Research Article  Open Access
EnergyEfficient Routing Control Algorithm in LargeScale WSN for Water Environment Monitoring with Application to Three Gorges Reservoir Area
Abstract
The typical application backgrounds of largescale WSN (wireless sensor networks) for the water environment monitoring in the Three Gorges Reservoir are large coverage area and wide distribution. To maximally prolong lifetime of largescale WSN, a new energysaving routing algorithm has been proposed, using the method of maximum energywelfare optimization clustering. Firstly, temporary clusters are formed based on two main parameters, the remaining energy of nodes and the distance between a node and the base station. Secondly, the algorithm adjusts cluster heads and optimizes the clustering according to the maximum energywelfare of the cluster by the cluster head shifting mechanism. Finally, in order to save node energy efficiently, cluster heads transmit data to the base station in singlehop and multihop way. Theoretical analysis and simulation results show that the proposed algorithm is feasible and advanced. It can efficiently save the node energy, balance the energy dissipation of all nodes, and prolong the network lifetime.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the WSN technology has attracted extensive attention of the academia, industry and, government. It became one of the most competitive technologies among a lot of fields, such as, national defense and military, environment monitoring and forecasting, healthcare, smart home, building structure monitoring, complex mechanical control, urban transportation, space exploration, management of large workshop and warehouse, and safe monitoring of airport and large industrial parks [1, 2]. However, these sensor nodes in WSN are usually powered by batteries; the energy of nodes is limited and it is difficult to replace or recharge the batteries because of the wild environment and the huge number of nodes. The limited energy of nodes seriously affects the lifetime of WSN, which has constrained the largescale application of WSN. Hence, it is important to improve the energy efficiency and prolong the network lifetime under the premise of limited energy, which is the key technical problems of WSN needing to be solved [3].
Designing an energyefficient routing algorithm is the best way to prolong network lifetime of WSN and improve the quality of information transmission [4, 5]. Currently, a variety of routing protocols have been proposed to save energy. Existing routing protocols are generally divided into two categories: flat routing and hierarchical routing [6]. Flat routing is easy to implement, no additional cost of topology maintenance and packet routing, but it is not proper to wireless sensor networks. Hierarchical routing, also known as clustering routing, such as lowpower Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy Protocol LEACH [7] and PEGASIS [8] protocols, has proposed the methods using cluster heads to form the clusters. Researches show that the hierarchical routing protocol is better than the planar routing protocol in the aspects of adaptability and energy efficiency. Thus hierarchical routing protocol received extensive attention [9, 10].
The application of wireless sensor networks for water environment monitoring in the Three Gorges Reservoir area is a typical case of largescale wireless sensor networks research. And it has the typical characteristics of zonal distribution and large coverage area. Our research is based on the achievements we already obtained and deeply study on the existing routing algorithms, such as, LEACH and PARPEW [11] algorithm, and the focus is on the energy saving routing algorithm for largescale WSN. So an improved energysaving routing algorithm based on maximum energywelfare optimization clustering has been proposed. In the simulation experiment, a rectangular area with greater aspect ratio is used to approach the actual banding distribution. Simulation results show that the performance of the proposed algorithm is superior to the other two algorithms’.
2. The Network Model of LargeScale Wireless Sensor Networks
The Three Gorges Project is the worldfamous water conservancy project, which brings the enormous economic and social benefits, while also triggering ecological environmental safety issues. Because that the selfpurification capacity of static water is much lower than flowing water, the Three Gorges Reservoir water environment was gradually deteriorating and the water environment security became the focus of attention at home and abroad [12]. Currently, the environmental monitoring stations have been established in the Three Gorges Reservoir area to undertake a very important water environment monitoring tasks. However, the existing monitoring equipment, monitoring methods and means cannot meet the requirements, so it is urgent to strengthen the reservoir water environment monitoring capacity and improve the level of monitoring. According to this situation, the solution of building the Three Gorges Reservoir water environment monitoring system with WSN has been proposed [13].
Due to the large area and wide distribution of the Three Gorges Reservoir, which involves 26 counties (of which 22 are in Chongqing Municipality’s jurisdiction) and some less accessible places, it shows a meandering tree structure [14]. Therefore, the distribution and networking method should be based on its unique serpentine tree structure. The distribution of the Three Gorges Reservoir and the structure model of the WSN water quality supervision system are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 shows that in such a largescale wireless sensor network, nodes are far away from each other, and energy consumption by sending messages among nodes is very large, especially in some remote and inaccessible areas. So it is unrealistic to replenish their nodes energy frequently. Therefore, it is particularly important to improve energy efficiency and balance energy consumption of nodes in the wireless sensor networks. For these characteristics of the network, a new energysaving routing algorithm has been proposed to solve this problem.
