The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 784613 |

Moses S. Owolabi, Eduardo Padilla-Camberos, Akintayo L. Ogundajo, Isiaka A. Ogunwande, Guido Flamini, Olaniyi K. Yusuff, Kirk Allen, Karen Isabel Flores-Fernandez, Jose Miguel Flores-Fernandez, "Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Composition of the Morinda lucida Essential Oil against Pulse Beetle Callosobruchus maculatus", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 784613, 7 pages, 2014.

Insecticidal Activity and Chemical Composition of the Morinda lucida Essential Oil against Pulse Beetle Callosobruchus maculatus

Academic Editor: Alexsandro Branco
Received22 Jan 2014
Accepted04 Jul 2014
Published20 Jul 2014


Insecticidal activity of essential oil extracted from Morinda lucida was tested on pulse beetle Callosobruchus maculatus, which is a pest that causes serious damage to several pulses. The insecticidal activity was compared with two pesticides, Phostoxin and Primo-ban-20. 120 mixed sex adult C. maculatus were introduced, along with 30 g of cowpeas. Four concentrations (0.40, 0.20, 0.10, and 0.05 μg/mL) of the M. lucida essential oil, Phostoxin, and Primo-ban-20 were tested. Essential oil chemical composition was analyzed by GC-MS. M. lucida essential oil showed a high toxicological effect, producing 100% mortality after 72 hours at a dose of 0.20 μg/mL. M. lucida essential oil had a potent insecticidal activity (LC90 = 0.629 μg/mL) compared to both pesticides, Phostoxin (LC90 = 0.652 μg/mL) and Primo-ban-20 (LC90 = 0.726 μg/mL), at 24 h. The main compounds of the essential oil were the oxygenated monoterpenoids, 1,8-cineole (43.4%), and α-terpinyl acetate (14.5%), and the monoterpene hydrocarbons, mostly sabinene (8.2%) and β-pinene (4.0%). Results clearly indicate that M. lucida essential oil can be used as an effective alternative for pulse beetle C. maculatus control, and it could be tested against other pulse beetles affecting Asia and Africa and throughout the world, thereby reducing use of synthetic pesticides.

1. Introduction

Callosobruchus maculatus is an economically important pest of several pulses, including leguminous grains such as lentils, cowpeas, green gram, chickpea, black gram, soybean, and haricot beans [1, 2]. These pulses are important sources of vegetable protein for millions of people of tropical and subtropical regions of Asia and Africa. C. maculatus larvae bore into pulse grain or into stored crop, making it unfit for human consumption and unviable for replanting [35].

Control of insect pestsrelies heavily on the use of synthetic insecticides such as methyl bromide or phosphine. However, their intensive use has led to the development of genetic resistance by insect species, pest resurgence, residual toxicity, environmental hazards, and serious problems arising from factors such as direct toxicity to predators, pollinators, fish, and man [6]. As such, the use of methyl bromide is being restricted because of its potential to damage the ozone layer [7]. Susceptibility of crop plants to insect pests and increasing costs of application of the presently used synthetic pesticides have directed the need for effective, biodegradable pesticides [8, 9].

Because of their high volatility, plant extracts or plant compounds and the use of natural compounds with insecticidal activity provide a potential biodegradable alternative to synthetic pesticides [1012]. The contact and fumigant insecticidal activity of several plant essential oils and their constituents have been demonstrated against stored-product pests [1315], a number of bruchid pests [1618], and insects and mites [19].

Several botanical families for pest control are described, such as Meliaceae, Rutaceae, Asteraceae, Labiatae, and Malvaceae. Rubiaceae is a family of 630 genera and about 13,000 species [20]. Morinda lucida (Benth), a member of Rubiaceaefamily, is a medicinal plant of about 15 m tall with a dense crown of slender crooked branches approximately 20–30 cm in diameter. M. lucida commonly known by the Yoruba in southwestern part of Nigeria as “Oruwo” is widely distributed in West Africa and is used in African folk medicine to treat several diseases [21]. The leaves are bitter and are used by the natives to treat malaria, yellow fever, jaundice, hepatitis, eczema, edema, cough, hypertension, diabetes, and sexual weakness [20, 22, 23].

