Research Article
Optimal Battery Sizing in Photovoltaic Based Distributed Generation Using Enhanced Opposition-Based Firefly Algorithm for Voltage Rise Mitigation
Table 2
Comparison of performances for GSA, FA, and EOFA.
| Function | Optimization algorithm | GSA | FA | EOFA | Optimized fitness value | Best | Average | Worst | Best | Average | Worst | Best | Average | Worst |
| F1 | 0.0096 | 0.015 | 0.024 | 18.52 | 19.60 | 19.97** | | | | F2 | | | | | 0.069 | 0.91** | | | 0.0014 | F3 | | | | 0.00021 | 0.55 | 3.35** | 0* | | | F4 | | | | | 0.30 | 2.08** | 0* | | | F5 | | 0.0014 | | 446.74 | 592.46 | 686.12** | 0* | | | F6 | | | | | 0.043 | 0.58** | | | | F7 | −9.46* | −8.81 | −7.73 | −6.34 | −4.11 | −2.55** | −9.33 | −8.90 | −7.85 | F8 | 1 | | | | | | | | | F9 | 0.0014 | 0.0052 | 0.012 | 3658.18 | 5851.00 | 9794.40** | | | | F10 | 15.99 | 34.50 | 53.79 | 353.45 | 394.46 | 429.40** | 0* | 0.99 | 3.19 | F11 | 25.75* | 27.53 | 29.47 | 710546.20 | 1211549 | 1629028** | 28.00 | 28.73 | 28.94 | F12 | 8389.22 | 9719.90 | 10278.85 | 8981.36 | 10257.49 | 11111.71** | 656.6* | 1094.737 | 1624.44 | F13 | | | | 111.90 | 139.60 | 156.75** | | | | F14 | 0.0019 | 0.0048 | 0.011 | 6228.04 | 8787.32 | 10279.92** | | | | F15 | 24.16 | 51.79 | 73.96 | 708.22 | | | | | |
|
|