3. Related Researches
LEACH is the first to be proposed as a hierarchical routing algorithm, which combines the MAC protocol and the clusterbased energy efficient routing algorithm and performs well in extending the lifetime of the network. Dividing the network running into many rounds is its main idea, and in each round there are two steps: clusters establishment and stable transmission of data. During the establishment of clusters, each node generates a random value between 0 and 1. And if it is less than the threshold value , expressed as (1), it will be elected as the cluster head: where, is the percentage of the cluster heads occupied in the total nodes, is the current round number, and is the set of the nodes which have not been selected as cluster heads in the last rounds.
In the LEACH algorithm, the random rotation mechanism of cluster heads was used to balance the energy load to each node, so that the network lifetime has been prolonged. Compared with the normal planar multihop routing algorithm and static hierarchical algorithm, LEACH algorithm is outstanding, and the network lifetime can be prolonged by 15%. However, there are also some shortcomings, such as: the remaining energy of nodes was not considered into the cluster heads selection; uneven distribution of cluster heads and cluster sizes resulted from the random cluster heads selection mechanism, which causes the decline in the balance of network load; when the network size is large, singlehop data transmission will lead to those cluster heads death, which are far away from the base station, so that the lifetime of the whole network will be affected.
Therefore, a lot of improved algorithms based on LEACH have been proposed to improve the network performance recently. In the LEACHC algorithm [15], which was proposed by Heinzelman and so forth, the centralized control method was used and the base station obtained the cluster head by running a simulated annealing, so that the problem of uneven distribution of cluster heads in LEACH was solved. But it is not completely selfdirected and is not good in expansibility with the centralized control method. To improve the quality of clustering, the distribution density, remaining energy of nodes, and other factors were taken into consideration in [16, 17]. But collecting information about neighbor nodes in the whole network increased the communication overhead and latency. In [18], the time interval was used to cluster instead of random number and threshold. But the distribution of the cluster head nodes has been ignored. A clustering algorithm based on energy optimization has been proposed in [19], which protected low energy nodes and reduced overhead of clustering by the competition parameters of cluster head, so that the network lifetime was prolonged. In [20], firstly, clusters were formed according to the optimization of the number of clusters, and then the data routing among clusters were completed by searching the shortest path based on the Kruskual algorithm, so that the energy efficiency of nodes has been improved. But the balance of the energy consumption of network was not mentioned.
In the social economics, the welfare reflects the equilibrium relationship between fairness and efficiency of the social crowd income [21]. In [21], a new metric for WSN is proposed, which combines energy balancing and energy efficiency, that is, EW (energywelfare). The main idea of the PARPEW algorithm is to optimize clustering according to the predicted energy consumption of nodes and energywelfare of clustering. So, good results such as extending network lifetime and balancing energy consumption have been achieved. Besides, it is simple to compute the energy welfare only through the local routing information. However, the shortcoming is that in the cluster heads adjustment, only the energy welfare was taken into consideration, while the effect of the remaining energy of nodes was ignored. Therefore, the situation that those nodes with low remaining energy were elected as the cluster head also existed. In addition, communication using singlehop will decrease the energy efficiency and is not conducive to network expansion.
4. The Improved Algorithm
4.1. The Network Model
Assume that the wireless network has the following properties.(1)The position of the nodes will not be changed once deployed. The base station is located outside the area and full of energy.(2)All nodes are energy limited and of the same structure and initial energy.(3)All nodes have a unique ID.(4)The transmit power can be adjusted according to the distance.(5)All nodes can sense their remaining energy and compute the distance to the emission source according to the received signal strength.
4.2. The Energy Model
The energy model which is the same with it in [7] was used in this paper, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 shows the data packet transmission between two nodes, in which the distance is and the size of the packet is bit. So the transmitter energy consumption is expressed as:
The energy consumption of the receiving terminal is shown in as:
In (2) and (3), the energy consumption of transmitting and receiving 1 bit data is denoted as . , are the energy consumption coefficients of different channel propagation model. is the threshold value denoted as , which is used to distinguish the freespace path loss model from the multipath fading model.