In a previous study, another species of the same genus, M. citrifolia, showed larvicidal activity against three species of mosquito vectors [24] and the biofriendly nature of M. lucida suggested the need to search for new properties of this plant; therefore the present study was conducted to determine the insecticidal activity of the essential oil of M. lucida against C. maculatus by dose response bioassays and to characterize its chemical composition for consideration as an alternative insecticide for pulse beetle.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The aerial parts of the M. lucida were collected from Apomu (7°19′48N, 4°10′47E), which is located in Osun State, Nigeria, and identified at the Herbarium of the Botany Department, University of Lagos, Nigeria, where voucher specimen number LUH 2637 was kept. The samples were air-dried, pulverized, and stored in polythene bag to reduce evaporation of the volatile oil.

To extract the essential oil, 500 g of pulverized sample was placed in a 5 L flask and distilled water was added to cover sample. Essential oil was obtained by hydrodistillation using glass modified Clevenger-type apparatus; the process ran for 4 h at normal atmospheric pressure and at 96-97°C inside the extractor. After the essential oil isolation, residual water was removed by filtration with anhydrous sodium sulphate, and then the essential oil was stored in an amber vial at 4°C for future analysis.

2.2. Gas Chromatography (GC) Analysis

GC analysis was performed with a HP-5890 Series II instrument equipped with a HP-Wax and HP-5 capillary columns (both 30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film thickness), working with the following temperature program: 60°C for 10 min, rising at 5°C/min to 220°C. The injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 250°C; carrier gas nitrogen (2 mL/min); detector dual, FID; split ratio 1 : 30. The volume injected was 0.5 μL. The relative proportions of the oil constituents were percentages obtained by FID peak-area normalization without the use of response factor.

2.3. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

GC-MS analysis was performed with a Varian CP-3800 gas chromatograph equipped with a HP-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film thickness) and a Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass detector. Analytical conditions were injector and transfer line temperature 220°C and 240°C, respectively; oven temperature was programmed from 60 to 240°C at 3°C/min. Carrier gas was helium at 1.0 mL/min flow rate. Injection volume was 0.2 μL (10% hexane solution) using a 1 : 30 split ratio. The mass spectrometer was operated at 70-eV ionization voltage. The acquisition mass range was 30 to at 1.0 scan/s.

2.4. Identification of the Volatile Compounds

The identification of the volatile constituents of the essential oil sample was made using the following criteria: (1) comparison of mass spectra with the Wiley library spectra 275 L (Rev.C.00.00) electronic database; (2) injection of authentic compounds from Sigma-Aldrich with a 95% minimum purity under the same analytical conditions; and (3) comparison of the retention index (RI) obtained by GC-MS with the RI theoretical in similar phases. The molecular weights of all the identified substances were confirmed by GC-MS, using MeOH as CI ionizing gas.

2.5. Insect Culture

Callosobruchus maculatus were reared on cowpea seeds (Vigna unguiculata) under controlled temperature and humidity at °C, % RH (12 h light cycle) and °C, % RH (12 h dark cycle). Adult insects of 8 days old were used for insecticidal test.

All experiments were carried out under the same environmental conditions as described above.

2.6. Insecticidal Activity of M. lucida Essential Oil

The insecticidal activity was evaluated as described by Ilboudo et al. [25]. One hundred and twenty mixed sex adult C. maculatus (8 days old) were put into a 500 mL glass bottle with 30 g of cowpea seeds and kept in the laboratory at °C, % RH (12 h light cycle) and °C, % RH (12 h dark cycle) for 72 h. Concentrations of the M. lucida essential oil diluted in acetone were tested on C. maculatus (0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.40 μg/mL). The appropriate concentrations were applied to filter paper (Whatman number 1, cut into 7 cm diameter) and immediately introduced into a glass bottle that was then hermetically sealed. For the control group, the insects were placed in the glass bottles under the same conditions but without the essential oil. Each concentration and control was replicated three times. Insect mortality was determined by observing the recovery of immobilized insects in 12 h intervals up to 72 h. When no antennal or leg movements were observed, insects were considered dead.

