The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 806168 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/806168

On a Subclass of Meromorphic Close-to-Convex Functions

Academic Editor: Rosihan M. Ali
Received05 Jul 2014
Accepted14 Aug 2014
Published28 Aug 2014

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to introduce and investigate a certain subclass of meromorphic close-to-convex functions. Such results as coefficient inequalities, convolution property, inclusion relationship, distortion property, and radius of meromorphic convexity are derived.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Let denote the class of functions of the form which are analytic in the punctured open unit disk

For two functions and , analytic in , we say that the function is subordinate to in and write if there exists a Schwarz function , which is analytic in with such that Indeed, it is known that Furthermore, if the function is univalent in , then we have the following equivalence:

Let , where is given by (1) and is defined by Then the Hadamard product (or convolution) of the functions and is defined by

A function is said to be in the class of meromorphic starlike functions if it satisfies the inequality A function is said to be in the class of meromorphic convex functions if it satisfies the inequality Moreover, a function is said to be in the class of meromorphic close-to-convex functions if it satisfies the condition

Let be analytic in . If there exists a function such that then we say that , where denotes the usual class of convex functions. The function class was introduced and studied recently by Peng [1] (see also Peng and Han [2], Selvaraj [3], Gao and Zhou [4], Kowalczyk and Leś-Bomba [5], and Xu et al. [6]).

Motivated essentially by the above mentioned function class , we now introduce and investigate the following class of meromorphic close-to-convex functions.

Definition 1. A function is said to be in the class if it satisfies the inequality where (and throughout this paper unless otherwise mentioned) the parameters and are constrained as follows:
It is easy to verify that if and only if We observe that and, thus, the function class is a subclass of meromorphic close-to-convex functions.
Clearly, the class is the familiar class of meromorphic close-to-convex functions of order .
For some recent investigations of meromorphic functions, see, for example, the works of [722] and the references cited therein.
To derive our main results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 2 (see [23]). Let be analytic in and let be analytic and convex in . If , then

Lemma 3 (see [24]). Suppose that Then Each of these inequalities is sharp, with the extremal function given by

Lemma 4 (see [25]). Let and . Then, if and only if

Lemma 5 (see [26]). Suppose that the function . Then

Lemma 6 (see [27]). Suppose that Then, where is the unique root of the equation in the interval . The results are sharp.

In the present paper, we aim at proving some coefficient inequalities, convolution property, inclusion relationship, distortion property, and radius of meromorphic convexity of the class .

2. Main Results

We begin by stating the following coefficient inequality of the class .

Theorem 7. Suppose that Then

Proof. Let and suppose that where It follows that In view of Lemma 2, we know that By substituting the series expressions of functions , , and into (34), we get Since is univalent in , it is well known that .
On the other hand, we find from (38) that By noting that , it follows from Lemma 3 that Combining (37), (39), and (40), we have Thus, the assertion (33) of Theorem 7 follows directly from (41).

Theorem 8. Let
If satisfies the condition then .

Proof. To prove , it suffices to show that (15) holds. From (43), we know that Now, by the maximum modulus principle, we deduce from (1) and (44) that This evidently completes the proof of Theorem 8.

Example 9. By applying Theorem 8, it is obvious to see that the function

Theorem 10. Let and . A function if and only if

Proof. A function if and only if It is easy to see that condition (48) can be written as We observe that By substituting (50) into (49), we get the desired assertion (47) of Theorem 10.

Theorem 11. Let Then,

Proof. Suppose that . We easily know that By setting , , , and , it follows from (51) that In view of Lemma 4, we deduce that which implies that . Thus, the assertion (52) of Theorem 11 holds.

Theorem 12. Let . Then,

Proof. Let . By definition, we know that Suppose that the function is defined by (36). Then, we have Since , by Lemma 5, we know that Thus, by virtue of (36), (58), and (59), we readily get the assertion (56) of Theorem 12.

Finally, we derive the radius of meromorphic convexity for the class .

Theorem 13. Let with . Then,(1)for , is meromorphic convex in ;(2)for , is meromorphic convex in ,where is the unique root of the equation in the interval and and are the smallest root of the equations in the interval , respectively.

Proof. Let and suppose that Then, It follows from (62) that Differentiating both sides of (64) logarithmically, we get Since , we know that Combining (63), (65), (66), and Lemma 6, we obtain where is the unique root of (30) in the interval . It follows from (67) that the bound of meromorphic convexity for the class is determined either by the equation or by the equation
We note that (68) and (69) can be rewritten as follows:
Let and be the smallest root of the equations and in the interval , respectively. By observing that , we deduce that for .
Similarly, we know that for , since .
We observe that Thus, when , is meromorphic convex in ; when , is meromorphic convex in .
The proof of Theorem 13 is thus completed.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation under Grant nos. 11301008 and 11226088, the Foundation for Excellent Youth Teachers of Colleges and Universities of Henan Province under Grant no. 2013GGJS-146, and the Natural Science Foundation of Educational Committee of Henan Province under Grant no. 14B110012 of the People's Republic of China. The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions which essentially improved the quality of this paper.