The energy consumption for integration of data packets of bit is expressed as: where, is the energy consumption for integration of a data of 1 bit.
4.3. Algorithm Description
In the initial stages of networking, the TDMA time slot of the whole nodes was broadcasted by the base station at a time. Each node broadcasted its message to the whole nodes according to the TDMA time slot and then calculated the distance from the emission source according to the received signal strength, where the distance is denoted as , , and is the number of the nodes in the network. And to provide convenience for next clustering optimization and routing, the distance was stored in the memory of the node. This step only runs once at the initial stage of networking, and the following operation model was the same with the LEACH algorithm.
4.3.1. Temporary Clustering
To reduce the energy consumption of nodes, it is better to select the nodes with more remaining energy near the base station. So, in this paper, the two factors were all taken into consideration when selecting the cluster heads. The improved threshold is expressed as: where is the energy factor, denoted as ; , are the remaining energy and initial energy of the node , respectively. is the distance factor, expressed as , is the distance between node and base station, and is the maximum of the distance from nodes to base station.
After the election of the temporary cluster head, the normal nodes sent application (including their own ID and the remaining energy of node) to those cluster heads, which costed their least communication energy. Thus, the temporary clustering was completed.
4.3.2. Cluster Heads Adjustment Based on Energy Welfare Maximization and Clustering Optimization
(1) Energy Welfare. Assume that the th round of the cluster has nodes, and the remaining energy of the th node is denoted as . According to the network model, the remaining energy after transmission of the node can be predicted, which is expressed as , shown as follows:
Thus, the energy welfare of cluster can be obtained [21], as expressed in the following equations: where, is the balance index of the energy consumption of node, and the greater the value, the more balanced the energy consumption. is the parameter representing the degree of hating inequality, and the greater the value of , the more disagreeable of inequality. So, the energy consumption of nodes with low power attracts more attention, and the typical value for is 1.5 [22].
The energy efficiency and the property of energy balance were both considered into the energy welfare. Therefore, increasing energy welfare can save node energy and balance the energy consumption of the network. The energy welfare instance is shown in Figure 3.
(a)
(b)
As is shown in Figure 3(a), there are three nodes in the cluster, and the energy required by the data transmission among nodes is given, and is the remaining energy of the node . To simplify the calculation, the energy consumed by cluster head for receiving data was set to be 1. The comparison between remaining energy after transmission and energy welfare of clustering of the three kinds of network models is shown in Figure 3(b). As can be seen in the figure, when the node 1 was selected as cluster head (CH), the energy efficiency is maximal, and the mean of remaining energy is 30.33 J. Considering the energy consumption balance index, when the node 3 was selected as cluster head, the energy welfare of clustering reached the maximum, and the energy efficiency and the property of energy consumption are the best. Therefore, to elect node 3 as cluster head is the most reasonable.
(2) Cluster Head Adjustment and Process of Clustering Optimization. Before cluster head adjustment, the candidate nodes for cluster head should be limited firstly. Assuming that the set of the candidate nodes for cluster head of the cluster is , so where, is the remaining energy of node in the th round, and is the mean value of the energy remaining of the nodes as follows:
The processes of clustering optimization are shown as the following.(1)Calculate the energy array according to the network model and the distance array , and then determine the set of candidate nodes for cluster head of cluster .(2)If the set is empty, the temporary cluster head will be selected as the real cluster head (RCH) directly. Otherwise, the energy welfare of cluster is , according to equations (6)(7) using each node in the set when the node is selected as RCH.(3)Determine RCH according to the max energywelfare of cluster , that is , and the node is RCH.(4)After RCH is determined, the temporary cluster head broadcasts the TDMA time slot and control packets (including the ID of the temporary cluster head and RCH, and the remaining energy) of the cluster member nodes. Other nodes in the cluster become the normal nodes according to the control packets and send data to RCH according to the distributed TDMA time slot. At last the cluster head adjustment and clustering optimization are finished.
4.3.3. The Data Routing among Clusters
The transmission of data routing among nodes combines singlehop with multihop. If the distance from cluster head to base station is less than , the cluster head communicates with base station directly. Otherwise, a relay will be chosen from the neighbor cluster heads to transmit data until the data reach the base station.
Firstly, the set of neighbor cluster heads of cluster (, is the number of the cluster heads) is denoted as which should meet the following condition: where is the distance from cluster head to cluster head , and is the distance from cluster head to base station. is the forward cost factor, and . Choosing a proper can avoid the problem that those cluster heads of the same distance away from base station consume too much energy for transmitting data.