2.7. Insecticidal Activity of Commercial Pesticides

Two synthetic pesticides were purchased from Chemical and Allied company, Lagos, Nigeria. Phostoxin (55% Aluminium phosphide) and Primo-ban-20 (pirimiphos-methyl, emulsifiable concentrate 50%). The first is converted to phosphine gas, which is taken by the insect through its respiratory system and the second is able to penetrate the insect cuticle. Pellets of Phostoxin were divided into small pieces and weighed to achieve the appropriate concentrations and were applied according to manufacturer’s directions [26]. Primo-ban-20 was diluted to achieve the desired concentrations, from a stock solution of 2 μg/mL. Both pesticides were evaluated at the same concentrations as the essential oil in triplicate.

2.8. Mortality Determination

Ten pairs of adult C. maculatus were released each 12 h after exposure of essential oil up to 72 h. After a 12 h exposure period the containers were opened and the dead beetles were removed and recorded. Knocked-down adults were regarded as alive if they showed continued movement of their appendages by the touch of a fine brush. After observation, the containers were tightly closed. After every 12 h, new batches of twenty insects were released and the numbers of dead insects were recorded and the percentage of mortality was calculated and corrected using Abbott’s formula [27].

2.9. Data Analysis

Average percentage insect mortality was calculated from three replicates. Dosage-mortality responses were used to estimate LC50 (concentration causing 50% mortality) and LC90 (concentration causing 90% mortality) values at 24 and 48 h with Probit analysis [28] using Statgraphics 5.1 software. Insecticidal activity was considered significantly different when the 95% CI (confidence interval) fail to overlap.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition of Morinda lucida

The chemical composition analysis by GC-MS identified 63 components of M. lucida essential oil, containing mainly 1,8-cineole (43.4%) followed by α-terpinyl acetate (14.5%), sabinene (8.2%), and β-pinene (4.0%; Table 1).


(E) -Ocimene1054Tr
Cis-Sabinene hydrate10730.5
Cis- -Menth-2-en-1-ol11270.3
Trans- -Menth-2-en-1-ol11460.3
-Pinene oxide1162Tr
Trans- -Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol1191Tr
Cis-Verbenyl acetate12830.1
Isobornyl acetate12900.6
Trans-Sabinyl acetate12920.1
Trans-Pinocarvyl acetate13020.1
Neo-verbanol acetate13210.8
-Terpinyl acetate*135514.5
Cis-Carvyl acetate1367Tr
Neryl acetate13700.3
Geranyl acetate1388Tr
Methyl eugenol14091.4
( )-Cinnamyl acetate1450Tr
( )-Methyl isoeugenol1495Tr
Caryophyllene oxide15830.5
Total identified95.40

Major components are shown in bold.
These chemical components were identified by authentic compound injection.
KI Kovats retention indices.
Tr = trace amount <0.1%.
3.2. Mortality of Callosobruchus maculatus

The aerial parts of the M. lucida distillate yielded a 0.48% (v/w) essential oil. The insecticidal bioassay of the essential oil of M. lucida against C. maculatus (Figure 1) showed that the activity of the oil was both dose dependent and exposure dependent. At a dose of 0.05 μg/mL, the essential oil produced 59.4% mortality after 72 h (Figure 1(c)). The essential oil produced 33.3%, 56.7%, and 89.9% mortality after 24, 48, and 72 h at a dose of 0.10 μg/mL, respectively, while a dose of 0.20 μg/mL yielded mortality of 46.7%, 83.3%, and 100%, respectively, over the same time duration (Figure 1). The highest concentration of 0.40 μg/mL produced a mortality of 90% and 100% after 48 and 72 h, respectively (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)).

