Research Article

A Retrospective Review of Outcomes of Dental Treatment Performed for Special Needs Patients under General Anaesthesia: 2-Year Follow-Up

Table 2

Failures rates of different restorative procedures.

Restorative materialsTotal number of restorationsNumber of failed restorationsFailure rate (%)Post hoc

Amalgam restorations46613.0c
Composite restorations61113922.7
Glass ionomer cement 39410.2
Stainless steel crowns 28911 3.8 e

Statistically significant at < 0.01; Pearson’s chi-square test.
Post hoc < 0.05, a = amalgam versus composite; b = amalgam versus GIC; c = amalgam versus SSC; d = composite versus GIC.
e = composite versus SSC; f = GIC versus SSC.