Research Article
A Comparative Analysis of Swarm Intelligence Techniques for Feature Selection in Cancer Classification
Table 10
Comparison of classification accuracy with other methods for AML-ALL.
| Reference (year) | Methodology | Maximum classification accuracy in percentage |
| Alonso-González et al. (2012) [18] | Combination of attribute selection and classification algorithm | 100 | Maji (2012) [19] | Mutual Information | 100 | Chandra and Gupta (2011) [13] | Effective range based gene selection | 98.61 | Chuang et al. (2011) [10] | Correlation-based feature selection (CFS) and Taguchi genetic algorithm (TGA) | 100 | Dagliyan et al. (2011) [11] | HBE (hyperbox enclosure) method | 100 | Martinez et al. (2010) [7] | Swarm intelligence feature selection algorithm | 100 | Liu et al. (2010) [9] | EGS (ensemble gene selection) method | 100 | Chopra et al. (2010) [8] | Based on gene doublets | 100 | Wang and Gotoh (2009) [6] | Rough sets | 100 | Vanichayobon et al. (2007) [5] | Gene selection step and clustering cancer data by using self-organizing map | 100 |
Jirapech-Umpai and Sturat (2005) [4] | Evolutionary algorithm | 98.24 | This work | PSO | 100 | This work | Cuckoo search | 100 | This work | SFL | 100 | This work | SFLLF | 100 |
|
|