The synthetic pesticide Primo-ban-20 at 0.20 μg/mL had a lower mortality (36.7%) at 24 h, while Phostoxin had a 46.7% and 86.7% mortality after 24 h and 48 h at 0.20 μg/mL, respectively (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Both M. lucida essential oil and pesticides reached 100% mortality at 72 h at 0.20 μg/mL (Figure 1(c)). The negative control showed no activity except at 72 h (1.7%).

3.3. Determination of Insecticidal Activity

Probit analysis showed that M. lucida essential oil after 24 h presented an insecticidal activity (LC90 = 0.629 μg/mL) similar to Phostoxin (LC90 = 0.652 μg/mL) and Primo-ban-20 (LC90 = 0.726 μg/mL). At 24 h essential oil of M. lucida (LC50 = 0.298 μg/mL) and Phostoxin (LC50 = 0.295 μg/mL) were more efficient than Primo-ban-20 (LC50 = 0.393 μg/mL). At 48 h after exposure, there was no significant difference in LC50 between M. lucida essential oil compared to Primo-ban-20 and Phostoxin (Table 2, where all confidence intervals overlap).

Test sample24 h exposure48 h exposure

M. lucida
essential oil

Units (concentration causing 50% mortality) and (concentration causing 90% mortality) in units of g/mL. 95% confidence interval (CI) is shown in parenthesis. Insecticidal activity is considered significantly different when the 95% CI fail to overlap. Chi-square value of Probit model fit, all significant at level.

4. Discussion

Recently, biological activity has been demonstrated for the M. lucida essential oil, such as the complete suppression of aflatoxin synthesis in maize [29], cytotoxic activity on cancer cell lines [30], and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity [20]. This study demonstrated a potent insecticidal activity for M. lucida, showing 100% mortality on C. maculatus at concentrations of 0.20 and 0.40 μg/mL after 72 h (Figure 1).

Our results for M. lucida essential oil are consistent with other reports of essential oils that exhibited insecticidal and repellency activity against C. maculatus, such as Eucalyptus intertexta, Callistemon viminalis, Ocimum americanum, Hyptis suaveolens, Hyptis spicigera, Lippia multiflora, Cymbopogon citratus, and Lippia rugosa [25, 3135]. Chaubey [36] evaluated the insecticidal, oviposition, egg hatching and developmental inhibitory activities of seven different essential oils against Callosobruchus chinensis and found that Nigella sativa was the most effective at all stages. Moreover, Kéita et al. [16] found that essential oils of Ocimum basilicum and O. gratissimum at a dose of 25 μg/mL after 12 h of fumigation produced 80% and 70% mortality, respectively. Similarly, Moharramipour et al. [37] have shown a repellency of 82.4% of the Thymus persicus essential oil against C. maculatus.

The chemical components of this essential oil have been previously reported [38, 39], although there were differences in the ratio of their chemicals constituents. Okoh et al. [38] identified 50 compounds where α-terpinene was the major constituent with 17.8%, while in this study it represented only 0.8%. This difference could be attributed to the number of compounds identified in each study, since in this study, 63 components were identified, representing 95.4% of the total oil content. The essential oil was found to be dominated by oxygenated monoterpenes (Table 1).

Several essential oils components have shown insecticidal activity against C. maculatus. The leaf oil of Cymbopogon schoenanthus, rich in piperitone, gave 90% mortality after 24 h at a concentration of 6.7 μL/L [40]. Plectranthus grandifolius essential oil, predominantly (E)-myroxide, was shown to be toxic to both adults and eggs of C. maculatus. Likewise, Cinnamomum aromaticum bark oil, rich in cis-cinnamaldehyde, was insecticidal with an LC50 of 27.6 μg/cm2 after 24 h [41]. The essential oil from Cymbopogon giganteus, rich in limonene and p-mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol, demonstrated insecticidal activity against C. maculatus and C. subinnotatus [42]. The concentrations of the major terpenoids constituents presented here for M. lucida essential oil are consistent with use of this plant as an insecticide and insect repellent.

