networks and Multi-Agent Systems Symposium (SNAMAS '09), pp. 42–45, Edinburgh, UK, April 2009. View at Scopus
  157. I. Konya, “A dynamic model of cultural assimilation,” Working Papers in Economics 546, Boston College, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  158. A. Quamrul and O. Galor, Cultural Assimilation, Cultural Diffusion and the Origin of the Wealth of Nations, Brown University, mimeo, 2007.