Then, using the greedy algorithm the cluster head selects a relay which has the maximal weight function from the set to transmit data. Considering the factors, such as, remaining energy of the node, the path costs, and the angle deviation between node and base station [23], the weight function is defined as follow: where is the remaining energy of the cluster head , is the angle deviation between node and base station, , , are the weighting coefficient, and . If the set is empty, the cluster head sends data to the base station directly. Otherwise, the cluster head sends data to the relay. When all of the cluster heads find the relays, the data routing among clusters is completed.
5. Simulation and Analysis
The performance evaluation of our proposed algorithm has been carried by using MATLAB simulation. We also compared the proposed algorithm with the LEACH algorithm and PARPEW algorithm. Taking into account the typical characteristics of zonal distribution of the Three Gorges Reservoir for water environment monitoring, in the simulation experiment, we used a rectangular area to approach the banding distribution, which has greater aspect ratio. Network simulation scenario is shown in Figure 4.
100 sensor nodes were deployed in a 200 m × 50 m rectangular area, and the base station was just above the area with the coordinates (100 m, 175 m). In the simulation, the forward price factor , the weighting coefficients , , . Other simulation parameters of the network are shown in Table 1.

First, we compared the network performance among three algorithms, including the number of surviving nodes, nodes’ energy consumption, and energy balance of network. Then, we analyzed the performance of our proposed algorithm in largescale wireless sensor networks.
5.1. The Simulation of Lifecycle and Energy Consumption
Network lifetime is one of the most important criteria for evaluating the quality of routing protocol. Figure 5 shows the corresponding changes of the survival nodes’ number during simulation. As can be seen from the figure, the network lifetime (defined as the number of rounds when the first node died) was obviously improved by the proposed algorithm in this paper with respect to LEACH and PARPEW algorithms. Since the proposed algorithm in this paper is based on the improved max energywelfare method to adjust cluster head and optimize the clustering, the distribution of the cluster heads is more uniform and reasonable, and the energy consumption is efficiently balanced. Besides, cluster heads transmit data to the base station in singlehop and multihop way. It improves the energy efficiency of cluster heads and balances the energy consumption of cluster heads in different place.
The comparison curve of the total energy consumption of the network and the simulation time among the three algorithms is shown in Figure 6. The smaller slope of the curve indicates that the network has a slower rate of energy consumption and longer lifetime. In Figure 6, the slope of the curve of the proposed algorithm in this paper is minimal, and the total energy consumption of the network in any time is lower than that of the LEACH and PARPEW algorithms. So the energy consumption of the network has been reduced successfully.
To eliminate the effect of the chance factor, a number of simulations have been done to obtain the statistical average. The statistical average of lifetime and the total energy consumption at 500th round using different algorithms are shown in Table 2.

As can be seen from Table 2, compared with other two algorithms, the proposed algorithms can efficiently extend the lifetime of the network and reduce network energy consumption. The detailed comparative results are shown in Table 3.

5.2. The Simulation of Energy Balance
In this paper, the remaining energy mean and variance of nodes at a certain time were used to measure and further analyze the energy balance of the proposed algorithm. At time , the greater the mean and the less the variance, the better the energy balance of the network. The comparison of the energy balance among the different algorithms is shown in Figures 7 and 8.
Figures 7 and 8 show that the average remaining energy of nodes in the network of the proposed algorithm in this paper has been greater than the mean energy of the other two algorithms, and the variance of the residual energy is much lower than the other two algorithms. There is no much change. Therefore, the proposed algorithm in this paper is effective in saving nodes’ energy and balancing the network energy consumption. Its performance of energy balance is optimal.
5.3. The Simulation of Adaptability in LargeScale WSN
Another important feature of the Three Gorges Reservoir water environment monitoring network is large coverage area and wide distribution. To further illustrate our proposed algorithm’s good performance in largescale wireless sensor network applications, we assumed threenetwork simulation environments as shown in Table 4. And we compared the network lifetime of three algorithms under the same conditions of the other parameters.

Figure 9 shows the comparison of the network lifetime of three algorithms under different environment conditions. As can be seen from the figure, in the three simulation environments, network lifetime of the proposed algorithm is superior to the other two algorithms’. And with the increasing of network size, the advantages of the proposed algorithm are more obvious in performance. This is mainly because that the algorithm uses the cluster heads optimization strategies and improved data transmission scheme to fully save and balance the energy consumption of nodes. Therefore, for the feature of largescale water environment monitoring network application in Three Gorges Reservoir, our proposed algorithm has obvious advantages.