The insecticidal activity of the M. lucida essential oil could be attributed to those known major components of oxygenated monoterpenes: 1,8-cineole (43.4%), α-terpinyl acetate (14.5%), 4-terpinen-4-ol (3.4%), α-terpinol (3.4%), and monoterpene hydrocarbons: sabinene (8.2%) and β-pinene (4.0%). These are compounds whose insecticide and repellent activities have been reported previously [32, 43, 44]. Nevertheless, it also has been shown that minor components may contribute to the biological activity [45] such as Myrcene, α-phellandrene, and Camphene.

The intensive use of synthetic insecticides not only produces genetic resistance by insect species but also causes serious problems of toxicity to humans and other animal species [6, 7]. Therefore, the essential oil extracted from M. lucida represents a botanical insecticide source, since it showed a potent insecticidal activity comparable to both pesticides, Phostoxin, and Primo-ban-20 (Table 2, where confidence intervals overlap). The lack of a statistical difference between M. lucida essential oil and two commercial pesticides is a positive result and demonstrates their equivalence, though we cannot conclude that M. lucida is more effective.

The results obtained indicate that M. lucida essential oil was biocidal even at lower concentration and may, therefore, be considered to be a useful alternative to synthetic insecticides.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that essential oil extracted from M. lucida was toxic to pulse beetle C. maculatus. Therefore, it could be used as an alternative strategy for C. maculatus control and as a substitute for synthetic pesticides. However, further studies are necessary to elucidate the mode of action and their environmental impact and develop formulations to improve the insecticidal efficacy. This would benefit agricultural sectors of developing countries as these essential oils are readily available and biodegradable. The problem of volatility can be resolved through a controlled release formulation of their active chemical compositions.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Moses S. Owolabi and Eduardo Padilla-Camberos contributed equally to this work.


The authors thank Damilola Ajayi for the collection and identification of the plant sample. Mrs. Helen Owolabi is gratefully acknowledged for her useful comments.


