Research Article
A Retrospective Review of Outcomes of Dental Treatment Performed for Special Needs Patients under General Anaesthesia: 2-Year Follow-Up
Table 2
Failures rates of different restorative procedures.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistically significant at < 0.01; Pearson’s chi-square test. Post hoc < 0.05, a = amalgam versus composite; b = amalgam versus GIC; c = amalgam versus SSC; d = composite versus GIC. e = composite versus SSC; f = GIC versus SSC. |