References

  1. Z.-G. Peng, “On a subclass of close to convex functions,” Acta Mathematica Scientia B, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1449–1456, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  2. Z.-G. Peng and Q.-Q. Han, “On the coefficients of several classes of bi-univalent functions,” Acta Mathematica Scientia B, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 228–240, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  3. C. Selvaraj, “A subclass of close-to-convex functions,” Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2004. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  4. C.-Y. Gao and S.-Q. Zhou, “On a class of analytic functions related to the starlike functions,” Kyungpook Mathematical Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 2005. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  5. J. Kowalczyk and E. Leś-Bomba, “On a subclass of close-to-convex functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1147–1151, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  6. N. Xu, D.-G. Yang, and S. Owa, “On strongly starlike multivalent functions of order β and type α,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 283, no. 8, pp. 1207–1218, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  7. R. M. Ali and V. Ravichandran, “Classes of meromorphic α-convex functions,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1479–1490, 2010. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  8. R. M. Ali, V. Ravichandran, and N. Seenivasagan, “Subordination and superordination of the Liu-Srivastava linear operator on meromorphic functions,” Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 193–207, 2008. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  9. R. M. Ali, V. Ravichandran, and N. Seenivasagan, “On subordination and superordination of the multiplier transformation for meromorphic functions,” Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 311–324, 2010. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  10. J. Dziok, “Classes of meromorphic functions associated with conic regions,” Acta Mathematica Scientia B, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 765–774, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. J. Dziok, G. Murugusundaramoorthy, and J. Sokół, “On certain class of meromorphic functions with positive coefficients,” Acta Mathematica Scientia B, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1376–1390, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  12. M. Nunokawa and O. P. Ahuja, “On meromorphic starlike and convex functions,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1027–1032, 2001. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  13. V. Ravichandran, S. Sivaprasad Kumar, and K. G. Subramanian, “Convolution conditions for spirallikeness and convex spirallikeness of certain meromorphic p-valent functions,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, article 11, pp. 1–7, 2004. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  14. L. Shi, J.-P. Yi, and Z.-G. Wang, “On certain subclass of meromorphic close-to-convex functions,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 20, pp. 10143–10149, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  15. H. M. Srivastava, D.-G. Yang, and N. Xu, “Some subclasses of meromorphically multivalent functions associated with a linear operator,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  16. Z.-G. Wang, Z.-H. Liu, and A. Cǎtaş, “On neighborhoods and partial sums of certain meromorphic multivalent functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 864–868, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  17. Z.-G. Wang, Z.-H. Liu, and R.-G. Xiang, “Some criteria for meromorphic multivalent starlike functions,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 1107–1111, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  18. Z. Wang, Y. Sun, and N. Xu, “Some properties of certain meromorphic close-to-convex functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 454–460, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  19. Z.-G. Wang, H. M. Srivastava, and S.-M. Yuan, “Some basic properties of certain subclasses of meromorphically starlike functions,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2014, article 29, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  20. Z.-G. Wang, Y. Sun, and Z.-H. Zhang, “Certain classes of meromorphic multivalent functions,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1408–1417, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  21. Y.-H. Xu, B. A. Frasin, and J.-L. Liu, “Certain sufficient conditions for starlikeness and convexity of meromorphically multivalent functions,” Acta Mathematica Scientia B, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1300–1304, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  22. S. Yuan, Z. Liu, and H. M. Srivastava, “Some inclusion relationships and integral-preserving properties of certain subclasses of meromorphic functions associated with a family of integral operators,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 505–515, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  23. A. W. Goodman, Univalent Functions, vol. 1, Polygonal Publishing House, Washington, NJ, USA, 1983.
  24. J. Clunie, “On meromorphic schlicht functions,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 34, pp. 215–216, 1959. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  25. H. Silverman and E. M. Silvia, “Subclasses of starlike functions subordinate to convex functions,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 27, pp. 48–61, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  26. C. Pommerenke, “On meromorphic starlike functions,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 13, pp. 221–235, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  27. W. Janowski, “Some extremal problems for certain families of analytic functions,” Annales Polonici Mathematici, vol. 28, pp. 297–326, 1973. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet

Copyright © 2014 Ming-Liang Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

500 Views | 360 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.