  1. C. Park, S. I. Kim, and Y. J. Ahn, “Insecticidal activity of asarones identified in Acorus gramineus rhizome against three coleopteran stored-product insects,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 333–342, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Rahman and F. A. Talukder, “Bioefficacy of some plant derivatives that protect grain against the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus,” Journal of Insect Science, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  3. B. Mulatu and T. Gebrmedhin, “Oviposition-deterrent and toxic effects of various botanicals on the Adzuki bean beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L,” International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, vol. 20, pp. 33–38, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  4. F. A. Ajayi and N. E. S. Lale, “Seed coat texture, host species and time of application affect the efficacy of essential oils applied for the control of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in stored pulses,” International Journal of Pest Management, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 161–166, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. A. Tapondjou, C. Adler, H. Bouda, and D. A. Fontem, “Efficacy of powder and essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves as post-harvest grain protectants against six-stored product beetles,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 395–402, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. K. Mahmud, M. M. H. Khan, M. Husain, M. I. Alam, and M. S. I. Afrad, “Toxic effects of different plant oils on pulse beetle Callosobruchus chinensis Linn (Coleoptera: Bruchidae),” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh: Science, vol. 28, pp. 11–18, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. F. A. Lolestani and N. Shayesteh, “Fumigant toxicity of Ziziphora clinopodioides (Boiss.) (Lamiaceae) against adults and eggs of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae),” Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 92–95, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. A. Elhag, “Deterrent effects of some botanical products on oviposition of the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae),” International Journal of Pest Management, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 109–113, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. O. Adedire and J. O. Akinneye, “Biological activity of tree marigold, Tithonia diversifolia, on cowpea seed bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae),” Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 144, pp. 185–189, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  10. P. Koona and S. Dorn, “Extracts from Tephrosia vogelii for the protection of stored legume seeds against damage by three bruchid species,” Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. P. Papachristos, A. C. Kimbaris, N. T. Papadopoulos, and M. G. Polissiou, “Toxicity of citrus essential oils against Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae,” Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 381–389, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Martinez-Velazquez, G. A. Castillo-Herrera, R. Rosario-Cruz et al., “Acaricidal effect and chemical composition of essential oils extracted from Cuminum cyminum, Pimenta dioica and Ocimum basilicum against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae),” Parasitology Research, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 481–487, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. S. Kawuki, A. Agona, P. Nampala, and E. Adipala, “A comparison of effectiveness of plant-based and synthetic insecticides in the field management of pod and storage pests of cowpea,” Crop Protection, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 473–478, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. Mahfuz and M. Khalequzzaman, “Contact and fumigant toxicity of essential oils against Callosobruchus maculatus,” University Journal of Zoology, Rajshahi University, vol. 26, pp. 63–66, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  15. I. Chiffelle, A. Huerta, M. Celis, and J. E. Araya, “Proximal analysis and insecticidal effects of extracts from pepper tree (Schinus molle) leaves on elm leaf beetle (Xanthogaleruca luteola) larvae,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 523–528, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. M. Kéita, C. Vincent, J. Schmit, J. T. Arnason, and A. Bélanger, “Efficacy of essential oil of Ocimum basilicum L. and O. gratissimum L. applied as an insecticidal fumigant and powder to control Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) [Coleoptera: Bruchidae],” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 339–349, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. J. Pascual-Villalobos and M. C. Ballesta-Acosta, “Chemical variation in an Ocimum basilicum germplasm collection and activity of the essential oils on Callosobruchus maculatus,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 673–679, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. Pavela, “Insecticidal and repellent activity of selected essential oils against of the pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus (Fabricius) adults,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 888–892, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Martinez-Velazquez, R. Rosario-Cruz, G. Castillo-Herrera, J. M. Flores-Fernandez, A. H. Alvarez, and E. Lugo-Cervantes, “Acaricidal effect of Essential Oils from Lippia graveolens (Lamiales: Verbenaceae), Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiales: Lamiaceae), and Allium sativum (Liliales: Liliaceae) Against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae),” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 822–827, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. D. Karou, T. Tchacondo, D. P. Ilboudo, and J. Simpore, “Saharan Rubiaceae : a review of their traditional uses, phytochemistry and biological activities,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 149–169, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. M. Makinde and P. O. Obih, “Screening of Morinda lucida leaf extract for antimalarial action on Plasmodium berghei in mice,” African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 59–63, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  22. B. Oliver-Bever, Medicinal Plants in Tropical West Africa, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1986.
