Research Article
Neighboring and Connectivity-Aware Routing in VANETs
Table 1
Comparison of routing protocols.
| Routing protocols | Type of routing | Delivery ratio | Latency (sec) | Environment applicable |
| GPSR | Non-DTN | Low | High* | Urban | GPSR-L | Non-DTN | Better | ND | Highway | VRP | Non-DTN | High | ND | Highway | GPSR J+ | Non-DTN | Low | High* | Urban | GRANT | Non-DTN | Low | ND | Urban | A-STAR | Non-DTN | High | High* | Urban | LOUVRE | Non-DTN | Better | High* | Urban | RBVT-R | Non-DTN | High | High* | Urban | RBVT-P | Non-DTN | Better | Low* | Urban | EBGR | Non-DTN | Low | Low* | Urban and Highway | B-MFR | Non-DTN | Low | High* | Urban | VADD | DTN | High | Low* | Urban | CMGR | DTN | High | High* | Urban | SADV | DTN | Low | High* | Urban and highway | D-Greedy | DTN | High | High* | Urban | D-MinCost | DTN | High | High* | Urban | GeoDTN + Nav | Hybrid | High | High* | Urban |
|
|
Low: below 50%; better: between 50% and 70%; high: above 70%. Low*: below 0.04; high*: above 0.04; ND: not determined.
|