6. Conclusions
An improved energy saving routing algorithm based on maximum energywelfare optimization clustering has been proposed. There are three aspects of the major improvements: firstly, remaining energy and the distance from base station of nodes were both considered when selecting cluster heads. So it is more reasonable. Secondly, the cluster heads adjustment and clustering optimization based on improved maximum energywelfare made the distribution of cluster heads more uniform, and the energy consumption of network has been balanced efficiently. Thirdly, the factors such as path costs, remaining energy, and angle deviation between node and base station were taken into consideration in the clustering routing construction, so that the energy efficiency of nodes has been increased. Simulation results show that compared with LEACH and PARPEW algorithms, the proposed algorithm in this paper can efficiently save energy of each node, balance the energy consumption, and prolong the lifetime of the network. It is suitable to the Three Gorges Reservoir water environment monitoring network with zonal structure. With the increasing size of network, this effect will be more obvious.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge The National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51374264) and The Scientific and Technological Project of Chongqing (no.CSTC2012ggyyjs40010).
References
 J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, and D. Ghosal, “Wireless sensor network survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2292–2330, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Zhu and L. Sun, “Development status of wireless sensor network,” ZTE Communications, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Hu, L. Shen, T. Song, and D. Ren, “Novel clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” Journal on Communications, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 20–29, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Goyal and M. R. Tripathy, “Routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: a survey,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies (ACCT '12), pp. 474–480, Rohtak, India, January 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Chen, Y. Zhong, and X. Zhang, “A pseudo genetic algorithm,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Chen and C. Chuang, “A novel energyefficient adaptive routing protocol for wireless sensor network,” Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, “Energyefficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3005–3014, IEEE, January 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Lindsey and C. Raghavendra, “PEGASIS: powerefficient gathering in sensor information systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1125–1129, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Yi, J. Heo, Y. Cho, and J. Hong, “PEACH: powerefficient and adaptive clustering hierarchy protocol for wireless sensor networks,” Computer Communications, vol. 30, no. 1415, pp. 2842–2852, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Manap, B. M. Ali, C. K. Ng, N. K. Noordin, and A. Sali, “A review on hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor networks,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 1077–1104, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P.T. Yang and S. Lee, “A distributed reclustering hierarchy routing protocol using social welfare in wireless sensor networks,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 2012, Article ID 681026, 14 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Lan, “Analysis for water quality variation in TGP reservoir area before and after impoundment,” Yangtze River, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 7–8, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Zhong, K. Guo, B. Xu, and J. Wang, “A hybrid network construction for water environmental monitoring of three Gorges reservoir,” World SciTech R&D, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 737–740, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Ji, “The general picture of the three Gorges region,” Chongqing Architecture, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 W. B. Heinzelman, A. P. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, “An applicationspecific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 660–670, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Li, L. Sun, R. Wang, and H. Huang, “Improvement of LEACH algorithm in wireless sensor network,” Journal of Computer Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 131–134, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Luan, C. Zhu, B. Su, and C. Pei, “An improved routing algorithm on LEACH by combining node degree and residual energy for WSNs,” in Internet of Things, vol. 312 of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 104–109, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Li, X. Shen, H. Chen, and E. Sun, “Research and improvement of LEACH routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1163–1167, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Liu and Y. Wu, “Energy optimized approach based on clustering routing arithmetic for wireless senor networks,” Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 764–770, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhong, B. Xu, K. Guo, and D. Zhou, “A partition multihop LEACH algorithm facing water environment monitoring of three Gorges reservoir area,” World SciTech R&D, vol. 2, no. 33, pp. 89–92, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Ok, S. Lee, P. Mitra, and S. Kumara, “Distributed routing in wireless sensor networks using energy welfare metric,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 9, pp. 1656–1670, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. A. Seiver, “A note on the measurement of income inequality with interval data,” Review of Income and Wealth, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 229–233, 1979. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. N. Quynh, H. T. Trung, and V. TranQuang, “Improving energy efficiency for ARPEES routing protocol in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference onAdvanced Technologies for Communications (ATC '12), pp. 73–77, Hanoi, Vietnam, October 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Yuanchang Zhong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.