  23. K. M. Joppa, A. Vovor, K. Eklu-Gadegbeku, A. Agbonon, K. Aklikokou, and M. Gbeassor, “Effect of Morinda Lucida benth. (Rubiaceae) and Newbouldia leavis P. beauv. (Bignoniaceae) on sickling of red blood cells,” Medecine Tropicale, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 251–256, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  24. K. Kovendan, K. Murugan, S. P. Shanthakumar, S. Vincent, and J. Hwang, “Larvicidal activity of Morinda citrifolia L. (Noni) (Family: Rubiaceae) leaf extract against Anopheles stephensi, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Aedes aegypti,” Parasitology Research, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1481–1490, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Z. Ilboudo, L. C. B. Dabiré, R. C. H. Nébié et al., “Biological activity and persistence of four essential oils towards the main pest of stored cowpeas, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae),” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 124–128, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. W. D. Taylor, “Phosphine a major fumigant at risk,” International Pest Control, vol. 31, pp. 10–14, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  27. W. S. Abbott, “A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 18, pp. 265–267, 1925. View at: Google Scholar
  28. D. J. Finney, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1971. View at: MathSciNet
  29. S. A. Bankole, “Effect of essential oils from two Nigerian medicinal plants (Azadirachta indica and Morinda lucida) on growth and aflatoxin B1 production in maize grain by a toxigenic Aspergillus flavus,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 190–192, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. S. Ashidi, P. J. Houghton, P. J. Hylands, and T. Efferth, “Ethnobotanical survey and cytotoxicity testing of plants of South-western Nigeria used to treat cancer, with isolation of cytotoxic constituents from Cajanus cajan Millsp. leaves,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 501–512, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Lajide, C. O. Adedire, W. A. Muse, and S. O. Agele, “Insecticidal activity of Powders of some Nigerian plant against the maize weevils (Sitophilus zeamais Mots) in stored maize,” Entomology and the Nigerian Economy, vol. 31, pp. 227–235, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  32. T. S. L. Ngamo, I. Ngatanko, M. B. Ngassoum, P. M. Mapongmestsem, and T. Hance, “Persistence of insecticidal activities of crude essential oils of three aromatic plants towards four major stored product insect pests,” African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 2, pp. 173–177, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. Negahban and S. Moharramipour, “Fumigant toxicity of Eucalyptus intertexta, Eucalyptus sargentii and Eucalyptus camaldulensis against stored-product beetles,” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 256–261, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. F. Ndomo, L. A. Tapondjou, L. T. Ngamo, and T. Hance, “Insecticidal activities of essential oil of Callistemon viminalis applied as fumigant and powder against two bruchids,” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 333–341, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. S. Owolabi, M. O. Oladimeji, L. Lajide, G. Singh, P. Marimuthu, and V. A. Isidorov, “Bioactivity of three plant derived essential oils agianst the maize weevils Sitophilus zeamais(Motschulsky) and cowpea weevils Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius),” Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 828–835, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  36. M. K. Chaubey, “Fumigant toxicity of essential oils from some common spices against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae),” Journal of Oleo Science, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 171–179, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Moharramipour, A. Taghizadeh, M. H. Meshkatalsadat, A. A. Talebi, and Y. Fathipour, “Repellent and fumigant toxicity of essential oil from Thymus persicus against Tribolium castaneum and Callosobruchus maculatus,” Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 639–642, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. O. Okoh, O. T. Asekun, O. B. Familoni, and A. J. Afolayan, “Composition and antioxidant activities of leaf and root volatile oils of Morinda lucida,” Natural Product Communications, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1537–1541, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  39. K. Koumaglo, M. Gbeassor, O. Nikabu, C. de Souza, and W. Werner, “Effects of three compounds extracted from Morinda lucida on Plasmodium falciparum,” Planta Medica, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 533–534, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. K. Ketoh, H. K. Koumaglo, and I. A. Glitho, “Inhibition of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) development with essential oil extracted from Cymbopogon schoenanthus L. Spreng. (Poaceae), and the wasp Dinarmus basalis (Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae),” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 363–371, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. Islam, R. I. Khan, S. M. Al-Reza, Y. T. Jeong, C. H. Song, and M. Khalequzzaman, “Chemical composition and insecticidal properties of Cinnamomum aromaticum (Nees) essential oil against the stored product beetle Callosobruchusmaculatus (F.),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 1241–1246, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. S. Nyamador, G. K. Ketoh, K. Amévoin, Y. Nuto, H. K. Koumaglo, and I. A. Glitho, “Variation in the susceptibility of two Callosobruchus species to essential oils,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 48–51, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. Kouninki, T. Hance, F. A. Noudjou et al., “Toxicity of some terpenoids of essential oils of Xylopia aethiopica from Cameroon against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky,” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 269–274, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. Waliwitiya, M. B. Isman, R. S. Vernon, and A. Riseman, “Insecticidal activity of selected monoterpenoids and rosemary oil to Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae),” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1560–1565, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. N. S. Iacobellis, P. Lo Cantore, F. Capasso, and F. Senatore, “Antibacterial activity of Cuminum cyminum L. and Carum carvi L. essential oils,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Moses S. Owolabi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.